Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea: A Seismic Event Detected Yesterday Afternoon(2.3 in Richter Scale)
KBS ^ | 08/26/06 | Lee Ki-moon

Posted on 08/26/2006 1:09:01 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

/begin my translation

N. Korea: A Seismic Event Detected Yesterday Afternoon(2.3 in Richter Scale)


Yesterday at 4:50 pm, there was a seismic event in N. Korea, registering 2.3 in Richter Scale, which prompted authorities to figure out its nature.

According to Korean Meteorological Administration, its source was found to be to the north north west of Yeonchon, Kyunggi Province, and 49km away(approx. 30 miles.) It is at the border area between Hwang-hae Province and Kangwon Province.

After analyzing the seismic wave of the event,  Korean Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources reached the conclusion that it could be the result of  routine demolition activity by setting off TNT underground 


[weather news] Lee Ki-moon


/end my translation


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 23; construction; dprk; explosion; nkorea; northkorea; seismicevent; tnt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
According to an update( http://news.kbs.co.kr/article/local/200608/20060826/1210266.html ),

it occurred near Pan-kyo, Kangwon Province, N. Korea,
the magnitude of explosion is equivalent to that of setting off two metric tons of TNT,
such explosions have been frequently detected near Pan-kyo recently.


IMHO, N. Koreans must be constructing an underground installation(a missile base?) inside hard rock formation.

1 posted on 08/26/2006 1:09:02 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 08/26/2006 1:09:34 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

bttt


3 posted on 08/26/2006 1:11:14 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Or a tiny nuke?


4 posted on 08/26/2006 1:11:41 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

They must be firing up the old Stargate.


5 posted on 08/26/2006 1:12:23 AM PDT by ClaudiusI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster


boom.
6 posted on 08/26/2006 1:14:26 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Missile base, superdeep shelter, something like that.


7 posted on 08/26/2006 1:16:04 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone
No - nukes have a distinctive signature on a seismograph:

Nukes also have a distinct and easily identifiable P and S Wave pattern. It's how we know that China and the USSR popped at least one nuke off in their border wars back in the 70s.

8 posted on 08/26/2006 1:19:10 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Awwww, my tinfoil hat slipped off.


9 posted on 08/26/2006 1:20:04 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

But, you compared a nuke to an earthquake, not a nuke to TNT.


10 posted on 08/26/2006 1:20:42 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

A small earthquake - big deal.


11 posted on 08/26/2006 1:21:46 AM PDT by Pro-Bush ("A nation without borders is not a nation." President Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Nukes also have a distinct and easily identifiable P and S Wave pattern. It's how we know that China and the USSR popped at least one nuke off in their border wars back in the 70s.



I'd never heard that. Could you go into more detail?


12 posted on 08/26/2006 1:22:40 AM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone

You said "or a tiny nuke". Just dispelling that.

Manmade conventional explosions are, as the article says, easy to distinguish from natural earthquakes. The big clue is that the energy instantly spikes, rather than ramping or building up to a peak.


13 posted on 08/26/2006 1:23:11 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Are you saying that China or the USSR set off a hostile, above ground nuclear weapon in the '70s? Do you have a source?


14 posted on 08/26/2006 1:23:36 AM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

The event wasn't said to be an "earthquake" so exactly what did you wish to dispel?


15 posted on 08/26/2006 1:27:46 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush

This is only a test of the FR North Korea nuclear test detection system. If this had been an actual test, please refer to instructions inside your tinfoil hat.


16 posted on 08/26/2006 1:34:43 AM PDT by eartotheground (king-jones-farkas RINO axis of evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kms61

Certainly - The Chinese and the Soviets had sporadic border skirmishes from 1969 until May 1991, when they signed a treaty formalizing the borders and withdrawing troops from the area. This isn't something that's really well known because, well, neither party was real interested in publicizing it when they were attempting to present a united front on Vietnam. The worst of the fighting was 69 to about 75. (Google for Sino-Soviet Border Clashes or Wars.)

Anyway, at the height of the border wars, there were a number of inexplicable seismic events localized to that area that had the unmistakable signature of a nuclear weapon. One of them could have only been a nuclear detonation, the others could have either been nukes or enormous conventional explosive charges. Judging by the size, per experts, the devices were of the tactical nuke class. (There's a couple of books on the subject; titles completely escape me at the moment.) The background radiation count also went up, but other than that, there was no proof that anyone had done anything - no point in announcing it.

The general consensus seems to be that about 5 atomic or nuclear weapons have been used in anger, including ours on Japan.


17 posted on 08/26/2006 1:35:01 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

pflr


18 posted on 08/26/2006 1:35:08 AM PDT by crghill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

NK would not use a nuke in anger, but in glee.


19 posted on 08/26/2006 1:35:44 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Ditto Iran


20 posted on 08/26/2006 1:36:05 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson