Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japanese-American veterans groups attack Watada
Associated Press ^ | Aug. 23, 2006 | Associated Press

Posted on 08/25/2006 2:43:32 PM PDT by george76

Nine veterans groups in California are criticizing 1st Lt. Ehren Watada for his decision to disobey deployment orders to Iraq.

Watada is trying to "make himself a martyr and a hero," said Robert M. Wada, a charter president of the Japanese American Korean War Veterans.

He said Watada's actions disrespect a legacy of military service by Japanese-American soldiers dating back to World War II.

"No Japanese-Americans did anything like that and that is why Japanese-Americans are so upset," Wada said.

"He is doing something that has never been done by Japanese-Americans."

The groups expressed their outrage at Watada in a public statement Monday.

Watada, 28, a graduate of Hawaii Pacific University and Kalani High School, refused to deploy to Iraq on June 22 with his unit based at Fort Lewis, Wash. He is now awaiting the finding of a hearing held last week that could lead to his court-martial on charges of conduct unbecoming of an officer, missing troop movement and contempt toward officials.

"No one refused to go just because they didn't believe in the war," Wada said. "We went to Korea, and we didn't know what the hell we were there for. ... But nobody refused to go."

But Bob Watada, the lieutenant's father, said his son is grateful for the veterans who fought in previous wars and he isn't dishonoring their legacy.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; US: California; US: Hawaii; US: Washington; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: american; americannisei; army; article88; bobwatada; corruption; desertion; ehrenwatada; honolulu; iraq; iraqwar; japan; japaneseamericans; japanping; johnkerrywannabe; nisei; robertmwada; sepku; seppuku; stryker; veterans; wada; waronterror; watada; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: USNBandit

Was a requirement for me too, but that was back "when Nixon was President"...


41 posted on 08/25/2006 6:14:32 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Do you think they can go for 92 and 87 for basically the same act? I don't know. The three charges the Army is going forward with are pretty cut and dry. Contempt, Missing Movement, and Conduct Unbecoming. The first two will be easy. He didn't go, and his recorded statements to the press are pretty Cindy Sheehanesque.

The Army needs to be clear on one thing. They need to make an example of this putz.

42 posted on 08/25/2006 6:31:36 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: george76

Should probably be borne in mind that the American Nisei manned the most-decorated unit of World War II. And they had a lot more cause to dissent back then.


43 posted on 08/25/2006 6:42:12 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

The fellers at Leavenworth will LOVE seeing him. Too bad we can't do the Old Traditional Drumming Out Ceremony.


44 posted on 08/25/2006 6:49:42 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: george76
Watada. What a pussy.

Wada. What a MAN.

Therein lies the difference.

45 posted on 08/25/2006 6:50:38 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (..is an American allright, but is not in Japan, folks. Thanks for letting me keep the moniker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
There is also another action that should have already been taken: revocation of his security clearance, which is required of all commissioned officers. His lack of loyalty is reason enough for the Army's Central Clearance Facility to revoke his clearance and never reinstate it.

Every other article you mention are reasons as well. I've had clearances pulled, because soldiers became members of groups that are subversive in nature. This guy would have been gone a long time ago in my unit.

His rank should be RIPPED from his uniform in front of his unit.

46 posted on 08/25/2006 8:49:38 PM PDT by DilJective (Proudly serving in the US Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: george76
The author apparently doesn't know that the main groups for Americans of Japanese ancestry are against the hyphen, and go for Japanese American.

They should go for simply American, but Japanese American is more American than Japanese-American.

47 posted on 08/25/2006 10:32:36 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( http://www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

THIS GUY IS THE BIGGEST IDIOT EVER.

If you want to pull this off, you can not be an asian.

None of the asians will support this.
The leftists politicians see asians as too small a minority to be interested in supporting this.
Ditto for the news media.

The absence of any one supporting him means the military is going to want to make a big time example out of him.

He is so screwed.


48 posted on 08/25/2006 10:34:36 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat
Culturally they should be close to the same (with some variations), but they aren't.

The weather would be way off from the other two states (not close to the ocean, days and nights with greatly varying temperatures, etc.).

49 posted on 08/25/2006 10:35:51 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( http://www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

I'm impressed. Are you JAG or something like that, or do you just know your UCMJ?


50 posted on 08/25/2006 10:39:12 PM PDT by letsgonova19087
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

Weren't they the most decorated unit in American history?


51 posted on 08/25/2006 10:39:49 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( http://www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Why not throw in 85 as well?

(Not that I know my UCMJ, I googled it :) )


52 posted on 08/25/2006 10:42:48 PM PDT by letsgonova19087
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: letsgonova19087
I'm not a JAG, but I had a semester's worth of legal training at Annapolis. I also ran a fighter squadron line division in the fleet....so I have some legal experience.

I think the reason that the Army went with Missing Movement rather than desertion is the first stipulation in Art. 85. It says the person must leave his post, etc., with the purpose of remaining away permanently. Watada never went missing, he just refused to get on the bus to the airfield to deploy.

Usually desertion is a charge saved for those who have gone UA, Art. 86 for a specified period of time. Desertion would include guys that run to Canada to avoid deployment to a combat zone.

I know we all want to see this guy fried for everything, but we also need to look at it from a big Army perspective. They want to get this over with quick with the three charges that will be quick to convict. Enough prison time to set an example, but get it out of the press quickly.

53 posted on 08/25/2006 11:20:28 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: george76
That gutless sissyboy Lt. Watada can frak right off.

My oldest son is at Ft. Benning GA right now, busting his ass in basic training - he aspires to be an Army Ranger and fight wherever he is assigned.

I miss G every day he's not here, and fear for his safety. But at least I know my son has the FORTITUDE to put himself between us and the enemy!

Not like Lt. Watada here, who signed his name and took the oath, but doesn't have the strength of character to follow through with his duty.

Sorry - hearing about this puke made me mad as hell.

54 posted on 08/25/2006 11:21:24 PM PDT by FierceDraka (When every special interest gets their way, there will be no more Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

According to various sources, the 442nd Regimental Combat Team (Nisei) became the most decorated unit in U.S. military history for its size and length of service, earning it the title "The Purple Heart Battalion." Not sure how that compares to the Marine Corps - for example on Peleliu and Iwo Jima - but it's certainly nothing to sneeze at.


55 posted on 08/26/2006 1:53:40 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
Granted, this is from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/442nd_Regimental_Combat_Team , but it has the Nisei Regiment as the most decorated for how long it lasted and for the amount of people it had. So, the Marines could be the most decorated over all.
56 posted on 08/26/2006 2:23:39 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( http://www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: george76

bttt


57 posted on 08/26/2006 2:27:56 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Cindy Sheehan has probably already called.


58 posted on 08/26/2006 2:53:41 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

Yes, you're right. I just don't know. In any case, to be in the company of the United States Marines in terms of honors is an enormous achievement.


59 posted on 08/26/2006 3:38:28 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: hershey

Cindy and friends are ready to go.

Hopefully they will get Hillary and Lamont to join the protest.


60 posted on 08/26/2006 7:27:37 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson