To: presidio9
Bishop or Ayatollah?
2 posted on
08/24/2006 6:43:42 AM PDT by
yoe
To: Coleus; wideawake; NYer; Salvation
5 posted on
08/24/2006 6:45:16 AM PDT by
presidio9
(“The term ‘civilians’ does not exist in Islamic religious law.”)
To: yoe
I don't know what your comment is supposed to mean, but, as I understand it, this agency has the word "Catholic" in its name and the Bishop is acting quite appropriately in pointing out the inconsistency of having someone who teaches things contrary to the Catholic faith. If this agency wants to drop "Catholic" from its identity, fine, but I bet they wouldn't be willing to do that because it's a major help in fund-raising.
To: yoe
Your anti-Catholic bigotry is showing.
10 posted on
08/24/2006 6:58:18 AM PDT by
Apercu
("Res ipsa loquitur")
To: yoe
Bishop.
Did he do something wrong?
19 posted on
08/24/2006 7:26:07 AM PDT by
Protagoras
("Minimum-wage laws are one of the most powerful tools in the arsenal of racists." - Walter Williams)
To: yoe
Big difference #1 (there are many): If this were an Ayatollah, all those attending would be beheaded.
To: yoe
26 posted on
08/24/2006 7:49:50 AM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(Pay attention.)
To: yoe
Hmmm.... Are you suggesting that ayatollahs now support honest religious labeling, truth-in-advertising, and voluntary boycotts, to achieve their goals?
If that's the case, I'd say you've run into a better grade of ayatollah than most of us are familiar with.
28 posted on
08/24/2006 7:57:46 AM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(Kinder, gentler ayatollah. What a concept!)
To: yoe
This site has really come full circle.
Years ago, we (rightly) denounced Bill Clinton in unison.
Now, we have people defending Bill Clinton against the Catholic Church.
Just wonderful.
30 posted on
08/24/2006 8:02:33 AM PDT by
B Knotts
(Newt '08!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson