Skip to comments.
Conservatives try to curtail hotel porn
AP via Yahoo! News ^
| August 22, 2006
| DAVID CRARY
Posted on 08/22/2006 12:04:00 PM PDT by King of Florida
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 381 next last
To: rabidralph
301
posted on
08/22/2006 6:32:15 PM PDT
by
JTN
("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
To: TheKidster
302
posted on
08/22/2006 6:34:50 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
To: rabidralph
What is with all you hummers? It's really annoying. Say what you mean.
Your point, by the way, is ridiculous.
303
posted on
08/22/2006 6:38:36 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: A Balrog of Morgoth
Do these "hmmmmmers" annoy you or is it just me?
304
posted on
08/22/2006 6:39:20 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: PistolPaknMama
305
posted on
08/22/2006 6:40:19 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: TheKidster
Wait a minute, if someone watches porn to the point of arousal and "Pleasures Themself" to the point of orgasm, isn't he committing "preemptory Abortion"? All those potential fetuses (Feti, maybe) ending up in a kleenex.
To: ArGee
everything done in secret will be made public.So everyone will be using the sidewalk as a toilet? Ewwww.
307
posted on
08/22/2006 6:47:53 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: King of Florida
308
posted on
08/22/2006 6:51:05 PM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Amnesty_From_Government.htm)
To: squarebarb
A lot of threads attract many posters. And many posters will use similar arguments.
So what does that prove?
309
posted on
08/22/2006 6:53:59 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: stands2reason
310
posted on
08/22/2006 6:53:59 PM PDT
by
PistolPaknMama
(Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't! --FReeper airborne)
To: squarebarb
So, you have no problem misusing Federal powers for something you personally find distasteful?
All Freepers should be against that.
311
posted on
08/22/2006 6:55:31 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: AlexandriaDuke
"Yeah, I got the feeling they do stuff like this to keep the donors happy."
BINGO! Don Pardo, tell our contestant what she has won!
You are absolutely right, here. These organizations are dedicated to raising money from the perpetually offended.
LOOK! Horrible Porn in Hotel Rooms! We MUST Fight This Scourge!
Only with your generous donations will be be able to eliminate porn from our nations hotel rooms. Click here to help us win the battle against hotel porn!
Of course, the only thing they are doing is issuing press releases and posting donation requests on their web sites. Pretty good deal for them, I'd say.
Maybe I'll start a religious web site and fleece some folks. I would sure be easier that working for a living.
312
posted on
08/22/2006 6:58:52 PM PDT
by
MineralMan
(Non-evangelical Atheist)
To: BritExPatInFla
Nope, half of the chromosomes that make up the human genome will never develop cognitive function, all you get are knuckle children, but you knew that :>) Good try though.
To: freedumb2003
To: GulfBreeze
Thank God the founding Fathers reserved to the people the rights to set their own community standards. Do you support the "community standards" of New York & Chicago regarding the ownership of handguns?
315
posted on
08/22/2006 7:10:32 PM PDT
by
tpaine
To: TheKidster
Yes -- I like your perspective.
316
posted on
08/22/2006 7:23:19 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
To: GulfBreeze
Never mind the damage it does to communities or families. Much better the Nannies get in and decide for people.
Thank God the founding Fathers reserved to the people the rights to set their own community standards.
It appears to one of the few things that keeps us from having an American Taliban to set the "standard" for everyone.
317
posted on
08/22/2006 7:30:21 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
To: tpaine
Do you support the "community standards" of New York & Chicago regarding the ownership of handguns? Equating the specifically enumerated second amendment protection of the right to bear arms, with the esoteric right to porn that must be inferred among the penumbras is about as ridiculous as the earlier comment equating porn and abortion.
In other words, while the power to set community standards is rightly recognized under the 10th Amendment as reserved to the People and to the States, the power to set community standards regarding ownership of firearms is not as it is clearly prohibited by the 2nd Amendment.
To: MineralMan
I've heard, though, that some porn films use the less-effective coitus interruptus technique.Some? More like most. Which, considering how porn is targetted towards hetero males, is very strange, I may add.
319
posted on
08/22/2006 7:38:35 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: madprof98
I thought conservatives didn't believe in the misuse of Federal powers.
So, now it's just the libertarians, huh?
320
posted on
08/22/2006 7:42:17 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 381 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson