Posted on 08/21/2006 5:51:49 PM PDT by Bob J
Why is this even in the mainstream news? A church is a private institution. They should be left alone as long as they abide by the law of the land. I can't see how any law has been violated by this particular church prohibiting this woman from teaching in a volunteer situation. Many religions including protestant christian groups, interpret all scripture literally. Other groups believe that scripture is a living breathing document open to interpretation based on the present culture. (Sound familiar?)
I Cor 14: 33B - 34 (NIV). As in all the congregations of the saints, women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says.
As someone else in this thread pointed out, submission does not mean being dominated. It means a voluntary acceptance of authority, such as submission to governmental authorities.
I didn't say that Adam sinned because he "lusted after Eve". He sinned because, at that moment in time, he chose Eve over God, knowing what God had commanded about the tree.
Ja, and she's not leading the assembly during worship services either, nor is she instructing men by preaching during Family Bible Hour (the sermon). The issue concerning the place that women service within an assembly only pertains to that of official church services, i.e., those official functions of the local expression of the church which the congregations has been called together as an group to observe.
I'd be interested if considering their opinion on that, what their doctrine concerning the headcovering is.
An example of what I am saying is when the disciples told Jesus that a person came doing miracles in his name and they forbid him to do so because he was not one of them. Jesus told them to let him alone to do his good works. If this person is teaching in Jesus' name and doing good works then who can condemn what God does not condemn.
Chicken! ;-)
I agree with you. It's interesting how this tiny, country church has gotten all this much attention for something that it's leaders have decided, that also happens many places, and is fairly unimportant. Oh, well. Sensationalist media. Nice title, "Crazy fundamentalist Chrsitian abuses 80 something year old woman".
What do you thibk Phoebe would say Deacon?
"I'd be interested if considering their opinion on that, what their doctrine concerning the headcovering is."
My guess would be he doesn't take that scripture literally. But who knows?
Hey, if St Paul was OK with it, who am I to say no?
LOL
Hey, I went to Our Lady too. Some of those nuns should be fired. Especially the ones who spent their evenings trying to think of new and creative ways to punish wayward children.
If you don't hear the Scriptures taught in the churches you go to, it's time to find another church, not fall in with those who change Scripture to adhere to their own human reasoning and political correctness.
Now that I think about it, I have never heard any human "argument" that improves on or negates anything in the Scriptures.
I'll stick with God and His Scriptures and live my life according to the Scriptures. Better to have the herd laugh than God laugh.
Sure, why not?
A few great women of the church come to mind: St. Catherine of Siena (proclaimed Doctor of the Church) St. Teresa of Avila to name two. They both taught men the teachings of Christ.
You got it! That's why this "rule" is so ludicrous.
placeholder
Of course they should. I guess I will need to read all the replies to see any reason why not.
Good luck with that dude. A good way to stay single or get a wood toupee.
True.
Hey, about those muslims.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.