Skip to comments.
Planet Debate Heats Up (ALL HELL BROKE LOOSE)
Sky Tonight ^
| August 18, 2006
| Richard Tresch Fienberg
Posted on 08/21/2006 9:44:15 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets
All hell broke loose today as astronomers began openly debating the definition of "planet" at the general assembly of the International Astronomical Union (IAU) in Prague, Czech Republic. About 100 planetary scientists and just as many interested onlookers from other disciplines met to discuss the definition that was proposed earlier this week (see our August 16th story and Robert Naeye's blog) and that is scheduled for an up-or-down vote among all 2,500 attendees at the assembly next Thursday, August 24th.
(Excerpt) Read more at skytonight.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: charon; pluto; xena; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Those planetary scientists sure are passionate.
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Well, at least they know what the word "evolution" means. ;)
Words are just symbols, and even in science, where verbal precision is almost as important as in law, some of the most commonly used words have different meaning for different people. Usually the differences are subtle, but they can be subtle as when an airplane on a 4,000 mile journey starts the trip only one degree off course. The results can be dramatically off the mark in the end.
2
posted on
08/21/2006 9:47:55 AM PDT
by
RobRoy
(Islam is more dangerous to the world now that Naziism was in 1937.)
To: RobRoy
3
posted on
08/21/2006 9:52:32 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
IMHO, the Kuiper Belt objects should not be considered planets, even if they are round.
OTOH, I would keep Pluto on the list due to historical precedence, stare decisis if you will, at least until lay people digest the facts and would feel comfortable dropping Pluto from the list.
To: SunkenCiv
5
posted on
08/21/2006 9:55:14 AM PDT
by
Pyro7480
("Love is the fusion of two souls in one in order to bring about mutual perfection." -S. Terese Andes)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
I'm glad that Clyde Tombaugh isn't around to see this happening, though there were hints of this before his death.
6
posted on
08/21/2006 9:55:53 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Worried about attacks from Iran or Korea? Daschle wanted to scuttle our missile defense program)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets; Pyro7480; annie laurie; garbageseeker; Knitting A Conundrum
7
posted on
08/21/2006 9:57:23 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Pyro7480
Sitchin's book "Twelfth Planet" needs retitled. "Fifteenth Planet" or "Fiftieth Planet".
8
posted on
08/21/2006 9:58:25 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
All hell broke loose today as astronomers began openly debating ...things were OK until someone started a slap fight. Then, another guy got stabbed with a compass, and it was on.
9
posted on
08/21/2006 10:00:45 AM PDT
by
wbill
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
I think the self importance of the scientists causes them to over complicate things.
They can't decide if Pluto is a planet so they add Pluto's moon Charon into the mix and call it a potential planet. However that doesn't make the rest of the moons in the solar system planets, only Charon which orbits an object that they can't decide on. To further convolute the issue they add an asteroid (Ceres) into the mix.
Maybe we should add the two Martian moons to the mix. They sure don't look like moons to me, they look like captured asteroids.
10
posted on
08/21/2006 10:00:45 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Name the Pluto-like planets..
Mickey, Minnie, Donald, Goofy, etc..
11
posted on
08/21/2006 10:01:37 AM PDT
by
Vinnie
To: RobRoy
in science, where verbal precision is almost as important as in law Only if you are talking to a mechanical engineer about work and power. The intent is to reduce the planet count gap between Solar planets and extrasolar planets to maintain our position in the galactic pecking order.
12
posted on
08/21/2006 10:01:53 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
I guess since none of these guys has a chance at going on a date any time soon, they have to expend their energy somewhere.
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
This debate is the scientific version of "how many angels can dance on the head of a pin." It's an excellent example of how technogeeks of whatever stripe can get wrapped around the axle about minutiae that have no real scientific value. It's all about defending one's own view on the matter.
14
posted on
08/21/2006 10:05:10 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: syriacus
This would be sad. I was once a member of the Astro Society of Las Cruses. Got to sit next to Clyde Tombaugh on one occasion. He was very hunched backed and frail but still had a sharp mind. He wore a Disney Watch with of course Pluto on it!
15
posted on
08/21/2006 10:07:13 AM PDT
by
Empireoftheatom48
(God bless our troops!! Our President and those who fight against the awful commie, liberal left!!)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Do you mean these?
To: r9etb
This debate is the scientific version of "how many angels can dance on the head of a pin." It's a question of whether the definiton of a planet comes about through a mysterious act of Creation, or whether it's all a matter of Intelligent Designation. Or maybe it's just random chance.
17
posted on
08/21/2006 10:09:30 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
( “I'm the Emperor, and I want dumplings!” (German: Ich bin der Kaiser und will Knödel.))
To: wbill
A 4-inch refracting telescope is the weapon of choice between astronomers. It makes a good club.
18
posted on
08/21/2006 10:09:42 AM PDT
by
AZLiberty
(Creating the <a href="http://clinton.senate.gov">straddle</a> Google bomb one post at a time.)
To: cripplecreek
It provides a useful break from weighty (bariac?) topics like whether or not the weirdo in Thailand killed the little girl in Boulder ten years ago or news of the latest missing White woman.
19
posted on
08/21/2006 10:10:12 AM PDT
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Does anyone know if any of the asteroids or ort bodies are large enough to be spherical due to their own gravity? This to me seems like a good criteria to separate planets from 'oids. The fact that Pluto orbits the Sun (and not another planet) seems like good criteria to separate it from being a moon (despite it's sixe). 28 posted on 02/16/2005 7:51:58 AM PST by arkham
My opinion on this issue is still the same as it was a year and a half ago. Nice to know the real astronomers are coming around. I agree with others that Charon should be considered a moon, though.
20
posted on
08/21/2006 10:11:35 AM PDT
by
arkham
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson