Posted on 08/20/2006 5:11:18 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
p>The Talk Shows
Sunday, August 20th, 2006
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., and Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y.; airport security consultant Rafi Ron; Rand Beers, former presidential counterterrorism adviser; Washington Nationals co-owner Mark Lerner.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass.; British Home Secretary John Reid; Spike Lee, director of the documentary "When the Levees Broke."
LATE EDITION (CNN) : Sens. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.; Iraqi Industry Minister Fawzi al-Hariri.
Specific instructions are much appreciated. Slow learner here. On the Coasties, they are so good that they almost never lose anyone. They are incredible and get almost no recognition...which actual heroes don't care about anyway.
Freep mail me with what you want to know and I'll help you if I can. What makes Firefox so powerful is all the addons (extensions) that make everything even easier.
BTW, find a fast moving thread and try my method of "refreshing". Click the post number (left corner below the thread text), or better yet the one immediately above it, and the thread will refresh and you will not have to scroll back to where you were.
Someone stated a few weeks ago that McCain & Clinton both share the fact that their one distinguishing core value is burning personal ambition.
BUMP 415
bump
Hey thanks! I thought Beers was appropriately "Kerried" in his
comments. Just glad Wallace announced his affiliation.
I've been wracking my brain about "fixing" the refresh "problem" with FireFox. You provide a practical and immeidate solution.
Duh!
My mantra to all of my PC users (I have 36,000 PCs I "own") is that there's always a way to lie to a computer to get it to do what you want. IOW, think outside of the box.
I forgot my own advice.
thank you for the lesson. I are grasshopper.
- FTN as MP3 audio file
- Transcript: Sen. Chuck Hagel on 'FOX News Sunday'
- Podcast links available here
NBC Meet The Press
Click here to see Sunday's MTP netcast. (After 1pm ET each Sunday)
Sorry to hear about your eyes I have just posted rodguy's single post award but did you have you wanted posted?
I saw your post on Sunday and appreciated it, but snugs "special post" award for MNJ in the resultant tumult pointed me back to it. His post is right on and I agree with both his post and your post almost 100%, but I have to say something here. Invoking Sancho Panza messes with my entire world view.
Don Quixote is one of the foundations of my personal view of reality. He's a madman. I accept that. But his madness is noble. It is "to the good." And he stands up against impossible odds for what is RIGHT.
To dream the impossible dream
To fight the unbeatable foe
To bear with unbearable sorrow
To run where the brave dare not goTo right the unrightable wrong
To love pure and chaste from afar
To try when your arms are too weary
To reach the unreachable starThis is my quest
To follow that star
No matter how hopeless
No matter how farTo fight for the right
Without question or pause
To be willing to march into Hell
For a heavenly causeAnd I know if I'll only be true
To this glorious quest
That my heart will lie peaceful and calm
When I'm laid to my restAnd the world will be better for this
That one man, scorned and covered with scars
Still strove with his last ounce of courage
To reach the unreachable star
And Sancho Panza recognized that Don Quixote was right, even when he was "wrong," and therefore stood by him, even in his madness. It's easy to declare "I am right" and justify almost any horror. But Don Quixote specifically argues for WHAT IS RIGHT, and action taken in defense of that. Moral absolutes. Right and wrong. Something the moral relativists reject. Sancho may even be wrong, but, like his "master," he is pursuing a correct goal, in my view. I cannot condemn someone on that basis. I can argue that their reasoning is faulty and try to convince them of the error of their position, but I can't condemn their attempt to do "what is right" on that basis alone. If I do I deny all of my own arguments of "right" and "wrong" I will not cede that ground.
I remain the eternal (cynical) optimist. And I am also the hopeless romantic.
That does not contradict your post in any way, in my view. I'm just making a different argument. (Oh, am I doomed for this, or what?)
Have I missed any single post awards if so please freep me.
Thanks for all you do snugs.
no, I only did the one. Because I do the "honorable mentions" I don't think of single post awards as often. I probably should do that more, though. I'm actually more likely to think of doing that when it's not my week and have suggested ones in the past to the person doing the review that week.
thanks for your hard work.
Thanks I just wanted to check that I had no missed anyone and thank you for your hard work.
Now rest the eyes :0)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.