Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Jihad Jack' convictions quashed
news.com.au ^ | 18th August 2006

Posted on 08/17/2006 11:48:01 PM PDT by naturalman1975

AN appeal court has quashed the convictions of the first man jailed under Australia's new anti-terror laws.

Joseph Terrence Thomas, dubbed Jihad Jack, was arrested in Pakistan in January 2003 and convicted in Australia in February this year of receiving funds from al-Qaeda and holding a false passport.

He was sentenced to five years' jail with a minimum term of two years.

But today, Victorian Court of Appeal Justices Chris Maxwell, Frank Vincent and Peter Buchanan quashed the convictions, saying the evidence used to find Thomas guilty was inadmissable.

More to come...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: australia; jihadjack; pakistan

1 posted on 08/17/2006 11:48:02 PM PDT by naturalman1975
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
This is a setback. it will happen no doubt in the UK and probably soon.

Assumption:

Peacetime Democratic processes and judiciary are too brittle to contain terrorism.
2 posted on 08/18/2006 12:08:38 AM PDT by vimto (Blighty Awaken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975; vimto

The Bad Guys will succeed because they can use our silly rules against us. They do not recognize rules, and are therefore not constrained by them. We are, and thereby we handcuff ourselves against them.

For as long as "we" (the Civilized world) allow this situation to prevail, we will continue to see the gradual and inevitable erosion of Society.

When that is thru, those who are left will enjoy life in Muslim servitude.


3 posted on 08/18/2006 12:13:41 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (I am the Chieftain of my Clan. I bow to nobody. Get out of my way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Bloody courts will have much to answer for after our first terrorist attack!


4 posted on 08/18/2006 1:10:28 AM PDT by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter; vimto; naturalman1975

The courts must come up with another way of punishing cops/governments for civil rights violations than throwing out the evidence.

Letting the criminal go free, deters the civil rights violations but punishes all of society in the process.

One option is that courts should make officers/decision makers due community service in their free time for rights violations, but keep the criminals locked up.


5 posted on 08/18/2006 3:02:47 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

> Letting the criminal go free, deters the civil rights violations but punishes all of society in the process.

I am in favor (not kidding) of a return of the Pillory. It's a very public sentence, carried out in front of everybody, that takes a day or so and costs next-to-nothing to administer.

For those more awkward situations, I am in favor of the cat-o-nine-tails, publicly administered.

Both punishments severe, unpleasant, appropriate, and quickly over-and-done-with. Better still, they are inexpensive on the public purse.


6 posted on 08/18/2006 7:01:36 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (I am the Chieftain of my Clan. I bow to nobody. Get out of my way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson