BIG COURT STRIKES AGAIN!!!
Posted on 08/17/2006 7:44:30 PM PDT by nwrep
Carter appointee U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor has used the same kind of language that has become popular on left-wing blogs like Daily-Kos to slam the Bush family in the verdict she delivered today, declaring the NSA surveillance of terrorists unconstitutional.
In an irrelevant aside, she grabbed at the "King George" phrase thrown around in the left-wing blogosphere to launch a thinly-veiled attack on the President:
Our constitution was drafted by founders and ratified by a people who still held in vivid memory the image of King George III and his General Warrants.
In an allusion to the President's father, she went on, sounding like a DU member on hemp:
There are no hereditary Kings in America and no powers not created by the Constitution.
Further, she actually excuses and defends communication with terrorists:
For example, scholars and journalists such as plaintiffs Tara McKelvey, Larry Diamond, and Barnett Rubin indicate that they must conduct extensive research in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia, and must communicate with individuals abroad whom the United States government believes to be terrorist suspects or to be associated with terrorist organizations.12 In addition, attorneys Nancy Hollander, William Swor, Joshua Dratel, Mohammed Abdrabboh, and Nabih Ayad indicate that they must also communicate with individuals abroad whom the United States government believes to be terrorist suspects or to be associated with terrorist organizations,13 and must discuss confidential information over the phone and email with their international clients.
This judge is not fit to be so called. She has become a crack-whore for the terrorists.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
PING
She will be reversed so fast your head will spin...
Yoo Hoo .. more on our terrorists hugging judge
"In an allusion to the President's father, she went on, sounding like a DU member on hemp"
Ummm...you can't get high on hemp. Not very, anyway.
'Berserk' trapped squirrel trashes family home(UK)
Daily Mail ^ | 16 Aug 2006 | Staff
Posted on 08/17/2006 9:44:39 PM CDT by Marius3188
she should be thrown out on fat butt
It doesn't matter, major cases like this are never decided on the District court level. Its going to the USSC eventually which I believe will decide for the President. No District court judge can tell a President what to do, particularly in national security issues.
The 6th Circuit won't even have to rule on the merits; just throw it out because the plaintiffs don't have standing.
She might as well be a terrorist herself.
I hope you're right.
She is definitely todays liberal, stupid feckless crapweasel award winner. the winner gets an all expenses paid trip to Lebanon or Teheran to visit old pals. She is such a kiss ass pawn. Thanks Jimma'
That's a GREAT catch.
I've been working all day and have been relying on Ingraham and Levin for analysis. But I had not yet had an opportunity to read the decision from her "honor."
Ummm...you can't get high on hemp. Not very, anyway.
Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?
Well it ain't over now!
BIG COURT STRIKES AGAIN!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.