To: onyx
She is a terrorist. In her ruling she said that it's ok for scholars and journalist to communicate with the enemies. This now opens the doors for anyone one with internal knowledge of secrets to leave their classified jobs then claim to be a scholar or journalist and relay secret info to the terrorist unimpeded.
17 posted on
08/17/2006 7:57:01 PM PDT by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: tobyhill
22 posted on
08/17/2006 7:59:09 PM PDT by
onyx
(1 Billion Muslims -- "if" only 10% are radical, that's 100 Million who want to kill us.)
To: tobyhill
"In her ruling she said that it's ok for scholars and journalist to communicate with the enemies. "
Her statement say's they indicated they MUST communicat with blah blah. Now why would that be?
42 posted on
08/17/2006 8:16:19 PM PDT by
chewydog
To: tobyhill
She thought she was composing a respected opinion when she wrote:
"{plaintiffs}...must communicate with individuals abroad whom the United States government believes to be terrorist suspects or to be associated with terrorist organizations.
What she was really doing is writing the script for a (R) election ad.
84 posted on
08/17/2006 11:07:22 PM PDT by
TeleStraightShooter
(The Right To Take Life is NOT a Constitutional "Liberty" protected by the 14th Amendment)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson