Skip to comments.
Carter Judge slams Bush family in Kos-like language in NSA verdict
Anti-NSA Verdict - Full Statement ^
| August 17, 2006
| nwrep
Posted on 08/17/2006 7:44:30 PM PDT by nwrep
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-108 next last
To: hipaatwo
61
posted on
08/17/2006 8:35:04 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
To: nwrep
There are no Judge-Queens either. Time to vote on judges. She needs to go. Who does this judge think she IS?, making HER demands of the Presidency of this country? Disgusting.
62
posted on
08/17/2006 8:35:13 PM PDT
by
bboop
(Stealth Tutor)
To: nwrep
Our constitution was drafted by founders and ratified by a people who still held in vivid memory the image of King George III and his General Warrants. An analysis of the background of the warrant requirement for surveillance is an insult to George Bush? Not buying it. This is exactly the type of language one finds in Scalia opinions, for instance.
63
posted on
08/17/2006 8:35:26 PM PDT
by
jude24
("I will oppose the sword if it's not wielded well, because my enemies are men like me.")
To: Labyrinthos
Give me a fu*kin break moron! If you didn't have sh*t for brains you would realize it's called venting but I wouldn't put it past these liberal crack head judges that they're collaborating with the terrorist.
64
posted on
08/17/2006 8:35:45 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: Labyrinthos
Charge her with treason? Do you know how stupid you sound? You are probably one of the few people in America who knows less about our laws and the Constitution than this poor excuse for a jurist. Questioning Bush around here is seen as treason around here. It's frightening, really.
65
posted on
08/17/2006 8:36:58 PM PDT
by
jude24
("I will oppose the sword if it's not wielded well, because my enemies are men like me.")
To: jude24
Questioning Bush around here is seen as treason around here. It's frightening, really. Questioning the president's ability to protect the country against terrorists by monitoring their phone calls is what is frightening.
Bush can order terrorists killed, but he can't listen in on their phone calls.
That's a non-sequitur if there ever was one.
66
posted on
08/17/2006 8:39:48 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Today, we settled all family business.)
To: nopardons
Impeach this judge!Absolutely.
67
posted on
08/17/2006 8:41:07 PM PDT
by
T. Buzzard Trueblood
("No one cried when Clinton spied." -Crosslake)
To: jude24
You and your "progressive" pals pop up on these boards and pretend you know everything about the Constitution but always seem to ignore the Presidential Obligations within the Constitution to keep America safe. Why is that? I'll answer for you; you're a know-it-all, Jack of all trades master of none.
68
posted on
08/17/2006 8:48:08 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: nwrep
GRASSROOTS IMPEACHMENT?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor
69
posted on
08/17/2006 8:59:22 PM PDT
by
HighlyOpinionated
(In Memory of Crockett Nicolas, hit and run in the prime of his Cocker Spaniel life, 9/3/05.)
To: sinkspur
I've been a tough critic of Bush on immigration and other issues, but here I absolutely agree. The President needs the ability to monitor communications involving al Qaeda.
70
posted on
08/17/2006 9:00:20 PM PDT
by
NinoFan
To: kcvl
Doing whatever she can to bash Bush, no matter what consequences her actions may have.
71
posted on
08/17/2006 9:00:21 PM PDT
by
jdm
(I gotta give the Helen Thomas obsession a rest.)
To: szweig
She will be reversed so fast your head will spin...
In legalese, that unfortunately equates to about two years from now...
72
posted on
08/17/2006 9:04:29 PM PDT
by
ErnBatavia
(Meep Meep)
To: jdm
Hillary Rodham Clinton
73
posted on
08/17/2006 9:09:23 PM PDT
by
kcvl
To: nwrep
So this judge has determined that saving 3,000 or more american citizens is just not worth the price of eaves dropping on the terrorists planning. Next Liberals will begin to embrace sharia law as centrist behavior.
74
posted on
08/17/2006 9:10:54 PM PDT
by
tomnbeverly
(Thank God for Domestic Surveillance or thank the President either way just be thankful.)
To: nwrep
...Our constitution was drafted by founders and ratified by a people who still held in vivid memory the image of King George III and his General Warrants...The judge (lower case "J" intentional) would not like how the Founders and Ratifiers of the U.S. Constitution would have dealt with her and her kind. It boggles my mind the extent that these nitwits attempt to rewrite history to suit their purpose.
75
posted on
08/17/2006 9:11:57 PM PDT
by
Ghengis
(Alexander was a wuss!)
To: Always Right
forget it... hes ona roll
76
posted on
08/17/2006 9:13:56 PM PDT
by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
To: nwrep
Who said the Constitution is not a suicide pact? This is just part of the quote.
To: nwrep
I don't think her personal views influenced this decision in the least, do you? (casual whistling...)
78
posted on
08/17/2006 9:52:30 PM PDT
by
Lexinom
To: nwrep
"For example, scholars and journalists such as plaintiffs Tara McKelvey, Larry Diamond, and Barnett Rubin indicate that they must conduct extensive research in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia, and must communicate with individuals abroad whom the United States government believes to be terrorist suspects or to be associated with terrorist organizations.12 In addition, attorneys Nancy Hollander, William Swor, Joshua Dratel, Mohammed Abdrabboh, and Nabih Ayad indicate that they must also communicate with individuals abroad whom the United States government believes to be terrorist suspects or to be associated with terrorist organizations,13 and must discuss confidential information over the phone and email with their international clients."
Sure they must do that. Absolutely. Go right ahead. Be my guest.
And we, the US Govt must *absolutely* guarantee that 9/11 doesnt happen again and must absolutely listen in while you talk to terrorists.
Capiche???
79
posted on
08/17/2006 10:02:41 PM PDT
by
WOSG
To: Jameison
"When did Cindy Sheeham become a judge?"
When Jimmy Carter, er, Michael Moore, er, Ron Dellums, appointed her.
80
posted on
08/17/2006 10:04:37 PM PDT
by
WOSG
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson