Skip to comments.
Hizbullah refuses to disarm in south Lebanon
Jerusalem Post ^
| Aug. 13, 2006
Posted on 08/13/2006 3:36:11 PM PDT by Mount Athos
The Lebanese government was scheduled to meet on Sunday to discuss the disarming of Hizbullah south of the Litani River, but postponed that meeting following indications by the guerrilla group that they would not do so.
Hizbullah's refusal was conveyed to Lebanese Prime Minister Fuad Saniora through the group's representative in the Lebanese parliament, Nabih Berri.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2006israelwar; disarm; hezblahblah; hezbollah; lebanon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: Mount Athos
I'm having a hard time picturing what everybody is worrying about here. This "ceasefire" is going to last about five minutes.
21
posted on
08/13/2006 3:57:34 PM PDT
by
tomzz
To: Mount Athos
Thank you ever so much Mr. Nasralla!
With enemies like these, who needs friends?
22
posted on
08/13/2006 3:58:41 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The fourth estate is the fifth column.)
To: Mount Athos
"Hezbollah refuses to disarm in south Lebanon." I am shocked. Absolutely shocked.
To: LikeLight
24
posted on
08/13/2006 4:04:27 PM PDT
by
Uriah_lost
(http://www.wingercomics.com/d/20051205.html)
To: Always A Marine
Time for the IDF to CRY HAVOK!
25
posted on
08/13/2006 4:05:36 PM PDT
by
Uriah_lost
(http://www.wingercomics.com/d/20051205.html)
To: LikeLight
Israel called Lebbie/Hezzie's bluff.That thought has occurred to us as well. Some folks were piling on Israel for saying they would agree to the resolution, and that they had basically given a win to Hezbollah, yata yata yata.... Personally, I'm inclined to give Israel more credit than that. I also do not think that President Bush would have been onboard with this resolution if not for very good reasons.
26
posted on
08/13/2006 4:11:18 PM PDT
by
Chena
(I'm not young enough to know everything.)
To: Mount Athos
I suggest we elect Condi Rice as POTUS. She will straighten this whole mess out tout suite! (Do I really need a /sarc ?)
FMCDH(BITS)
27
posted on
08/13/2006 4:18:59 PM PDT
by
nothingnew
(I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
To: Mount Athos
"but postponed that meeting following indications by the guerrilla group that they would not do so."
28
posted on
08/13/2006 4:21:05 PM PDT
by
Cinnamon
To: NormsRevenge
Hizbullah refuses to disarm in south Lebanon And this was a shock to whom???
29
posted on
08/13/2006 4:24:10 PM PDT
by
ExSES
(the "bottom-line")
To: Mount Athos
Sorry! New orders came from Iran!
To: Mr_Moonlight
Maybe that's why we agreed to it and the French wasted no time in hedging the committment to send troops.
Hezbollah now appears completely isolated in Lebanon: every Sunni, Christian and Druze faction hates their guts and wants them defanged, and any prolongation of hostilities will be blamed squarely on them.
All we have to do now is arm and equip these factions to be the hammer while the Israeli positions south and east of the Litani are the anvil.
To: Mount Athos
B52 time baby.....Take 'em out grid by grid.....B52 style.
32
posted on
08/13/2006 4:36:13 PM PDT
by
blasater1960
( Ishmaelites...Still a wild-ass of a people....)
To: Uriah_lost
Sp = Havoc
(For those who do not understand Uriah Lost's reference, it was used by the Romans to let their soldiers know that while fighting they should take no prisoners.)
To: All
UPDATE: Captainsquartersblog says that BBC is reporting that Lebanon is
refusing to disarm Hezz.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4789083.stm
Crucial Lebanese cabinet talks on disarming Hezbollah fighters in southern Lebanon under a UN-brokered ceasefire have been put off.
A truce between Israel and Hezbollah is due to come into force at 0500 GMT.
The postponement, amid reported divisions, seriously complicates the establishment of a stable ceasefire, the BBC's Nick Childs in Beirut says. ...
[T]he issue of Hezbollah's disarmament and its military presence in southern Lebanon continues to cause major tensions within the fragile government, our correspondent reports.
He says that without a meeting and an agreed plan, it seems that the deployment of 15,000 Lebanese army troops to the south is unlikely to go ahead.
34
posted on
08/13/2006 4:37:06 PM PDT
by
MaestroLC
("Let him who wants peace prepare for war."--Vegetius, A.D. Forth Century)
To: Mount Athos
The ceasefire is DOA. Nevertheless Israel's leaders intend to implement it, just to show they're good little Quakerite Christians who turn the other cheek. Fools!
(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)
35
posted on
08/13/2006 4:38:34 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: winner3000
36
posted on
08/13/2006 4:39:12 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: edpc
ain't gonna happen.
About 40% of israeis are sheehan types.
And Olmert is a settle out of court f-ing lawyer.
37
posted on
08/13/2006 4:40:34 PM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
(an enemy of islam)
To: Mount Athos
Why is Israel accepting this "peace deal" and Hezbollah refuses to disarm? Olmert needs to be replaced with a more competent leader.
38
posted on
08/13/2006 4:41:50 PM PDT
by
garbageseeker
(Wars may be fought by weapons, but they are won by men. -General George Patton)
To: garbageseeker
Yesterday terrorist leader Nasrallah said we will accept UN resolution 1701. Hours ago they changed their mind and said no to UN resolution 1701, this clearly tells you that UN resolution 1701 is a defeat for Hizballah and that why they refused it. Now that the terrorists refused to leave to the North Litani river, then Israel will force them to do so.
39
posted on
08/13/2006 4:47:27 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: jveritas
I agree with you. This gives Israel the green light to continue. I wish that IDF would use a Douhet model on the Hezbollah on bring them to total submission.
40
posted on
08/13/2006 4:51:26 PM PDT
by
garbageseeker
(Wars may be fought by weapons, but they are won by men. -General George Patton)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson