To: West Coast Conservative
Many industry experts questioned whether moviegoers are ready for films about the disaster which is still fresh and painful in the minds of many Americans.What an absolute bogus, anti-war, horsecrap argument.
2 posted on
08/11/2006 10:02:11 AM PDT by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: West Coast Conservative
Well they could not have timed the release better with a crystal ball.
3 posted on
08/11/2006 10:02:14 AM PDT by
vimto
(Blighty Awaken!)
To: West Coast Conservative
Not a single word in the article about Oliver Stone and the controversy he brings to any film.
5 posted on
08/11/2006 10:05:00 AM PDT by
Tai_Chung
To: West Coast Conservative
My 9 and 10 year old daughters want to see this.
I am taking them. They are not too young to see what they will have the rest of their lifetime to fight.
6 posted on
08/11/2006 10:06:16 AM PDT by
sandbar
To: West Coast Conservative
I keep hearing the film is surprisingly accurate about Sept 11. But then others say there is no mention of Islam executing the terror.
So how good can this film be?
7 posted on
08/11/2006 10:06:51 AM PDT by
Vision
(“I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me" Philippians 3:14)
To: West Coast Conservative
My wife and I saw the film on Thursday--It was very moving and for Stone very fair and non-political1. Maybe a tad long but I would highly recommend it . It might re-awake some Libs into reality!
8 posted on
08/11/2006 10:08:07 AM PDT by
BobFromNJ
(Go Bush)
To: West Coast Conservative
World Trade Center disaster film opens strongreuters-tout-alert.
To: West Coast Conservative
Where are the sensitive people who were complaining about Flight 93 being too soon?
Now it's OK for Stone to make money off of 9/11? Ok.
12 posted on
08/11/2006 10:14:47 AM PDT by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: West Coast Conservative
The Democrat Party "hates" this type of film. It brings out patriotism in the general public and that means more Republican votes!
13 posted on
08/11/2006 10:14:59 AM PDT by
Blake#1
To: West Coast Conservative; All
16 posted on
08/11/2006 10:23:58 AM PDT by
soccer_maniac
(My new blog: http://capitalistpundit.blogspot.com/)
To: West Coast Conservative
Paramount was advertising this film on National Review Online today.
17 posted on
08/11/2006 10:33:42 AM PDT by
My2Cents
(A pirate's life for me.)
To: West Coast Conservative
What Timing.
20 posted on
08/11/2006 10:42:08 AM PDT by
BIGZ
To: West Coast Conservative
24 posted on
08/11/2006 10:54:01 AM PDT by
mysterio
To: West Coast Conservative
Screw them where it hurts. DON'T SPEND a PENNY on it. These are the "girly" men? of Hollywood pretending to be men! :) - Don't give them the money!
26 posted on
08/11/2006 10:56:41 AM PDT by
ElPatriota
(Let's not forget, we are all still friends despite our differences)
To: nutmeg
30 posted on
08/11/2006 11:27:25 AM PDT by
nutmeg
(National security trumps everything else.)
To: West Coast Conservative
I intend to see this tomorrow. The last time I went to the theater was to see "The Passion of the Christ." What the Liberal "media" means by "too soon" is that the movie has been released before the DemocRATS have regained their power and control of our wallets and pocketbooks.
32 posted on
08/11/2006 11:36:27 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Before you respond to that poll, imagine flying coach and Abdul just became your new pilot.)
To: West Coast Conservative
TOO SOON..............
Not over "Alexander" yet
33 posted on
08/11/2006 11:49:38 AM PDT by
Rumple4
To: West Coast Conservative
From what I understand this movie is not about the hijackings - it is about the cops - in fact I have read that the esteemed Mr. Stone gives little to no mention of the Islamic Terrorists who killed 3000 people - I can wait for video thanks - and maybe not even then.
34 posted on
08/11/2006 11:51:44 AM PDT by
BlueNgold
(Feed the Tree .....)
To: West Coast Conservative
I saw it tonight, and it's a touching disaster movie, that's about it. I'd give it a "B-". It could have been about two people trapped in earthquake rubble. No mention of who did it but "terrorists", whoever they are. If it was supposed to be about two people trapped in the rubble of a terrorist attack without getting into who did it, then why did it have to be about 9/11 at all? I'd recommend a matinee, I guess.
39 posted on
08/11/2006 11:01:35 PM PDT by
Squeako
(ACLU: "Only Christians, Boy Scouts and War Memorials are too vile to defend.")
To: West Coast Conservative
Went to see the movie last night. Very well done. Kudos to Stone for getting it right.
42 posted on
08/14/2006 2:26:23 AM PDT by
LayoutGuru2
(Know the difference between honoring diversity and honoring perversity? No? You must be a liberal!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson