Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radioactive Decay Not Always Constant?
Physics Web ^ | 31 July 2006 | Edwin Cartlidge

Posted on 08/08/2006 9:40:52 AM PDT by Sopater

A group of physicists in Germany claims to have discovered a way of speeding up radioactive decay that could render nuclear waste harmless on timescales of just a few tens of years. Their proposed technique – which involves slashing the half-life of an alpha emitter by embedding it in a metal and cooling the metal to a few degrees kelvin – could therefore avoid the need to bury nuclear waste in deep repositories, a hugely expensive and politically difficult process. But other researchers are sceptical and believe that the technique contradicts well-established theory as well as experiment.

The leader of the German-based group, Claus Rolfs of Ruhr University in Bochum, is an astrophysicist and made the discovery about alpha decay after replicating the fusion reactions that take place in the centre of stars. Using the university’s particle accelerator he fired protons and deuterons (nuclei containing a proton and a neutron) at various light nuclei. He noticed that the rate of fusion reactions was significantly greater when the nuclei were encased in metals than when they were inserted into insulators. He also observed that the effect is enhanced at lower temperatures (J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 32 489).

Rolfs believed this effect could be explained in simple terms by assuming that the free electrons in a metal act like the electrons in a plasma, as described in a model by Dutch physicist Peter Debye. The lower the temperature of the metal, the closer the free electrons get to the radioactive nuclei. These electrons accelerate positively charged particles towards the nuclei, thereby increasing the probability of fusion reactions.

But Rolfs realized that the reverse reaction might also occur and that free electrons could enhance the ejection of positively charged particles from a nucleus. This would reduce the half-lives of á-decay or â+-decay, and increase half-lives for processes involving electrons (which are repelled by the free electrons within the metal), i.e. â–-decay and electron capture.

The group has investigated this hypothesis by embedding a number of radioactive nuclei inside metals and then cooling the metal to a few degrees kelvin. As expected, they observed a longer half-life for the electron capture of beryllium-7 and shorter half-lives for â+-decay in sodium-22 (Eur. Phys. J. A 28 251) and á-decay in polonium-210. They are now investigating the á-decay of radium-226, a hazardous component of spent nuclear fuel with a half-life of 1600 years. Rolfs calculates that this half-life could be reduced to as little as a year and at the very least to 100 years, and believes that the half-lives of all other hazardous alpha emitters within nuclear waste could be shortened by similar amounts.

"This means that nuclear waste could probably be dealt with entirely within the lifetimes of the people that produce it," he says. "We would not have to put it underground and let our great-great-grandchildren pay the price for our high standard of living."

Rolfs admits that much engineering research needs to be done to convert his idea into practice, but he believes there are probably no insurmountable technical barriers. Other physicists, however, think that the basic idea may be flawed. According to Nick Stone, a nuclear physicist recently retired from Oxford University, physicists have already carried out experiments in which they cooled alpha emitters to 4 K and below, but found no significant changes in their half-lives.

Meanwhile, Hubert Flocard, director of the CSNSM nuclear-physics lab near Paris, believes that Rolfs' model contradicts standard solid-state physics, although he admits that he cannot explain the group's data himself. Rolfs concedes that he needs a more sophisticated theory, but stands by his results. "Nature decides what is right," he says.


TOPICS: Unclassified
KEYWORDS: ageofearth; energy; environment; nuclear; nuclearpower; radiometricdating; rustneversleeps
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
This would reduce the half-lives of á-decay or â+-decay, and increase half-lives for processes involving electrons (which are repelled by the free electrons within the metal), i.e. â–-decay and electron capture.

Any experts out there care to comment?
1 posted on 08/08/2006 9:40:53 AM PDT by Sopater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Weirder things have been true, so further investigation is reasonale.

But Madonna is a huge propoent, so I have serious doubts.


2 posted on 08/08/2006 9:43:31 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
It's pretty simple. You cool an alpha emitter and measure the decay rate. If the physicists in Germany are correct, this should be easily reproducible. If they expect to greatly reduce the decay rate the effect should be dramatic - reducing the decay rate by 0.0003% isn't going to help much.

Of course the usual cast of ...scientifically challenged... posters are going to overwhelm this thread of cries of "See, they've proven that decay rates change. It's a young world afterall!" La te da.

3 posted on 08/08/2006 9:46:47 AM PDT by blowfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

If true, this could be a huge boon to the nuclear power industry and another knife in the heart of OPEC and it's fanatical beneficiaries/parasites. That day can't come soon enough for me.


4 posted on 08/08/2006 9:49:23 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
According to Nick Stone, a nuclear physicist recently retired from Oxford University, physicists have already carried out experiments in which they cooled alpha emitters to 4 K and below, but found no significant changes in their half-lives.

Obviously, you've gotta deal with reality. If there is no change, then there is no change. But if there is a change, then there is a change. The mere fact that someone has done a prior experiment that showed one thing does not necessarily mean that the matter is not worth revisiting, though.

5 posted on 08/08/2006 9:50:10 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blowfish

Plus, other than ingestion danger, alpha emitters aren't much of a worry as waste. What about neutrons, gammas, and betas?


6 posted on 08/08/2006 9:52:07 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Crazier than a rattlesnake at a Thai wedding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

my cold fusion reactor is not working properly.
please help


7 posted on 08/08/2006 9:54:04 AM PDT by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blowfish
Of course the usual cast of ...scientifically challenged... posters are going to overwhelm this thread

HA! I hear you blowfish! They'll also say things like "It's pretty simple", implying that you're an idiot if you don't see things the way that they do, and it "isn't going to help much", implying that no matter what science shows, it won't change the way they think about the age of the earth. Silly anti-scientists...
8 posted on 08/08/2006 9:55:32 AM PDT by Sopater (Creatio Ex Nihilo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Strange things happen in physics when the temperature approaches absolute zero. Superconduction, a "fourth state" of matter, as relates to liquid helium, appears, and the near-cessation of all molecular movement seems to collapse the very atomic structure of most elements. There may be a very simple explanation of how the alpha-emitter decay of radioactive materials is apparently vastly accelerated.


9 posted on 08/08/2006 9:55:38 AM PDT by alloysteel (My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling, but it Wobbles, and the letters get in the wrong places.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

We need some experiments with Alpha-emitters in cold Drude Metals. Should be pretty cheap. Hope it works out and turns into a useful technology.


10 posted on 08/08/2006 9:55:39 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

I'm not an expert, particularly, but this sounds a lot like cold fusion to me. We shall see.


11 posted on 08/08/2006 9:58:38 AM PDT by Christopher Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater; blowfish

The only folks talking about that stuff on this thread are ... you two. That strawman you're beating is quite dead, I think.


12 posted on 08/08/2006 10:03:13 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Christopher Lincoln
I'm not an expert, particularly, but this sounds a lot like cold fusion to me. We shall see.

This isn't cold fusion, its CON-fusion...............

13 posted on 08/08/2006 10:04:52 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blowfish

Doesn't a material lose its "identity" at absolute zero? Can't the nucleus and electron shells collapse and then re-assimilate into something else?........


14 posted on 08/08/2006 10:06:59 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blowfish
Of course the usual cast of ...scientifically challenged... posters are going to overwhelm this thread of cries of "See, they've proven that decay rates change. It's a young world afterall!" La te da.

As a YEC, I can't see how this explains anything on the timescale. The temps required are far below anything that would occur naturally, so this technique is probably not an explanation.

15 posted on 08/08/2006 10:08:36 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

One of the scientists that I worked with over 20 years ago had an idea about accelerating nuclear decay with powerful magnetic fields. Have not heard anything since then.


16 posted on 08/08/2006 10:08:39 AM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Sounds like someone wants Funding $$$.


17 posted on 08/08/2006 10:10:49 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Radioactive materials emit heat. The lower the temperature to be maintained, the less energy efficient the cooling. Thus, IF the claims are true, accelerated radioactive decay would also mean accelerated heat production which would require tremendous energy for the cooling. A self-defeating proposition.


18 posted on 08/08/2006 10:15:20 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

"Any experts out there care to comment?"

I wrote a whole book on Yucca Mountain, though I'm not really a nuclear expert, just a mechanical engineer. That said, the problem with the schemes to irradiate the waste and knock to a lower state was the problem of unintended consequences. That is, you also make radioactive the containers and metal so it is possible to end up with more volume of waste than you started (even if it is less radioactive), transuranics get created. I suspect similar problems might exist here.


19 posted on 08/08/2006 10:22:18 AM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
cooling the metal to a few degrees kelvin

Tsk, tsk! Physicsweb should know better. You don't use 'degrees' with kelvin.

http://lamar.colostate.edu/%7Ehillger/temps.htm

20 posted on 08/08/2006 10:22:18 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson