Skip to comments.
Reuters drops freelance Lebanese photographer over image
Reuters ^
| 06 Aug 2006
| Reuters
Posted on 08/06/2006 2:51:43 PM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-235 next last
To: PajamaTruthMafia
To: paudio
You've nailed it; they didn't can him for doctoring an image, the canned him for being lousy at it.
22
posted on
08/06/2006 3:05:23 PM PDT
by
kcmt01
To: PajamaTruthMafia
He broke the Reuter's code: Don't get caught.
To: SJackson
Why hasn't somebody posted the altered and unaltered photos ..??
The hubris of Reuters for assuming we are too stupid to notice their BIASED reporting.
24
posted on
08/06/2006 3:06:04 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
To: LibSnubber
and that he made mistakes due to the bad lighting conditions he was working under," Bad lighting conditions, huh? Just where the heck was this pic shot from, anyone know? Is there some vantage point that overlooks the city of Beirut?
25
posted on
08/06/2006 3:06:21 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: mewzilla
They ACTUALLY have standards? I didn't know terrorists, their sympathizers or democrats had standards?
26
posted on
08/06/2006 3:07:06 PM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(Back home in Alabama after 14 years in hell of WA state.)
To: SJackson
Someone needs to go capture quickly.
I saw a link to all his submissions earlier. Others of them had been tampered with.
I'm a dweeb and can't do it.
27
posted on
08/06/2006 3:07:30 PM PDT
by
TASMANIANRED
(The Internet is the samizdat of liberty..)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
Dear Earth,
We're sorry we got caught.
Sincerely,
Reuters
28
posted on
08/06/2006 3:07:38 PM PDT
by
ovrtaxt
(We gotta watch out for the Hellbazoo and the Hamas...)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
"The photographer has denied deliberately attempting to manipulate the image, saying that he was trying to remove dust marks and that he made mistakes due to the bad lighting conditions he was working under,"
Yeh, right!
LOL
Is his photographer related to Baghdad Bob?
29
posted on
08/06/2006 3:08:03 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: RetiredArmy
I didn't know terrorists, their sympathizers or democrats had standards?Joseph Goebbels'.
30
posted on
08/06/2006 3:08:18 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
The photographer has denied deliberately attempting to manipulate the image, saying that he was trying to remove dust marks... He did a good job - he covered them up with all that extra smoke. ;)
31
posted on
08/06/2006 3:08:44 PM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
It took news bloggers to bring it to their attention? They couldn't police it themselves?
32
posted on
08/06/2006 3:08:55 PM PDT
by
Exit148
(Founder of the Loose Change Club. Every nickle and dime counts!!)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
TAQIYYA!! --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiyya
Adnaj Hajj is a taqiyya master. Taqiyya means telling lies to the non-Muslim
Adnaj Hajj will be replaced by another rotten propagandist. Or he'll get re-hired under another name. BECAUSE this guy has the right terrorist connections to get the right propaganda photos
33
posted on
08/06/2006 3:09:41 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(Confucius say man who go through turnstile sideways going to Bangkok)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
When caught, Reuters has strict standards of accuracy that bar the manipulation of images in ways that mislead the viewer.
34
posted on
08/06/2006 3:10:13 PM PDT
by
umgud
(Gov't needs a Department of Common Sense)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
That last set needs barf alerts...
Fake, Fake, Fake
35
posted on
08/06/2006 3:10:25 PM PDT
by
TASMANIANRED
(The Internet is the samizdat of liberty..)
To: All
36
posted on
08/06/2006 3:10:30 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
To: Centurion2000
Reuter standards are much like the 11th Commandment : DON'T GET CAUGHT.Kinda like ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC's et al....
To: mewzilla
And what "dust marks" was stupid trying to get rid of? Dust marks off of digital pics or perhaps dust marks that were getting in the way of all the smoke he wanted seen in the pics?
38
posted on
08/06/2006 3:11:29 PM PDT
by
LibSnubber
(Liberal democrats are domestic terrorists)
To: mewzilla
39
posted on
08/06/2006 3:12:17 PM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(Back home in Alabama after 14 years in hell of WA state.)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
"Reuters and other news organisations reviewed those images and have all rejected allegations that the photographs were staged." More work to be done?
40
posted on
08/06/2006 3:12:50 PM PDT
by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-235 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson