1 posted on
08/05/2006 3:52:32 PM PDT by
Hadean
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: Hadean
Hmmm ... I know roto-rooter news is a tad baised but this is over the top. It's probably doctored.
2 posted on
08/05/2006 3:55:08 PM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: Hadean
Aboslutly sickening, were do we raise our protest?
3 posted on
08/05/2006 3:56:22 PM PDT by
DAC22
To: Hadean
Even a picture isn't worth a thousand words anymore, especially if its from the MSM.
It DOES look like it was abused by the clone tool.
Good catch, LGF!
4 posted on
08/05/2006 3:56:47 PM PDT by
Kieri
(A Grafted Branch (Rom. 11))
To: Hadean
There is no photochopping in this picture!
I was born with an extra finger!
5 posted on
08/05/2006 3:58:49 PM PDT by
DocRock
To: Hadean
dont you need the actual, original photo in order to claim another one is fake?
To: Hadean
absolutely amazing but unfortunately not surprising. what is disgusting is how the sheeple lap up the pap served to them by the MSM.
7 posted on
08/05/2006 3:59:55 PM PDT by
chilepepper
(The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
To: Hadean
Possibly but think of someone blowing smoke rings...
To: Hadean
Yep....doctored to make it look like there's more smoke. Clone Stamp Tool in Photoshop....
I can do the same thing....
11 posted on
08/05/2006 4:03:05 PM PDT by
Dallas59
To: Hadean; All
I hope everyone's saving this pic to their hard drives before Rooter's changes it.
14 posted on
08/05/2006 4:04:34 PM PDT by
RandallFlagg
(Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
To: Hadean
Boy, they need to do something about their pollution there. Algore is going to have a fit when he sees this!
To: Hadean
Looks like they had to clone a LOT of smoke. I'll bet there wasn't 10% of that smoke in the original photo.
16 posted on
08/05/2006 4:04:40 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: Hadean
Can you supply the original Reuters URL for these pictures?
18 posted on
08/05/2006 4:05:44 PM PDT by
docbnj
To: Hadean
The smoke on the left looks very "odd". But someone could come with an off the wall explanation for it's appearance.
However the smoke on the center right shows a similar pattern, so it looks like doctoring to me.
23 posted on
08/05/2006 4:07:17 PM PDT by
MAexile
(Bats left, votes right)
To: Hadean
Definitely looks to me like someone using the Photoshop clone stamp. You can tell that the rounded portion of smoke was copied from the left side of the smoke plume and repeatedly stamped but when they copied it they caught a little of the light colored sky to the left and that was repeated in each stamp. It's clear as day. Each circular portion of smoke, bounded by the lighter color on the left, is identical in size and shape. There's no way that's natural.
26 posted on
08/05/2006 4:08:52 PM PDT by
saquin
To: Hadean
Very poor quality fraud! Someone doesn't know how to use a clone brush!
29 posted on
08/05/2006 4:10:00 PM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(LET ME DIE ON MY FEET, IN MY SWAMP)
To: Hadean
I adjusted the brightness in photoshop by manipulating the light curves and added an arrow to more clearly show the retouching.
To: Hadean
..........Smoke simply does not contain repeating symmetrical patterns like this, and you can see the repetition in both plumes of smoke. Theres really no question about it. Fake but accurate???
(Paging Dan Rather)
35 posted on
08/05/2006 4:10:57 PM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: Hadean
Anyone got an image correlation tool handy? We need to throw some math on this image.
40 posted on
08/05/2006 4:12:50 PM PDT by
HAL9000
(Happy 10th Anniversary FreeRepublic.com - Est. Sept. 23, 1996 - Thanks Jim!)
To: Hadean
To: Hadean
It looks to me as if much or all of the smoke may have been photoshopped in. Some of the buildings in the left background look odd, as well.
First, the plume of smoke on the left. The smoke is not consistent in the lower portions. Where the buildings show through the plume, there are just no pixels of smoke there at all, but the smoke is thick right beside the buildings. The clone stamp tool is so obvious in the upper portions.
Next, the smoke plume on the right. The lower portions are properly fuzzy, but in the upper portions, there are large square areas in the middle of the plume. That is an indication that at least that portion of the plume was added to the photo.
There are odd square pixel formations in the middle plume as well, primarily in the base.
56 posted on
08/05/2006 4:20:17 PM PDT by
jimtorr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson