Posted on 08/04/2006 3:58:01 AM PDT by goldstategop
Liberals love pedophiles, because they must do so to keep their own belief system intact.
Consider the bizarre case just this week of thirty-four year old Phillip Distasio.
Distasio runs a ''school'' called Class Cutters near Cleveland Ohio. The goal of the school is to somehow counter the ''No Child Left Behind Act'' by getting kids to rush through a few academic excercises each day on the computer and then to spend the majority of the time performing some sort of ''community service.'' It seems to be set-up to help the child find ''productive'' use of their time during after-school hours. On Distasio's website he even makes mention that even kids who attend a traditional school can join the program for the ''after-school activities.''
A disturbing element also seems to be that Distasio seeks parent's involvement in ''choosing the curriculum'' that their child engages in. They even have a chatroom blog to log into the program with.
What's really horrifying is that Distasio is an admitted pedophile of 20 years who doesn't even have the decency to be ashamed of his craving for sexual activity with boys.
In fact, he embraces it.
Presently Distasio is finding himself facing 74 charges of molestation of boys in his ''program.'' Instead of denying his guilt, he's trying a new approach – claiming his sexual intent is a civil right.
In my new book ''MuscleHead Revolution: Overturning Liberalism with Commonsense Thinking,'' I point out how painfully obvious it has become to us all that the clear-headed absolutes of right and wrong and good and evil were thrown out with the modern-feminist bathwater of the 1960s. But few of us ever thought it would get to the point that we are now seeing – pedophiles claiming constitutional civil rights protections for their desire to engage in homosexual pedophilia.
So where does Distasio get the boldness to make such ludicrous claims?
How about modern liberalism, academia, and the Clinton administration?
As I document in ''MuscleHead Revolution,'' Judith Levine, the academic who released the book, ''Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex,'' argues that it is harmful to protect children from sexual activity. As I point out, she goes so far as to encourage adults to not think prudishly about sexual activity between adults and children. She even advocates for the ''rights'' of children to be able to ''give their consent'' for ''legal'' and ''healthy'' sexual activity with adults.
One might think that Levine is just a nutcase, except that she was published by the University of Minnesota Press. Her book was endorsed by Dr. Jocelyn Elders who also wrote its forward. Elders was the Clinton era, surgeon general.
Taking his cues from Levine/Elders, Distasio argued in court this week:
''I'm a pedophile. I've been a pedophile for 20 years. The only reason I'm charged with rape is that no one believes a child can consent to sex. The role of my ministry is to get these cases out of the courtrooms.'' Also adding, ''Not all pedophilia is bad, and sex [with boys] can be healthy.''
Sounds like a liberal on a mission; just like Levine.
Since modern liberalism's true goal is the actual eradication of God, moral values, and the ideas of absolute right vs. wrong, it should surprise no one that not a single leftist politician in America has denounced Distasio. Nor did they denounce Levine. The truth is, liberals seek sexual utopia where no rules apply. Restraint has in fact become a dirty word to them. Self control – a throughly foreign concept.
Waging the revolution for all that is true, just, and good involves every single one of us who know better to actively demonstrate this by preventing such an agenda from becoming reality.
For liberals to denounce pedophiles, ultimately they would have to denounce, lesbianism, homosexuality, and their particular favorite – adultery. And that's just not going to happen.
At the end of the day there are such things as moral values, and liberals despise them – because as they see it – those moral values limit their sexual freedoms. And if this is ''America,'' isn't it all about the freedom to get your groove on?
Liberals love pedophiles.
Isn't it shameful?
And don't we all wish they loved the well-being of children more?
The arguments of Phillip Distasio should be greeted with revulsion and horror. Instead, they're entertained in a courtroom. Pray for the children.
(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)
I wonder - whether the concept of a "constitutional right" to sodomy (that 2003 Supreme Court case) and the push for "increased choice" for minors (overturning parental consent for abortion) would be somehow merged in to giving this sick pedophile what he wants.
I can think of nothing more repulsive and sick than pedophilia.
It should be subject to the most severe penalties available.
I beg to differ.
Pedophilia is not the final frontier of the "sexual revolution".
The ugliest depravity you can imagine is not the final frontier, since it is certain that someone can imagine an even more horrific depravity than you.
Pedophilia Chic may eventually becoming socially acceptable.
In my humble estimation, this has already happened. Pedophilia now seeks to become legally acceptable, and the ever lighter sentences we see being meted out indicate that this change is in progress.
.
With the ACLU helping all the way with their defense of NAMBLA.
Scotus declared adult anal sex a right. It is but a short ride to declare sex with minors a God given right too.
Ohio Man Claims Right To Have Sex With Boys
Under 13? Disabled? Autistic?
Life in prison is way too good for this guy.
I don't advocate vigilantism, but SOMEONE has to draw the line!
You have got to be kidding me! This article sounds so bizarre its hard to believe that there are people willing to admit that this is what they really think. Their religion of secular humanism and moral relativism is clearly on display. One would hope that they could be convicted of their false beliefs and repent, but I can't help but smile when I think of the rude awakening they will receive when they must answer to God for their sins - kind of like when I think of homicide bombers looking in vain for their 72 virgins.
Distasio and Distasteful have their first six letters in common. Coincidence?
Actually, I read Distasio's statement as the classic criminal cri de coeur; translating him to English you get: "I am so buggered here, I might as well go out in a blaze of glory." You don't seriously think this defence is going to avail him aught before a judge or jury? -- even lefty liberals have kids.
Indeed, even the other cons in the can where Distasio is going have kids, so Distasio will have to spend his entire sentence -- which ought to be lifelong -- in SHU. (Special Housing Unit, euphemism for solitary/"the cooler").
Now, if he were in Massachusetts, the judges there would allow him conjugal visits with little boys. And the archbishop would ordain him. But he isn't, so mutatis mutandis, he's the one who's buggered this time.
Don't let the door hit you you-know-where, Mr Distasio. Those iron bars be heavy.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
Bump it...
People need to realize how many "laws" have been written to outlaw "discrimination" based upon "sexual orientation".
The politically correct law makers lost all grasp of what a moral foundation is. They did not realize that "sexual orientation" includes EVERY sexual act that a human can perform. (this includes sex with children, animals... etc. etc.)
Pedophiles now have a legal case to do what they want with whoever they want. If you challenge them, you go to court and they will win. Why? Because the law states that you cannot discriminate against their sexual orientation!!
This "school" looks like it would appeal to liberal, Bush hating parents, who are against No Child Left Behind just because it came from him. Also, the progressive 'curriculum' is popular with the 'enlightened' set. I would be interested to know if any of these parents are even bothered by this news, and if so, how forgiving they are going to be.
...just ask for a trial by jury. They'll never convict you.
While I would never want to go to jail, there are definately some things worse. Like letting this man live. If it were one of my boys, and this man declared it was his right to molest them, I would not hesitate in shooting him dead.
Why not? Mohammed did it.
Muslim version:
Allah loves the little children,
All the little children of the world
Red and yellow, black and white
Loaded down with dynamite
Allah loves the little children of the world.
I'd "Love" to see them all have their B*alls cut off after 1st conviction + 25 years, mandatory-minimum.
2nd Conviction--Yes 2nd, 3rd, 4th, happens all the time--Life without parole.
END OF PROBLEM!!!
That's the idea of some, apparently. Go step by step and all the sudden look where we are.
Sad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.