Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The National Security Collapse of the Democratic Party
Hugh Hewitt ^ | 08-01-2006 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 08/01/2006 6:25:25 PM PDT by Bratch

I have already posted on Democratic Congressman John Dingell's extraordinary equivocation about the nature of Hezbollah: "I don't take sides for or against Hezbollah; I don't take sides for or against Israel."

Both Dean Barnett and I have posted on the decision of Demcoratic leadership in both House and Senate to make the November campaign a referendum on cutting-and-running from Iraq.

The New York Times on Sunday endorsed Joe Lieberman's challenger and Kossputin's creation Ned Lamont because of the senator's support for the war.

Now RawStory reports on Congresswoman Lynne Woolsey's "The Iraq War Powers Repeal Act of 2006," which has, incredibly, garnered 22 co-sponsors.

Incredibly, the Democratic Party's commitment to national security has collapsed. It is absurd to even argue the case. If Democrats regain power in either House, they will oblige the country to retreat across a broad front in the war with Islamic jihadism, weakening Israel in the process, emboldening Iran even beyond that country's already extraordinary fanaticism, and committing the country to --at best-- a fortress America approach. When, as would inevitably happen, a jihadist government obtained WMD, the country would not be able to return to the battlefield, and those WMD would inevitably find a use somewhere in the world.

The country is confronted with the Iran/Syria/Hezbollah threat, and with a new threat in Somalia, and the Democrats want to retreat and hope for the best.

There isn't much point in arguing with the left about the folly of their proposed path. What's absolutely necessary is that the center-right prevail in November. The ABC Coalition noted below is a great place to focus energy, but I note ElectionProjection's grim outlook, and want to suggest we start by assisting the four GOP incumbent senators who are best positioned to win crucial close contests:

Montana's Conrad Burns

Ohio's Mike DeWine

Missouri's Jim Talent

Pennsylvania's Rick Santorum

Each is a very solid, very committed vote for victory in the war and clarity about our enemies. Each is opposed by a Democrat whose election will push the Senate towards policies of defeat and retreat.

In an interview yesterday with Neil Cavuto, President Bush explained the sort of focus he brings to the war, which is exactly the focus the GOP and center-right voters need to bring to elections' impact on the war. Cavuto quoted Victor Davis Hanson and asked the president is the country had forgotten that we are in a war. The president replied that indeed some have forgotten that crucial fact. He continued:


But I know it's a war and I think about it every day of my presidency.

I think about Al Qaeda every day. I'm asking questions all the time: Are we doing everything we can to protect this country?

And I want the American people to know that, even if they don't think that we're still at war, I do, and, therefore, will deploy the — the assets of the federal government to protect us here at home and to bring the people who — who intend to hurt us to justice.

An, at the same time, I fully understand that the ultimate long-term solution to the problem of Islamic totalitarianism is — is freedom. And what people are seeing today is a — is a clash between those who advance freedom and those who have a — an ideology based upon hate.

And, so, I have got two big issues, Neil, as we go into the future. One is to remind people we're still at war, but have them comfortable with the fact that the government's doing everything we can to protect them; and, two, to remind people that the terrorist activities of a Hezbollah or an Al Qaeda or a militant Hamas, are all linked, that they may not be coordinating together, but they have this kind of same attitude and same desire to stop the advance of democracy. The long-term peace for America will come when liberty is unleashed in the Middle East, and a policy that had excused tyranny in the past simply didn't work.

It may — the world may have looked safe, but, on September the 11th, we learned that the resentment caused by tyrannical societies could cause great harm to the American people.

So, to me, my presidency is — you know, I think, a lot about the economy, a lot about the questions you asked —but I spend most of my time thinking about how to protect the American people in what is a dangerous world.


The Democrats fundamentally reject this world view. They just don't believe it. And that's why the elections of the fall are so important, and why you should dig deep for these four senators, as well as other candidates as you are able.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2006; democratmeltdown; hewitt; hughhewitt; lostdems; nationalsecurity; nra; unfit
"So, to me, my presidency is — you know, I think, a lot about the economy, a lot about the questions you asked —but I spend most of my time thinking about how to protect the American people in what is a dangerous world."
1 posted on 08/01/2006 6:25:26 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bratch

Dingle supports Hezbollah.

Most Democrats support Hezbollah

Michael Moore supports Hezbollah

Cindy Sheehan supports the "Freedom Fighters" The same Rats who killed Her son.

They are all insane.


2 posted on 08/01/2006 6:33:10 PM PDT by LtKerst (Lt Kerst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

Is Dingbat Dingle up for reelection this year? No surprise there's no MSM firestorm over this-imagine if a Republican had made such comments!


3 posted on 08/01/2006 6:37:26 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch
As far as the dems are concerned, they follow the albore mantra. The President is playing on our fears.

As tho we have nothing to fear.

As tho there are no enemies out there wanting to destroy our country.

As tho there are no enemies right here in the US just biding their time to harm innocent civilians.

4 posted on 08/01/2006 6:38:31 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LtKerst

Good post. Thank you.


5 posted on 08/01/2006 6:41:07 PM PDT by Toadman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LtKerst
Hey Demorats, didn't you all walk out on Iraq's PM because he didn't condemn Hezbollah?

I though it was laughable when the Dems cried their fake anger at him. Just as much as I find it incredibly upsetting and dangerously shortsighted when the Left/Dems/Socialists expresses their fake support of Israel and fake condemnation of terrorists in general while doing everything possible to destroy Israel and assist in the terrorists in defeating the U.S..

God help the Free World if the Dems win/steal power any time before the Sun runs out of fuel.
6 posted on 08/01/2006 6:43:18 PM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

The only way to help Republicans win the Senate race in Montana is to get Conrad Burns to withdraw from the race. So far, he won't consider it.

Any other well-known Republican would have a better chance of winning.


7 posted on 08/01/2006 6:43:45 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (illegal aliens commit crimes that Americans won't commit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch
I added the NRA keyword to the thread.

Rep. Dingle has been a staunch supporter of 2nd Amendment rights for his entire political career. I think he is sincere in his beliefs.

Therefore, when the NRA gives him an A rating, I would hope the NRA members would look at his actions beyond the 2nd Amendment when voting, and give his opponent a second look.
8 posted on 08/01/2006 6:48:24 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I would add banglist to the keywords, but some posters took offense to it on a previous article regarding Rep. Dingle.
9 posted on 08/01/2006 6:50:52 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Dingell is the originator of the "jack-booted thugs" quote. Because of his 2nd Amendment stance, it's hard to completely despise him. I see him as a slightly more liberal Lieberman.


10 posted on 08/01/2006 6:52:48 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (404 Page Error Found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I am aware of his jack boot thug statement.

I am also aware of his voting record per the 2nd Amendment.

I am net defending him. I just want the NRA voters to understand what they are voting for.

Hopefully, a candidate with good NRA and GOA credentials will run against him.
11 posted on 08/01/2006 6:58:21 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bratch
The DemocRats should learn the old adages or proverb, "No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism."
12 posted on 08/01/2006 7:19:13 PM PDT by FreeRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frank_2001

Dingle is a Representative in the House. All Representatives are up for re-election every 2 years.


13 posted on 08/01/2006 7:19:29 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: speekinout
Dingle's seat has been in his family for 73 years. It's apparently a hereditary position.
14 posted on 08/01/2006 7:26:16 PM PDT by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Wow - I didn't know it had been that long! Pretty soon the family will equal Byrd's record in the Senate. :-)

I don't understand why people keep voting for the same-old, same-old. But they do. (sigh)


15 posted on 08/01/2006 7:31:37 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

Thanks for the post. It's an important reminder that sitting home in November is not an option for patriots.


16 posted on 08/01/2006 8:49:25 PM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson