Skip to comments.
Dingell: What's Wrong With Hezbollah?
Powerline ^
| July 31, 2006
| John Hindraker
Posted on 07/31/2006 4:09:43 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets
Yesterday, Representative John Dingell of Michigan appeared on a Detroit television program along with Republican Candice Miller. They discussed the crisis in Lebanon; Dingell proclaimed himself neutral. "I don't take sides for or against Hezbollah; I don't take sides for or against Israel." Asked, "You're not against Hezbollah?" Dingell answers, "No..."
Listen to it here on YouTube, or use our player below.
If the Democrats win control of the House of Representatives, Dingell will be the Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. He was one of the eight Democrats who did not vote in favor of the Congressional resolution supporting Israel in its conflict with Hezbollah.
TOPICS: Government; Israel; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: 109th; antisemite; banglist; dingell; hindraker; moonbat; nra; typicaldemocrat; yourelectedofficials
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: pankot
I have, and you're right.
41
posted on
07/31/2006 7:14:40 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Al Qaeda / Taliban operatives: Read the NY Times, for daily up to the minute security threat tips.)
To: JasonC
He may have a sizable Black Muslim contingent as well.
42
posted on
07/31/2006 7:15:13 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Al Qaeda / Taliban operatives: Read the NY Times, for daily up to the minute security threat tips.)
To: lancer
I agree. Dingell is one dumb and misguided dingbat.
43
posted on
07/31/2006 7:15:55 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Al Qaeda / Taliban operatives: Read the NY Times, for daily up to the minute security threat tips.)
To: sheik yerbouty
I just used the word myself to describe him. It sure fits.
44
posted on
07/31/2006 7:16:29 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Al Qaeda / Taliban operatives: Read the NY Times, for daily up to the minute security threat tips.)
To: dennisw
45
posted on
07/31/2006 7:31:42 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(Confucius say man who go through turnstile sideways going to Bangkok)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
We live in such a frightening day when people like this guy exist, and actually were elected to office.
To: Delphinium
What's really scary is that his party may once again control one house of Congress and even worse, he may be in a leadership position.
47
posted on
07/31/2006 7:50:23 PM PDT
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
To: Dark Skies
Of course he was trying to get support in Detroit. HezbAllah is big in the Detroit Muslim community.
48
posted on
07/31/2006 8:44:48 PM PDT
by
gafusa
To: SJackson
Democrats aren't antisemitic...Well, not to paint with a broad brush, but I don't recall any Republican (other than Buchanan, who, as you said, has left the GOP because he's not welcome) running for or serving as president or running for or serving in either house of Congress making an antisemitic remark or gesture publicly in my lifetime. Contrast that with Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, James Moran, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Ernest Hollings, the afformentioned John Dingell, Charlie Rangel, Cynthia McKinney, Ron Dellums, Gus Savage, and a list almost too long to spell out.
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
...Democratic incumbency is lifetime tenure, like civil service, or the papacy...Or like a federal judgeship!
To: justiceseeker93
Publicly, James Baker. Bush One should have dealt with that, he didn't. Even marginally, other than Duke, reviled by Republicans, and the House candidate from Tn in 04, also reviled, I don't think there are any in the last 20 years or so. The Republican Party does a far better job of reviling these bigots than the Dems, who look at them as votes. But no, they get no credit.
51
posted on
07/31/2006 9:08:51 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do!)
To: MikeA
So I guess Democrats will boycott any congressional speeches by Dingell, walk out on him, demand he apologize, demand he clafify his position, demand he retract,... just like they did with Iraqi PM Malaki last week.You hit the nail on the head: they're the party of hypocrisy (amongst other things such as lies and fraud)!
To: SJackson
Now wait a second: Did James Baker say anything
publicly or was what he said off the record and brought out by hearsay? And wasn't it the same hypocritical Democrats who made light of it (it was only questionably antisemitic, even if accurately quoted) for political gain?
And David Duke wasn't running for Congress, but for the Louisiana state legislature.
To: justiceseeker93
Off the record? He said it, like Carter, off the record, and Hillary, off the record. Duke was state, largely reviled by Republicans as he should have been. Other than the keynote speaker at the 92 convention, who thought soome of his supporters should be brought into the party. But then he's not a Republican either. The Congressional candidate excapes me, in TN, 04 I think, bu not worth mentioning.
As an issue, who hates Jews more, Republicans or Demorcrats, and that's really the issue, goes no where.
54
posted on
07/31/2006 9:31:51 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do!)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
What's really scary is that his party may once again control one house of Congress ... Tend to doubt it this year. Bush's popularity rating has been edging up the last few months, which translates to bad news for the Dems! Admittedly, though, there's three months to go.
To: SJackson
As an issue, who hates Jews more, Republicans or Democrats,..., goes no where.As a Jew, I think the answer to that question is pretty clear, and that's what the other folks on this thread have been saying. The problem is that a lot of goyim can see it more clearly than many Jews who remain addicted to the Dummycrats and choose to be blind to what they see.
To: Admin Moderator
Is it possible for you to remove banglist from keywords? This doesnt belong to it either...
57
posted on
07/31/2006 10:50:38 PM PDT
by
gnarledmaw
(I traded freedom for security and all I got were these damned shackles.)
To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my miscellaneous ping list.
58
posted on
07/31/2006 10:56:15 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
To: MikeA
So I guess Democrats will boycott any congressional speeches by Dingell, walk out on him, demand he apologize, demand he clarify his position, demand he retract, blah, blah, blah just like they did with Iraqi PM Malaki last week. Right?
&&
Well said!
59
posted on
08/01/2006 5:56:48 AM PDT
by
Bigg Red
(Never trust Democrats with national security.)
To: Yehuda
Yiddish posting police, probationary member....
&&
LOL!
God bless and keep Israel.
BTW, (another Goy here) why is it capitalized? Are there gender inflection forms?
60
posted on
08/01/2006 6:00:42 AM PDT
by
Bigg Red
(Never trust Democrats with national security.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson