Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WMD Truth Is Out
Investors Business Daily ^ | July 25, 2006 | IBD

Posted on 07/29/2006 10:01:33 AM PDT by FairOpinion

Edited on 07/29/2006 10:09:04 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Americans are waking up from a distorted reality. Half now believe that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. That's up sharply from last year, when only 36% believed that he had banned weapons.

The numbers, from a Harris Poll conducted earlier this month, showed

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: davidkay; documents; gwot; harmonydatabase; harmonydocs; iraq; iraqiwmds; kay; rockefeller; saddam; scrubbed; syria; terrorism; waronterror; wmd; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: butternut_squash_bisque
"Shouldn't we have INTELSAT pics of the truck caravans moving that stuff out of Iraq?"

If pictures we have of this, then they are still most likely classified.
61 posted on 07/29/2006 11:42:11 AM PDT by roaddog727 (Bullsh## doesn't get bridges built.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: B.O. Plenty

If it doesn't work via the ballot box and political pressusre, then I'm perfectly fine with teh alternative method, to be quite frank.


62 posted on 07/29/2006 11:45:18 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin
"Bush lied, liberals cried"


63 posted on 07/29/2006 11:46:05 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

http://americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=5685
Dems trying to cut off funds for translating these documents.


64 posted on 07/29/2006 11:49:34 AM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Smorch

You could call them Zombies from the Dawn of the Dead. Once the bite of socialism pierces their flesh, they become transformed; walking to the tune of the Culture of Death.


65 posted on 07/29/2006 11:57:38 AM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
While more than 48,000 boxes of military documents have been captured since Baghdad fell, fewer than 100 have been studied

Why so few? Are there that few Arab speakers around to translate them?

66 posted on 07/29/2006 12:05:19 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
Rockefeller's confession

On Sunday John posted a lengthy excerpt from Senator Jay Rockefeller's meltdown with Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday. Many readers wrote to point out the following exchange:

WALLACE: Now, the President never said that Saddam Hussein was an imminent threat. As you saw, you did say that. If anyone hyped the intelligence, isn't it Jay Rockefeller?

SEN. ROCKEFELLER: No. The — I mean, this question is asked a thousand times and I'll be happy to answer it a thousand times. I took a trip by myself in January of 2002 to Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria, and I told each of the heads of state that it was my view that George Bush had already made up his mind to go to war against Iraq — that that was a predetermined set course which had taken shape shortly after 9/11.

This admitted trip to Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria by Rockefeller in January 2002 still bothers me greatly. Do you have an opinion on why JR made this trip? What? Four months after 911 and his view that George Bush had already made up his mind to go to war against Iraq — that that was a predetermined set course which had taken shape shortly after 9/11.

What did JR know and when did he know it?

What was Jr's purpose in giving a heads-up to these friends of Saddam a year before the start of the war?

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/012271.php Posted by

67 posted on 07/29/2006 12:10:58 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: StillProud2BeFree; jveritas; the Real fifi

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1674278/posts?page=64#64


68 posted on 07/29/2006 12:13:28 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: BARLF

Sorry,

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/012271.php


69 posted on 07/29/2006 12:15:08 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
No matter how compelling the evidence, 37% of the voting public would say they don't believe it.
70 posted on 07/29/2006 12:24:49 PM PDT by kempo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
They better wise up or they will go from this zombie state...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

To this...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

71 posted on 07/29/2006 12:26:28 PM PDT by AdvisorB (For a terrorist bodycount in hamistan, let the smoke clear then count the ears and divide by 2.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin

that there is no point in arguing with them.


$$$$


When you accept the fact that their political viewpoint is their religion, then you can accept the fact that arguing is useless. However, pointing out that they "believe" their truths without facts BECAUSE it is their religion, is a satisfactory way to end a discussion. That and laughing at them (unless you are talking to a friend or a relative or someone with whom you have to keep a continuing relationship.


72 posted on 07/29/2006 12:36:55 PM PDT by maica (Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle --Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GW and Twins Pawpaw

I find the best weapon is to be amused by their naiveté, then mention some easily verifiable, but not in the mainstream facts, like the weapons being moved to Syria, when they protest, dismiss them as uninformed. Nothing gets under their skin more than being laughed at, especially politely, for their ignorance. They like to think of themselves as “the informed intelligencia”, nothing motivates them to learn like knowing you think them “Provincial”.

Enjoy your conversations with liberals, if life isn’t fun, your doing it wrong.. /Philosophy


73 posted on 07/29/2006 12:38:38 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Happy is a good word for IBD editorials. They are consistently conservative in their columns and cartoons. A nice respite from the trash that is written in so many papers.


74 posted on 07/29/2006 12:39:15 PM PDT by maica (Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle --Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: maica

I have found their articles to be well researched in the past too. They held no punches when covering the WorldCom/MCI and Comcast investigations.


75 posted on 07/29/2006 12:45:33 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: aflaak

ping


76 posted on 07/29/2006 1:14:59 PM PDT by r-q-tek86 (** Tagline Removed By Admin Moderator **)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

You are correct and your tagline speaks volumes.:-)


77 posted on 07/29/2006 2:16:14 PM PDT by GW and Twins Pawpaw (Sheepdog for Five [My grandkids are way more important than any lefty's feelings!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I, for one, have never stopped thinking that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. As early as 2003, the mainstream media itself gave regular reports of empty canisters of poisonous gas and stockpiles of "conventional" missiles being found throughout Iraq. Somehow, those failed to meet the designation of "weapons of mass destruction," but I am sure that they would have caused quite a bit of mass destruction had the U. S. allowed Saddam to keep and expand upon them.

I am
G. Stolyarov II
http://www.panasianbiz.com
http://www.thebizofknowledge.com
http://www.zhonghuarising.com
http://www.risingsunofnihon.com
http://rationalargumentator.com


78 posted on 07/29/2006 2:42:30 PM PDT by G. Stolyarov II (http://rationalargumentator.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butternut_squash_bisque
===Shouldn't we have INTELSAT pics of the truck caravans moving that stuff out of Iraq?====

This might be a start:


79 posted on 07/29/2006 2:53:32 PM PDT by OnRightOnLeftCoast (U.S. government: Voluntary domestic laws and policies assuring self-destruction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rhombus; All
===I'm sorry to say that to the "Bush-lied" crowd satallite pictures of trucks would be...just trucks.===

Like here. I couldn't find the link of a photo shopped pic. The line of trucks spelled out 'W M D.' Dems would still say it was just trucks.


80 posted on 07/29/2006 3:06:40 PM PDT by OnRightOnLeftCoast (U.S. government: Voluntary domestic laws and policies assuring self-destruction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson