Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big-box 'living wage' passed, Chicago
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | July 26, 2006 | FRAN SPIELMAN

Posted on 07/26/2006 2:39:50 PM PDT by jaydubya2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: jaydubya2

I think they are all Bozos on that Bus....

61 posted on 07/27/2006 4:40:05 AM PDT by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calamari
I'll bet they can design a perfectly good store that will fit into 89,999 Sq. Ft.

Wouldn't do them a bit of good. The council meets on a regular basis. They'd just change the rule.

62 posted on 07/27/2006 4:49:06 AM PDT by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Will and Dupage counties wait their arrival. Wal-marts and Costco, etc. grow out here like the cornfields they replaced and still can't match the expanding population growth out here.

Why? We're all ex-Chicagoans who got tired of Chicago and all its nonsense. Unlike the Windy City, you can even buy foie gras out here too.
63 posted on 07/27/2006 4:52:31 AM PDT by toddlintown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Junior

"Sounds to me like Chicago just handed an economic boom to the surrounding towns and cities."

Chicago did that years ago. Will and Dupage counties are the fasting growing areas outside of Chicago.


64 posted on 07/27/2006 4:54:52 AM PDT by toddlintown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2
There is only one thing that will ever solve this.

But Atlas is a pathetic sucker and will never shrug.

65 posted on 07/27/2006 4:59:44 AM PDT by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2

The rats are in terrible trouble. To be relevant they are having to resort to the basest level of class warfare.

The shism in the black/union coalition evident in this article should send shivers down Rat strategist spines.


66 posted on 07/27/2006 5:00:28 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
It all comes down to the envy of petty little people.

Yep. When the stock boy starts making high level corporate decisions, maybe he can get paid more, too... In the meantime, the company won't collapse if the paper cups end up on the wrong end-cap.

67 posted on 07/27/2006 5:01:21 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2
Chief sponsor Ald. Joe Moore: “Our job is not to safeguard the profit for the world’s wealthiest corporations. Our job is to look out for our constituents,’’ he said.

What a moron. By passing this travesty, he is guaranteeing that many of his constituents won't have jobs.

Liberals in general are an ignorant lot, but Illinois liberals elevate stupidity to a whole new level.
68 posted on 07/27/2006 5:08:34 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Get off my lawn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2


I would love for Walmart to keep the same prices as elsewhere then add "Chicago 'living wage' fee" to the bottom of the ticket. That will set so many asses alight, you'll hear howling for 100 miles in any direction.


69 posted on 07/27/2006 5:14:22 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
There are Targets and Target says it will pack up and leave if this law passes.

Simple economics. The store, whether it is a Mom-n-Pop or big box WallyWorld, Target, etc. passes taxes, wages, utilities, rent and other overhead costs on to their customers.

The City Council just voted a "tax" on their constituents disguised as something good for them which they call a living wage.

But the living wage they voted to approve only applies to those working at the stores.

The increase in prices passes to everyone in the city who shops there.

Now the stores must decide, do we stay and put up with this bit of socialism and have to listen to the employees at other stores complain about their wages and demand that their city councils also pass laws to give them raises or do we move and say "No more taxes to you city council, no more of your constituents have jobs with us for any wage, if your constituents want cheaper prices now they have to drive 20 extra miles."

Most importantly, they move their operations and send a clear signal that it is their business and not the city councils'.

In short, this is a small scale version of "outsourcing" jobs. When the cost of doing business becomes onerous, move to a more acceptable economic climate.

Saying, "Welcome to Wal-Mart" should not be a job which guidance counselors recommend.

70 posted on 07/27/2006 5:27:01 AM PDT by N. Theknow ((Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The face of socialism. Keep that pic for future reference.


71 posted on 07/27/2006 5:38:20 AM PDT by CSM ("Most men's inappropriate thoughts end as soon as the girl talks..." - Dinsdale, 5/30/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2
Forget it. Daley has no spine and he will get re-elected anyway.

By 2010, when this goes into effect, every major chain store in the Chicago area will close and relocate to outlying areas in the region. As a result, hundreds, if not thousands, of jobs will be lost, sending Chicago's economy into a freefall.

Whether the people of Chicago will respond with a complete change in Aldermen remains to be seen.

72 posted on 07/27/2006 6:42:20 AM PDT by Houmatt (Democrats eat urinal cakes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

Sounds like it is time to move away or be stuck in a liberal heaven.


73 posted on 07/27/2006 7:20:08 AM PDT by Calamari (Pass enough laws and everyone is guilty of something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: houeto

You're probably right.

They will succeed in driving business outside the city limits and not benefit from any expansions.


74 posted on 07/27/2006 7:33:36 AM PDT by Calamari (Pass enough laws and everyone is guilty of something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
There are Targets and Target says it will pack up and leave if this law passes. The dem aldermen say that Target is bluffing.

We'll see.

The aldermen need to realize that big companies like this almost never bluff, especially in press releases. The plaintiff's lawyers have already put companies' feet to the fire on saying things in public that they don't mean.

75 posted on 07/27/2006 3:35:20 PM PDT by Toskrin (It didn't seem nostalgic when I was doing it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Calamari

I live in Texas, but have been noticing liberal enclaves keep collapsing and losing population. I'm just wondering how we take these places back after the last working person leaves.


76 posted on 07/27/2006 3:55:50 PM PDT by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2

Just out of curiosity, how big is the Marshall Field building downtown and what do they pay per hour?


77 posted on 07/27/2006 4:02:43 PM PDT by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irish guard

Forgot to add.....wouldn't it be ironic if that operation hires all kinds of part-timers for under $10.00, has more than 50,000 square feet and they inadvertently screwed one of the nicer downtown retail establishments?


78 posted on 07/27/2006 4:06:13 PM PDT by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Calamari

Wal-mart put one that size in north Tampa, don't go in, it's way to small. Any store smaller than 200,000 sq is just to small.


79 posted on 07/27/2006 6:11:49 PM PDT by Ricebug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: irish guard

I can't answer your question about thier wage, but it's no longer Marshall Fields, it is now Macy's.


80 posted on 07/28/2006 5:50:15 AM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson