Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Chickenhawk'
Boston Globe ^ | July 23, 2006 | Jeff Jacoby

Posted on 07/23/2006 6:38:41 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative

``IT'S TOUCHING that you're so concerned about the military in Iraq," a reader in Wyoming e-mails in response to one of my columns on the war. ``But I have a suspicion you're a phony. So tell me, what's your combat record? Ever serve?"

You hear a fair amount of that from the antiwar crowd if, like me, you support a war but have never seen combat yourself. That makes you a ``chicken hawk" -- one of those, as Senator Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey, defending John Kerry from his critics, put it during the 2004 presidential campaign, who ``shriek like a hawk, but have the backbone of a chicken." Kerry himself often played that card. ``I'd like to know what it is Republicans who didn't serve in Vietnam have against those of us who did," he would sniff, casting himself as the victim of unmanly hypocrites who never wore the uniform, yet had the gall to criticize him, a decorated veteran, for his stance on the war.

``Chicken hawk" isn't an argument. It is a slur -- a dishonest and incoherent slur. It is dishonest because those who invoke it don't really mean what they imply -- that only those with combat experience have the moral authority or the necessary understanding to advocate military force. After all, US foreign policy would be more hawkish, not less, if decisions about war and peace were left up to members of the armed forces. Soldiers tend to be politically conservative, hard-nosed about national security, and confident that American arms make the world safer and freer. On the question of Iraq -- stay-the-course or bring-the-troops-home? -- I would be willing to trust their judgment. Would Cindy Sheehan and Howard Dean?

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: antiwar; iraq; jacoby; liberalism; military
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last
To: Mr.Smorch
["FDR and Lincoln never served in the military. I don't think James K. Polk had military credentials...."]

Hold on here. The job of a President of the United States is to MOTIVATE people - particularly those individuals in the US Congress. That is what's makes successful President.
81 posted on 07/23/2006 10:26:36 PM PDT by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Heh. Don't consider it a pet peeve of yours. I used the incorrect word and you are correct, thanks for the assistance.


82 posted on 07/23/2006 10:44:26 PM PDT by Marius3188 (Happy Resurrection Weekend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: TVenn
Are you eligible for the National Guard or Reserves?

You do understand that a great power, in order to sustain itself, in addition to fielding a superior military, must also maintain a thriving economy. Yes?

Also, it might comfort you to check up on the latest recruiting and reenlistment numbers.

Or you can continue to sanctimoniously demand that everybody run on down to the recruiting office.

And while we're at it, why don't you tell us all about your service?
83 posted on 07/23/2006 11:39:17 PM PDT by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

"And, on the other hand, Jimmy Carter served in the military and gave us the mullahs in Iran."

And we cannot forget the lovable Bill Clinton who dodged the draft and ran with his tail between his legs to study in Moscow.



84 posted on 07/24/2006 1:06:58 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Democrats - The reason we need term limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TVenn

If only those that serve deserve to be President, then only those who serve deserve to vote.

Maybe the RATS can argue that point.


85 posted on 07/24/2006 1:08:49 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Democrats - The reason we need term limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: WayneM

exactly. here is a classic example of people who dont understand democracy. they are talking about only expressing your opinion in a military dictatorship...as i recall they dont tend to work very well...


86 posted on 07/24/2006 1:17:39 AM PDT by Irishguy (How do ya LIKE THOSE APPLES!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Khepera

Yes, and maybe it could be incorporated into the "Barf Alert" somehow.


87 posted on 07/24/2006 4:22:31 AM PDT by AdvisorB (For a terrorist bodycount in hamistan, let the smoke clear then count the ears and divide by 2.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic

My point was that these POTUS' served their country admirably as Commander-in-Chief, so maybe a "chickenhawk" that the left mindlessly chortle every chance they get, is not such a bad thing afterall.

BTW, Marius3188 reminded me that Lincoln did indeed serve in the Blackhawk War as a member of the militia. Polk was in the state militia. He was elected Captain (I guess the grunts had secret ballots back then) and then was promoted to colonel. So the leftist weasals couldn't slur them about being "chickenhawks."


88 posted on 07/24/2006 4:27:57 AM PDT by AdvisorB (For a terrorist bodycount in hamistan, let the smoke clear then count the ears and divide by 2.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Smorch

IIRC, Lincoln was the captain of a local militia unit during the Blackhawk wars, circa 1845.


89 posted on 07/24/2006 4:42:48 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

"I'd guess you never served."

Well, no, and neither have a whole lot of other people, including most of the civlian folks "running" this war. But that doesn't make a differnce, does it?

Are you saying that if you served you can magically divine the collective opinion of the servicemen and women over there and if you haven't served you can't?

I assume from your reply that you have nothing other than your "feelings" on this?


90 posted on 07/24/2006 5:38:03 AM PDT by Gone GF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: TVenn
Did I miss the part where Jeff Jacoby explains how with his nation at war he is too important or to valuable at home to serve?

One does not necessarily wear a uniform when serving one's country. Mr. Jacoby's where he needs to be.

91 posted on 07/24/2006 5:50:01 AM PDT by MortMan (There are 10 kinds of people in the world... Those that understand binary and those that don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TVenn
No one that never served deserves honor or respect for placing their personal safety at risk for their country.

If we are ALL soldiers, then who are we fighting for?

92 posted on 07/24/2006 5:51:14 AM PDT by MortMan (There are 10 kinds of people in the world... Those that understand binary and those that don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TVenn
Did I miss the part where Jeff Jacoby explains how with his nation at war he is too important or to valuable at home to serve?

Give it a rest.

93 posted on 07/24/2006 5:53:00 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: familyop
IMO, the self-described "paleocons" are part of the pantywaist/traitor problem.

I agree with you.

94 posted on 07/24/2006 7:02:59 AM PDT by rdb3 (Walking again, with neither cane nor crutches. Imagine that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: TVenn

And do you think Jeff Jacoby would win a Medal of Honor?

The list of writers who have excelled at military service is pretty paltry. I'm not sure most writers are cut out for it. Kurt Vonnegut and James Michener both served honorably in World War II. If they received any special awards, however, none of their biographies mention it.

I do playwrighting as a hobby. I was talking with my playwrighting teacher. We both have some military experience. One thing we had in common was that neither of us could march. At all. In general, writers just aren't good at clearing their mind and focusing on the physical task at hand.

This skill of singular focus on a physical task is pretty important in many aspects of the military, and usually not an area where writers excel. Let me use myself as an example. While I'm not in the same league as Michener or Hemmingway, I do think I have the mind of a writer.

I was one of the two worst sailors in my unit at boot camp. I've had success in many areas of life, and I gave it my all at boot camp. And yet, marching and firefighting and perfect towel folding just never came easy to me. (On the other hand, when I came home and gave a presentation on boot camp to sailors who hadn't yet gone, a number of people told me it was the best presentation on the subject they had ever seen.)

While I have gotten a great deal from my military experience, I am not convinced that I would be a great sailor to have around in a combat situation.

I'm not saying writers are better than servicemen and women. Their skills are both needed, but tend to be very different.

Anyway, Jacoby is a very good writer. Why should he spend his time being a mediocre member of the military? Does society benefit by that trade?


95 posted on 07/24/2006 11:28:58 AM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gone GF

"I assume from your reply that you have nothing other than your "feelings" on this?"

Just don't understand, do you? Those who served, especially in a combat zone, give much more than their time, they give a portion of their soul and when people such as yourself begin casting pebbles, rocks, etc. toward their cohorts now serving, we all get sort of testy and begin to inquire about those who clearly didn't go thru the experience.

As to the people running the war, GWB served and volunteered to go to VN. Rumsfeld, like GWB, was a pilot, though earlier. When you say "those running the war," I presume you're attempting to castigate the two of them - it doesn't wash, you probably don't either.


96 posted on 07/24/2006 8:27:30 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson