Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Chickenhawk'
Boston Globe ^ | July 23, 2006 | Jeff Jacoby

Posted on 07/23/2006 6:38:41 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative

``IT'S TOUCHING that you're so concerned about the military in Iraq," a reader in Wyoming e-mails in response to one of my columns on the war. ``But I have a suspicion you're a phony. So tell me, what's your combat record? Ever serve?"

You hear a fair amount of that from the antiwar crowd if, like me, you support a war but have never seen combat yourself. That makes you a ``chicken hawk" -- one of those, as Senator Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey, defending John Kerry from his critics, put it during the 2004 presidential campaign, who ``shriek like a hawk, but have the backbone of a chicken." Kerry himself often played that card. ``I'd like to know what it is Republicans who didn't serve in Vietnam have against those of us who did," he would sniff, casting himself as the victim of unmanly hypocrites who never wore the uniform, yet had the gall to criticize him, a decorated veteran, for his stance on the war.

``Chicken hawk" isn't an argument. It is a slur -- a dishonest and incoherent slur. It is dishonest because those who invoke it don't really mean what they imply -- that only those with combat experience have the moral authority or the necessary understanding to advocate military force. After all, US foreign policy would be more hawkish, not less, if decisions about war and peace were left up to members of the armed forces. Soldiers tend to be politically conservative, hard-nosed about national security, and confident that American arms make the world safer and freer. On the question of Iraq -- stay-the-course or bring-the-troops-home? -- I would be willing to trust their judgment. Would Cindy Sheehan and Howard Dean?

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: antiwar; iraq; jacoby; liberalism; military
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: West Coast Conservative
After all, US foreign policy would be more hawkish, not less, if decisions about war and peace were left up to members of the armed forces.

I disagree. If you have served and experienced the effects of war, you are less likely to use force and see it only as the last resort.

41 posted on 07/23/2006 8:03:27 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Smorch
During the Black Hawk War, Abraham Lincoln of New Salem, Illinois served three enlistments. Each enrollment lasted for approximately 30 days.

Abraham Lincoln’s Military Service During the Black Hawk War, 1832

42 posted on 07/23/2006 8:05:30 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I served. I saw the effects of war. And force is often my first choice for foreign policy problems.


43 posted on 07/23/2006 8:08:28 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bad company
The use of "chickenhawk" is just a distraction from any real discussion on Iraq.

What I read as his argument was "just because I am not willing to risk my personal safety and comfort, that does not mean Iraq is not worth other people dying for."

Did I miss something?

44 posted on 07/23/2006 8:09:58 PM PDT by TVenn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bad company

"Chickenhawk" refers to those who strongly support the use of military force but avoided military service and combat themselves. It has nothing to do with a particular party.


45 posted on 07/23/2006 8:11:55 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

I served. I saw the effects of war and force is never my first choice for foreign policy problems.


46 posted on 07/23/2006 8:13:10 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
"But my gripe with the neocons comes from what happened in the Balkans and how they never seem to have to answer for their helpfulness to Wesley Clark, Biden, Albright, McCain in turning over so much territory to the Muslims.
The jibe of "chickenhawk" has sticking power--if it didn't, the neocons wouldn't be so intent on playing jocksniffer to John McCain. His war record gives them cover."

I normally avoid this stuff, not even sure what a neo-con is supposed to be.
But the lady has nailed this one as well as it can be nailed:
the contrast/hypocracy/selective memory is (or are) repulsive.

PS: Lincoln ran through a bucket full of generals before he found Grant, his main strengths were tenacity & willingness to ignore intended restraints ... not uncommon in megalomania.

47 posted on 07/23/2006 8:17:25 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TVenn

I'm sure Jacoby is just waiting for the military draft, which John Kerry promised would occur if Bush was elected.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A35517-2004Oct15.html


48 posted on 07/23/2006 8:17:51 PM PDT by Krusty (I used to think I was well-informed until I met the FReepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188
He fell in love with the Navy

I recall reading that once, when the moonbats of his day accused him of allowing Pearl Harbor to get us in the war (Roosevelt Knew! He knew what?), he said he would never do anything to harm the Navy, he LOVED the Navy.

49 posted on 07/23/2006 8:19:32 PM PDT by ichabod1 (I have to take a shower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TVenn
What I read as his argument was "just because I am not willing to risk my personal safety and comfort, that does not mean Iraq is not worth other people dying for."

Did I miss something?

Reading comprehension.

50 posted on 07/23/2006 8:22:46 PM PDT by bad company (When Chuck Norris goes to bed at night, he checks his closet for FReeper kanawa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TVenn

You've never been a journalist, you have no right to comment, according to idiot lib reasoning


51 posted on 07/23/2006 8:24:53 PM PDT by MadLibDisease (I wouldn't even call it a disproportionate response if Israels kill ratio was 100:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TVenn

I never served. Does that mean that now I should go out and pull off the "Support our Troops" signs on my vehicle? Does that mean I should also surrender the "Support our Troops" license plate on my vehicle?

Since I never served, does this mean now that I should never be allowed to have any opinion what so ever on whether or not U.S. military force should be used?

I suppose that we could logically extend this further and say that anyone who never served in the Israeli armed forces should not have any opinion about Israel using force to chase down terrorists.

How far do you want to go with this? Where is the limit?

I a man. I have never given birth. Therefore I should have no opinion in any way about abortion?


52 posted on 07/23/2006 8:25:54 PM PDT by dbehsman (NRA Life member and loving every minute of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: kabar
"Chickenhawk" refers to those who strongly support the use of military force but avoided military service and combat themselves. It has nothing to do with a particular party.

And it is always used by people that have lost every other arguement on whatever conflict they are discussing. It is used as a last ditch effort to discount the opinions of those that they disagree with.

The premise put forth by the persons using the chickenhawk slur is that people that have not served in combat are not allowed to argue in favor of combat. Taking that to it's logical end, we could no longer elect a president that had not served in combat lest we not be able to defend ourselves if attacked.

53 posted on 07/23/2006 8:33:53 PM PDT by bad company (When Chuck Norris goes to bed at night, he checks his closet for FReeper kanawa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
And, on the other hand, Jimmy Carter served in the military and gave us the mullahs in Iran.

Hey Red, Do you have a link on Carter's Iran FUBAR? There are a couple of libs I know that think Carter was a great Prez. I'd like factual ammo to prove them wrong.

Thanks.

54 posted on 07/23/2006 8:35:20 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dbehsman
I never served. Does that mean that now I should go out and pull off the "Support our Troops" signs on my vehicle? Does that mean I should also surrender the "Support our Troops" license plate on my vehicle?

Are you eligible for the National Guard or Reserves?

55 posted on 07/23/2006 8:37:47 PM PDT by TVenn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

One who has not served in the military is not necessarily a coward. Many who haven't served are in fact quite courageous.

Most who have served (~ 95%, last I saw some numbers) are what we combat soldiers called "REMFs"--a vulgar acronym meaning "rear-echelon" [something] [expletive]. I have much respect for non-combat people who served, though, because the hardest part for most is being away from home. Some of them also work(ed) around the clock, at times.

Combat and other specialties that taught overall tactics did teach much about what our military is capable of (with current and obvious positioning and strategy, occupying Iran very quickly and relatively easily, for one).

But some civilians put a lot of effort into learning about what our military forces can do. Some of those who try to learn are very concerned about our national security. Others did many years of education and do research to improve our warfighting capabilities. Many civilians do their part, and my hat is off to them.


56 posted on 07/23/2006 8:39:38 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TVenn

Before my mother married my dad she married a pilot ...This was at the beginning of WW2...He was flying supplies around the US for the military...His plane went down and he was killed. Did for his country?

My dad was a grunt in Okinawa..He got jungle rot and pneumonia and was sent home....did he serve his country?
My cousin was a Marine in Viet Nam in 1965 ...All his friends died and he was shot.He came back and became a really bad alcoholic.
My brother dropped out of college, was drafted in 68 and was trained as a medic. He figured he was off to get shot in Nam ...so he got drunk and married ....then was sent to Colorado to treat GIs with VD...did he serve his country?

I smoked dope, went to college, got a high draft #, was nuts and deaf ...the military wisely chose to leave me alone.I dont claim to have have served my country but I can be as pro war as I want.


57 posted on 07/23/2006 8:45:25 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: bad company
The premise put forth by the persons using the chickenhawk slur is that people that have not served in combat are not allowed to argue in favor of combat.

I think it is more appropriate to use that term when describing those who are quick to advocate the use of military force, but intentionally tried to avoid military service themselves. Ergo, it is ok for others to risk their lives just as long as I don't have to. Kerry, Murtha, Zinni, et. al. have used it against Cheney, Perle, and others who managed to avoid service in Vietnam. We have used "draft dodger" against Clinton.

I agree it is meant to silence or demean those who support our military intervention in Iraq.

58 posted on 07/23/2006 8:46:24 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: xzins
When doing agricultural policy, it's good to get all the politicians and their budget and science folks in the room.

But occasionally someone should ask a farmer for his opinion.

Or get Sally Fields to testify. ;-P

59 posted on 07/23/2006 8:49:47 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TVenn
"Are you eligible for the National Guard or Reserves?"

I don't think I am eligible. When I was three years old, I had close to half of my left lung removed due to an abscess. Later on, the lung pretty much grew back to what the normal size should be. I do not know if the military would have taken me or not. I probably could have pressed the matter and gotten in, but now I doubt that I could get in. I'm 35 years old right now. When the 9/11 attacks happened, I contacted a recruiter about signing up. It happened to be a Marine Corp recruiter. He sent me a generic E-mail stating that I was too old to begin training (at that time I was 30, and he said that the cutoff was 28). There was no other information offered, and I assumed that the 28 year old cutoff age was universal for all branches of the service. A couple of years later, I read about some 32 year old journalist who signed up in the Marine Corp. The made some special exception for him. I guess I should have gone to journalism school.

Currently, given my age and my allergies to cats and dogs, I'm not sure if they would take me.
60 posted on 07/23/2006 8:51:07 PM PDT by dbehsman (NRA Life member and loving every minute of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson