Skip to comments.
Basic Evolutionist Time Sandwich
7/23/06
| self
Posted on 07/23/2006 9:36:42 AM PDT by tomzz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-370 next last
To: js1138
Don't forget Saturn hovering over the north pole.
Bwahahahahaha!
21
posted on
07/23/2006 10:26:51 AM PDT
by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: Senator Bedfellow
22
posted on
07/23/2006 10:28:59 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: ga medic
Just add water...
23
posted on
07/23/2006 10:32:03 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: DaveLoneRanger
24
posted on
07/23/2006 10:32:47 AM PDT
by
tomzz
To: js1138
How about the Felt Gravity Effect? And ascii bats? Feral chickens? The magical gravity-reducing properties of Saturn in a polar orbit?
25
posted on
07/23/2006 10:34:19 AM PDT
by
Senator Bedfellow
(If you're not sure, it was probably sarcasm.)
To: tomzz
Sorry, but actual scientific data trumps simplistic calculations based off of arbitrary parameters and inaccurate models.
26
posted on
07/23/2006 10:34:39 AM PDT
by
Sofa King
(A wise man uses compromise as an alternative to defeat. A fool uses it as an alternative to victory.)
To: MineralMan
So are "Birth Defects" the driving force of evolution, or not?
Maybe it is better not to donate to the March of Dimes, because with the right Birth Defects we could grow wings, and simply fly where we wanted to go, if the weather was nice, and the traffic was bad.
27
posted on
07/23/2006 10:40:27 AM PDT
by
Mark was here
(How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
To: RadioAstronomer
28
posted on
07/23/2006 10:40:48 AM PDT
by
dread78645
(Evolution. A doomed theory since 1859.)
To: Sofa King
The only thing not to like in Haldane's original formulation of the problem was his describing it in terms of "genetic death". For those who would raise that as an objection, Walter Remine has a couple of new papers out which describe the problem entirely in terms of birth rates.
29
posted on
07/23/2006 10:43:12 AM PDT
by
tomzz
To: Coyoteman
Utter nonsenseTypical evolutionist knee-jerk response.
If you stopped for a moment to consider all the starving African children who could be saved if they were provided with one basic evolutionist time sandwich a day, then you'd change your tune.
30
posted on
07/23/2006 10:43:23 AM PDT
by
Hoplite
To: Mark was here
Why do you think making fun of unfortunate people constitutes a good joke?
31
posted on
07/23/2006 10:46:58 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: tomzz
"The only thing not to like in Haldane's original formulation"
You see, here's the crux of the problem. Whether or not you like Haldane's formulation is irrelevant to the fact that it's completely arbitrary. I'm sure that you just love his math, but it's still based off of a model that he custom built to give the results that he wanted and not to accurately represent how evolution works.
32
posted on
07/23/2006 10:48:09 AM PDT
by
Sofa King
(A wise man uses compromise as an alternative to defeat. A fool uses it as an alternative to victory.)
To: Mark was here
Yikes! That would be bad for those of us who work at the only commercial-airplane company in the U.S. By the way, I have never seen any model of airplane - ever after "16 billion years" - mysteriously show up on the flight line. Maybe it will take another 16 billion years???
33
posted on
07/23/2006 10:52:48 AM PDT
by
DennisR
(Look around - God is giving you countless observable clues of His existence!)
To: js1138
Why do you think making fun of unfortunate people constitutes a good joke?
If Birth Defects are how we evolved, they are a good thing, and who are we to challenge life evolving processes.
Besides it may be fun to fly. After all, with Evolution, all things are possible!
34
posted on
07/23/2006 10:52:49 AM PDT
by
Mark was here
(How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
To: tomzz
"That meat clearly is not 70 million years old; I've seen week-old roadkill which looked worse. "
Really ?
Just how old do you think it "clearly" is ?
a week ? a decade ? a thousand years ?
35
posted on
07/23/2006 10:53:36 AM PDT
by
RS
("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
To: My2Cents
Malcolm Muggeridge ? surely not the well known homosexual and Drury Lane Fairy.
36
posted on
07/23/2006 10:55:17 AM PDT
by
Brit1
To: MadLibDisease
37
posted on
07/23/2006 10:56:58 AM PDT
by
MadLibDisease
("Women and cats will do as they please and men and dogs should relax and get used to it" R .Heinlein)
To: RS
I'd GUESS a few thousand years, possibly as much as ten or twelve thousand. After 60 million years, all that would be left would be petrified material.
38
posted on
07/23/2006 10:59:39 AM PDT
by
tomzz
To: Hoplite
If you stopped for a moment to consider all the starving African children who could be saved if they were provided with one basic evolutionist time sandwich a day, then you'd change your tune. You're talking about making real sandwiches out of evolutionists? Don't know if anybody would want to EAT that....
39
posted on
07/23/2006 11:01:12 AM PDT
by
tomzz
To: tomzz
They're not made out of evolutionists, silly, they're made with recovered Dino meat. Tastes like chicken, and meets halal and kosher requirements for humanitarian daily ration meals.
40
posted on
07/23/2006 11:07:38 AM PDT
by
Hoplite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-370 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson