Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Philadelphia may evict Boy Scouts council [unless it changes its policy on gays......]
Press of Atlantic City ^

Posted on 07/22/2006 2:27:11 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Philadelphia may evict Boy Scouts council The Associated Press Published: Saturday, July 22, 2006 Updated: Saturday, July 22, 2006

PHILADELPHIA (AP) - The city said it will evict a Boy Scout council from its publicly owned headquarters or make the group pay a fair rent price unless it changes its policy on gays.

The Boy Scouts' Cradle of Liberty Council, the country's third-largest, has been battling with the city for more than three years over the policy, which like the national Scouts organization forbids gays from being leaders.

City Solicitor Romulo L. Diaz Jr. wrote a letter to William T. Dwyer III, president of the Cradle of Liberty Council, stating that the council's "discriminatory policies" violate city policy and law, and that city officials have not been assured the group will not discriminate.

Unless the city gets a "fair-market rent agreement," the council will be evicted, the letter says.

The group has made its headquarters on a half-acre owned by the city in the upscale Philadelphia Art Museum area since 1928, when the city council voted to allow the Scouts to use the property rent-free "in perpetuity." The Scouts pay for building upkeep.

(Excerpt) Read more at pressofatlanticcity.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: barneyfranklikesboys; bsa; cradleofliberty; gaystapo; godblesstheboyscouts; homosexualagenda; mayorstreetssodom; phillystinksbadly; queerpoliticians; scouts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Sub-Driver; scripter

Can someone clarify this for me please...

Do the Girl Scouts (or whatever they are called) allow male Leaders?... and if not, what is the reason?

If the answer is that they don't allow male leaders, and for the reasons I am thinking, does Philadelphia have the same attitude towards them?


41 posted on 07/23/2006 1:38:41 PM PDT by mikeyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikeyc
Do the Girl Scouts (or whatever they are called) allow male Leaders?... and if not, what is the reason?

We see that question every so often, and it's a good question indeed. I'm not sure the question has ever been answered without imposing a double standard.

42 posted on 07/23/2006 1:44:52 PM PDT by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Is this article just about California?

I live in New England - but was, indeed, in California went the incident took place...in the 70's (The perp was also in LAW ENFORCEMENT! I went to the Sheriff also - got short shrift. I warned him that one day, his dept was going to be very embarrassed - and indeed they were, -

43 posted on 07/23/2006 2:37:24 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
Sorry maine-iac, I had the wrong cut and paste on that post.
44 posted on 07/23/2006 3:38:57 PM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: scripter; mikeyc

Yes, the GSUSA does allow male leaders, but I believe they cannot be "principal leader" (i.e., can't be the top unit leader, such as the Cubmaster or Scoutmaster in the BSA).


45 posted on 07/23/2006 6:43:28 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RonF

**Yes, the GSUSA does allow male leaders, but I believe they cannot be "principal leader" (i.e., can't be the top unit leader, such as the Cubmaster or Scoutmaster in the BSA).**

In which case, it seems only logical that the same rule should apply to homosexuals in charge of boys, for the same reason.

I assume that Philadelphia doesn't prejudice against them... but then, it's the homosexuals who require preferential treatment, above the needs of the children... as usual.


46 posted on 07/24/2006 2:00:19 AM PDT by mikeyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I think a whole stream of Christians should apply for leadership positions in gay organizations and we'll see how equally open they are to leadership that is opposed to their organization's core values.


47 posted on 07/24/2006 2:03:33 AM PDT by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikeyc

"In which case, it seems only logical that the same rule should apply to homosexuals in charge of boys, for the same reason."

And what reason would that be?


48 posted on 07/24/2006 6:59:06 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The REST of the AGENDA:
While most homosexual activist groups publicly denounce NAMBLA and its agenda, the pedophile group is still allowed to march in "gay" pride parades in New York, San Francisco and Boston under its own NAMBLA banner.

Furthermore, some suggest that public disavowal of NAMBLA by homosexual groups is a smokescreen. David Thorstad, a founding member of NAMBLA and former president of New York’s Gay Activists Alliance, says homosexual activists have supressed pedophilia in order "to sanitize the image of homosexuality to facilitate its entrance into the social mainstream."


49 posted on 07/24/2006 11:15:33 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Philadelphia doesn't like "morally straight".

The corrupt left favors that which favors it. Birds of a feather flock together...

50 posted on 07/24/2006 11:24:51 AM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Frumious Bandersnatch
Just to play Devil's advocate:
In a legal sense, sometimes "in perpetuity" can mean indefinitely (i.e. no fixed term of years) and not necessarily forever and ever.

Traditionally, most property courts are loathe to enforce restrictions that permanently tie up property. You know, control of the dead hand and all.
51 posted on 07/24/2006 1:37:34 PM PDT by Balke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
There are a few things I remembered from my BSA days. For three years (1979 to 1981) I went to the Scout Camp at Ransburg off of IN446 by Lake Monroe. What I remembered, the people who were considered the adults including Senior Patrol leader who was around 17 years old, they used separate facilities when they went to shower. The toilets were a different matter since it was a long walk from different parts of the camp. I don't know how much has changed but if the BSA was smart, there would be at least two adults together when dealing with kids - accountability. I usher at my local Church and one rule is when we deal with kids, there are always two adults together especially when we take the 3 & 4 years to the bathroom. In fact, we do NOT enter either unless there is a fight (if any). There are two set of bathrooms and one set are off limits to the adults (kids only). The age cutoff is around 16 or 17.

Recently, I was visiting a local high school for some community things and it was during the school day. I had to use the can but I asked where the "Faculty" restrooms were at and used those even though it was at another part of the building.

The Boy Scouts has been a faggot magnet for decades. Similar incident occurred in CA back in the 60s in the Palo Alto area. Now we have NAMBLA to further the cause of molestation of boys by queers. Sickening, but this is an alternative lifestyle supported by the deviant-mongers and deviant judges.
52 posted on 07/24/2006 1:50:45 PM PDT by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Balke

Oh granted. However, I'll bet that the original town fathers had a different idea than the current setup.


53 posted on 07/27/2006 6:12:07 PM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson