Skip to comments.
Dakota, 12, to star in 'disturbing paedophile film'
Posted on 07/21/2006 8:47:28 AM PDT by Akeirook
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/showbiznews.html?in_article_id=396762&in_page_id=1773
War of the Worlds star Dakota, 12, has signed up to appear in Hounddog.
The screenplay calls for Fanning's character to be raped in one explicit scene and to appear naked or clad only in "underpants" in several other horrifying moments.
A source close to the film said: "The two taboos in Hollywood are child abuse and the killing of animals.
"In this movie, both things happen." Fanning's mother, Joy, and her Hollywood agent, Cindy Osbrink, see the movie, written and directed by Deborah Kampmeier, as a possible Oscar vehicle for the pint-size star.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: badmovies; deviants; hollywierd; hollywoodagenda; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes; perverts; sickos; sicksick; sicksicksick; whiskeytangofoxtrot; wtf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-175 next last
To: gopwinsin04
Tom Ford took that shot? Makes sense.
He's not a photographer...
101
posted on
07/21/2006 10:02:21 AM PDT
by
durasell
(!)
To: Sans-Culotte
Each work has to be judged on its own merits. The 'I already know something is bad' argument means you can't show anything bad.
102
posted on
07/21/2006 10:04:42 AM PDT
by
Borges
To: B-Chan
FYI: Saló is based upon the book The 120 Days of Sodom by the unspeakably evil Marquis de Sade -- one of the most hideously evil creatures evil to walk this Earth, and, naturally, one of the patron saints of the internationl intelligentsia.Thanks, I'd forgotten that. It really disgusted me when they made that movie Quills, that tried to portray the Marquis as merely a victim of censorship, as if he were no more than an 18th century Lenny Bruce. If they made an accurate film of his life, it would be as repellent as anything he ever wrote.
103
posted on
07/21/2006 10:05:43 AM PDT
by
Sans-Culotte
(I hereby re-christen the Republican Party as "The Flaccid Party")
To: Sans-Culotte
104
posted on
07/21/2006 10:06:55 AM PDT
by
Borges
To: durasell
Where are this child's parents?
To: Borges
Salo is not impossible to find. You just need to actually look for it.
Here, and
here, for example.
106
posted on
07/21/2006 10:08:59 AM PDT
by
Houmatt
(Democrats eat urinal cakes.)
To: gopwinsin04
107
posted on
07/21/2006 10:09:04 AM PDT
by
durasell
(!)
To: Houmatt
Well in the days of the Internet I guess everything can be found. I meant in your neighborhood video store.
108
posted on
07/21/2006 10:09:37 AM PDT
by
Borges
To: Akeirook
no wonder people don't go to movies
109
posted on
07/21/2006 10:10:16 AM PDT
by
mel
To: LYSandra
Dakota Fanning 15 years from now:
110
posted on
07/21/2006 10:11:12 AM PDT
by
jdm
(Can I get me a huntin' license here?)
To: Borges
The 'I already know something is bad' argument means you can't show anything bad.Oh, you can show it alright. It's called porn. When children are involved it's called kiddie porn.
I'm saying that the argument used for Salo-that it is vaulable in that it depicts horrors-is a disengenuous one. I think the viewers of it either: a.) get their rocks off watching people eat feces, get raped, tortured and murdered; or: b.) see viewing it as an endurance contest; or: c.) just want the privilege of owning a difficult to obtain title.
I see this new film as being cut from sismilar cloth.
111
posted on
07/21/2006 10:11:43 AM PDT
by
Sans-Culotte
(I hereby re-christen the Republican Party as "The Flaccid Party")
To: red irish
Indeed, this is just screwed-up...
112
posted on
07/21/2006 10:11:53 AM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.)
To: Sans-Culotte
Are 'Romeo and Juliet' and 'Lolita' kiddie porn? The famous 1968 film of the former decpited the underage actors in bed.
113
posted on
07/21/2006 10:13:13 AM PDT
by
Borges
To: stevio
Huh, she does.
114
posted on
07/21/2006 10:13:19 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: stevio
Yes, a young Jodie Foster! You nailed it. I was trying to think of who she looked like. I thought a young Cameron Diaz, at first, but then realized that wasn't a great comparison.
115
posted on
07/21/2006 10:13:43 AM PDT
by
jdm
(Can I get me a huntin' license here?)
To: gopwinsin04
Geez, 12 and she is already anorexic
116
posted on
07/21/2006 10:14:52 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: jdm
A little mean-spirited, no?
Kids like Fanning etc. are working kids. I've known many of them. And while their experiences growing up are vastly different than most kids, the majority leave the business to go on to other things. Some stay with it and either fail or succeed. And some get horribly screwed up -- but that percentage is no greater than kids outside the business.
117
posted on
07/21/2006 10:15:14 AM PDT
by
durasell
(!)
To: Borges
HTML trumps copy link, and paste. Iwuzinahuri. Thanks.
118
posted on
07/21/2006 10:16:33 AM PDT
by
wita
(truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
To: durasell
The two child actresses most notorious for having a film like this in their youth (Foster and Brooke Shields) are as well adjusted and accomplished as any in Hollywood history.
119
posted on
07/21/2006 10:16:50 AM PDT
by
Borges
To: Akeirook
Well,.......
I guess the rating will be a bit higher than PG-13.
Another one to "pass by".
120
posted on
07/21/2006 10:16:55 AM PDT
by
PeteB570
(Weapons are not toys to play with, they are tools to be used.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-175 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson