Skip to comments.
How Young Is Too Young? (Teen Sex)
Agape Press ^
| 7/12/06
| Jane Jimenez
Posted on 07/18/2006 4:42:43 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
At the CDC conference, standing before a crowd of national experts on STDs, Dr. Patricia Sulak sought to find common ground between the "sexperts" and abstinence educators. Surely, she challenged them, we can agree on this one thing. Can't we agree on an age too young for sex?
NO! the room erupted in unison. After all, this is the age of consent. If sex is consensual, that's good enough for them. If you are wondering what the CDC has to say about this ... so am I.
This is just sickeining!
1
posted on
07/18/2006 4:42:47 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: DBeers; DirtyHarryY2K
2
posted on
07/18/2006 4:43:15 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; BIRDS; BlackElk; BlessedBeGod; ...
MORAL ABSOLUTES PINGDISCUSSION ABOUT:
How Young Is Too Young? (Teen Sex)
It saddens me when I see what society is turning into.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To be included in or removed from the MORAL ABSOLUTES PINGLIST, please FReepMail wagglebee.
3
posted on
07/18/2006 4:44:49 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: wagglebee
NO! the room erupted in unison. After all, this is the age of consent.Wow a whole room full of child molesters and thay all have government jobs ?!
Who'd a thunk it ?
5
posted on
07/18/2006 4:48:57 PM PDT
by
ATOMIC_PUNK
( have long feared that my sins would return to visit me and the cost would be more than I could bear)
To: wagglebee
I didn't even realize NAMBLA really existed. I thought South Park made it up.
6
posted on
07/18/2006 4:49:28 PM PDT
by
BackInBlack
("The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice.")
To: cancun
In Mexico the legal limit is 12 years old or 30 kilos, Is that right or wrong? Are you actually being serious?
7
posted on
07/18/2006 4:52:52 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: BackInBlack
NAMBLA really existed
No my FRiend, it is an organized group of pedophiles who actually lobby to be able to legally rape young boys.
8
posted on
07/18/2006 4:53:50 PM PDT
by
GrandEagle
(God bless the USA! May God grant our forces safety and victory on the battlefield!)
To: wagglebee
Are you actually being serious? It's raining noobs today.
9
posted on
07/18/2006 4:54:19 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: wagglebee
He signed up today. hmmmm, me thinks something stinks.
10
posted on
07/18/2006 4:54:44 PM PDT
by
dmw
(Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
To: wagglebee
"I think she still holds it against me."
Rim shot please.
To: wagglebee
It seems to me people with out children or(those with that don't give a sh*t] are making the rules.
12
posted on
07/18/2006 4:56:06 PM PDT
by
oyez
(The way to punish a providence is to allow it to be governed by philosophers. --Frederick the Great)
To: cancun
Well, if you don't mind your 12 year old daughter gettin it on at that age, then I guess it's just fine and dandy.
13
posted on
07/18/2006 4:56:16 PM PDT
by
dmw
(Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
To: wagglebee
I've got an easy answer for those experts... Too young is when you are not able to be personally responsible for the possible consequences of your actions (Physically, Financially, Emotionally, or otherwise). This is regardless of one's spiritual or faith-based views on the subject.
I mean isn't this a basic moral value that has nothing to do with sex at all? It's called PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY, for gosh sakes!!! No wonder they are having such problems with this idea, the majority of these people most likely support socialistic economic policies so they would see nothing wrong with these future teen parents ending up on the public dole -- all the better to control them, I guess...
As for some of the other concerns - like NAMBLA, that kind of stuff enrages me as it seems like some of this is a push on the part of abusers to take away the stigma of child abuse and such. THAT is where this just gets absolutely reprehensible. Don't these "sexperts" get educated in the very real effects of sexual abuse, or do they believe it's a myth or something crazy like that? Age differences for example when dealing with adults and teens -- there is a huge opportunity there for the adults to manipulate and control the teens. Anyone who doesn't see that should have their head examined, IMHO...
To: LibertyRocks
15
posted on
07/18/2006 4:59:07 PM PDT
by
dmw
(Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
To: LibertyRocks
The problem with that answer is that it excludes heterosexual sex (the responsibility being the resulting human life) but gives full rein to homos, including NAMBLA.
The age of consent should be 18 for everyone. What is the problem with that? We no longer live in an agrarian society where you need 20 kids so you have to start at 15. We live considerably longer as well, so lovers can enjoy each other's company for a lot longer, notwithstanding the wait. Of course over 1/2 of them will be divorced at some point, so maybe that's wrong.
To: LibertyRocks
I've got an easy answer for those experts... Too young is when you are not able to be personally responsible for the possible consequences of your actions .... That's it, in a nutshell.
17
posted on
07/18/2006 5:01:29 PM PDT
by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: BackInBlack
I didn't even realize NAMBLA really existed. I thought South Park made it up.
They did make up the North American Marlon Brando Look-a-like Association, but not the pervert club.
18
posted on
07/18/2006 5:02:43 PM PDT
by
digitalbrownshirt
(http://digitalbrownshirt.blogspot.com)
To: wagglebee
If they aren't old enough to raise and provide for children they concieve, they aren't old enough to have sexual relations.
19
posted on
07/18/2006 5:03:53 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Bad spellers of the world - UNTIE!,)
To: LibertyRocks; wagglebee
Too young is when you are not able to be personally responsible for the possible consequences of your actions (Physically, Financially, Emotionally, or otherwise). Good summary. My version is that you're old enough for sex when you are ready to be married, self-supporting parents to a baby.
20
posted on
07/18/2006 5:04:28 PM PDT
by
Tax-chick
(Whiskey for my men, hyperbolic rodomontade for my horses.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson