Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Watchdogs And Lap Dogs (Media Bias)
Investors Business Daily ^ | July 15, 2006 | IBD

Posted on 07/15/2006 8:01:23 PM PDT by FairOpinion

That a left-of-center bias grips the old media is undeniable. Too many years of content analyses and newsroom surveys close the case. So how do journalists in denial press on?

They accuse their colleagues of being "lap dogs."

It doesn't get more serious than the recent dispute over The New York Times's spilling of a classified counterterrorist program. But that spat with the administration, indeed over a serious breach of the national security, climaxed decades of the media's steady drift to the left.

Some prominent figures in the establishment media, lapsing into momentary honesty, do admit the diagnosis. The late ABC anchor Peter Jennings a few years ago spoke candidly about liberal dominance at the networks — and then went back to tilting his broadcasts against Israel.

Newsweek's senior editor Evan Thomas, in 2004, blurted out that his colleagues would boost Sen. John Kerry's vote tally.

A few strata below these media stars, however, you can find an orchestrated effort to distort reality — a practice in which the players are expert — into an accelerated left-directed agenda. According to a spate of books and a decreasingly important newspaper trade magazine, the problem — get this — is the media's rolling over for the Bush administration's war machine.

You read that right.

The purpose is clear: Defy journalists to prove they're not "lap dogs."

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 4thestate5thcolumn; biasmeanslayoffs; bush; cialeak; congress; enemedia; gramsci; gwot; ibd; leaks; mediabias; medialeak; msm; neryorktimes; nyt; partisanmedia; trysellingthetruth; waronterror; wot
The MSM is shifting further and further not only to the left, but into supporting terrorists and undermining the US, endangering the lives of Americans, just to accomplish their real agenda: the destruction of the US.

The MSM was so terribly upset over the disclosure of Plame's name, which was of a bsolutely NO adverse consequence to anyone, but cheerfully keeps disclosing top secret information, which does help the terrorists and undermines our ability to fight the terrorists.

1 posted on 07/15/2006 8:01:25 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Gosh, could people be figuring out that you're not shooting straight on this forum? Heaven forbid that they perceive you as a shill for the current Administration or just a megalomaniacal nut seeking self-justification for the Neocon cause. Far be it from me to tell other members how you've gone out of your way to promote this President's goals over conservative common sense. Nope, I wouldn't spill those beans.
2 posted on 07/15/2006 8:27:53 PM PDT by NewRomeTacitus (Always voted conservative & voted for Bush twice. No more lesser evils!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

lap dogs?

Helen Thomas pug
Dan Rather basset hound
Katie Couric squirrel

I suppose they consider they reporters who ran interference for clinton on everything from corruption to rape to be the equivalent of lassie or rin tin tin.


3 posted on 07/15/2006 8:41:10 PM PDT by attackcartoons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; All
From my file "89% Voted"--

 

Public disclosure: Media are finally admitting their biases.

Professor's Study Shows Liberal Bias in News Media


CyberAlert -- 05/07/1996 -- NQ CyberAlert
... recent Freedom Forum survey of Washington reporters and bureau chiefs revealed 89
percent voted for Clinton versus 7 percent for Bush in 1992. Do you think the ...

Great Debate#9
... opinions skew their professional writing. Nuzzo pointed out that a 1995 Freedom
Forum survey showed 89 percent of the media voted for Bill Clinton while the ...

Break up Microsoft?...Then how about the media "Big Six"? [ ...
... Why? They're usually wrong. 92% voted for Clinton. Libertarians, by contrast,
much enjoy being Right. You may (continue to?) derive your understanding of ...

-Poll confirms Ivy League liberal tilt--

The Politics of Hollywood
Uncommon Knowledge ^ | July 20, 2001 | Peter Robinson
A poll by the Center for the Study of Social and Political Change in 1992, eighty-three percent of film and television writers, directors and producers voted for Bill Clinton. Eighty-three percent. The vote that Clinton received in the country at large, forty-three percent.

No Bias in Media, ha ha, tee hee

4 posted on 07/16/2006 1:23:49 AM PDT by backhoe (Has that Clinton "legacy" made you feel safer... yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson