Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Airbus to fly in the face of critics in display of bravura at Air Show.
The Business Online ^ | 16 July 2006 | Ross Tieman

Posted on 07/15/2006 11:06:36 AM PDT by lowbuck

European aerospace firm, EADS, will this week launch a drive to restore its credibility before the world’s aerospace industry at the Farnborough Air Show in Hampshire.

The centrepiece will be a flying display by the A380 super-jumbo – the world’s biggest airliner – along with a series of presentations by Airbus, the airliner manufacturing subsidiary that accounts for 80% of EADS profits.

Instead of launching the A350 medium-sized long-haul plane with which it hopes to compete with Boeing’s hot-selling B787 Dreamliner, as it had earlier hoped, Airbus’s new boss Christian Streiff, will update airlines on overhauling the A350 design.

Thomas Enders, the German co-chief executive of EADS, set the tone last week, when he said Airbus was in no rush to launch the revised A350 design – expected to be renamed the A370.

Enders conceded Airbus had “underestimated” Boeing’s B787, which has secured more than 400 orders from the world’s airlines though it won’t take to the air until 2008. Airbus has gone back to the drawing board with the A350 and is now determined to produce a larger plane that will outperform Boeing’s B787 and B777 models.

Enders said Airbus was working on the revised A350 design, expected to cost E8bn ($9.8bn, £6.5bn) to develop, “but we don’t feel linked to any particular calendar,” he said. Having lost the race to be first to market, Airbus must produce a substantially better aircraft to capture orders.

The scale of Airbus’s strategic error in developing a super-jumbo while its US rival focused on a smaller long-haul plane was illustrated last week, when Boeing revealed it had booked more orders of up to 480 aircraft in the second half of June, while Airbus orders were reduced to 117 planes, mostly for its short-haul workhorse, the A320.

But Airbus is hoping to unveil new orders at Farnborough, including possible orders from Lufthansa, the German airline, for its A380, which sold only 159 aircraft.

When problems were revealed a month ago showing that manufacturing the A380 pushed delivery delays to more than a year, EADS shares fell 26% in a single day. The company subsequently shed Airbus chairman Gustav Humbert and EADS’s French co-chief executive, Noël Forgeard.

Enders last week praised the “Prussian virtues” of Forgeard’s replacement, Louis Gallois, and said EADS and Airbus would focus on reliability – including delivery dates.

Gallois, former head of the French state rail operator SNCF, threw himself into his new job with zest, visiting EADS’s troubled Mérignac site at Bordeaux to unveil the sale of EADS’s aircraft maintenance arm, Sogerma, to French industrial company TAT, saving 500 jobs.

EADS also began to highlight its achievements. Despite the A380 manufacturing problems, Airbus will deliver more than 400 planes this year, a new record, Enders said. Defence sales to the French government are expected to double, and ATR, the Toulouse-based manufacturer of turbo-prop regional aircraft, owned 50/50 with Italy’s Alenia, is expected to double sales this year as airlines switch orders from fuel-thirsty regional jets.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: a350; a370; a380; airbus; b787; boeing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
It would appear that the A350/A370 will not be annonunced at Farnborough according to this article.

Therefore, I assume the "new management" is going to get their ducks in a row before promising airlines the moon.

1 posted on 07/15/2006 11:06:40 AM PDT by lowbuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lowbuck

"Airbus to fly in the face of critics in display of bravura at Air Show."


ahahahaha I peed myself.. almost. somehow I thought of a stupid kid trying to show the world he's a big boy.. LMAO


2 posted on 07/15/2006 11:08:26 AM PDT by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck
The scale of Airbus’s strategic error in developing a super-jumbo while its US rival focused on a smaller long-haul plane was illustrated last week, when Boeing revealed it had booked more orders of up to 480 aircraft in the second half of June, while Airbus orders were reduced to 117 planes, mostly for its short-haul workhorse, the A320.

If they attend to the marketplace, rather than simply trying to outdo the Americans, they might have half a chance, if they get lucky.

3 posted on 07/15/2006 11:17:29 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck

Seems a name change might be in order within a few years.

I recommend: AirTrailways...


4 posted on 07/15/2006 11:23:34 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Al Qaeda / Taliban operatives: Read the NY Times, for daily up to the minute security threat tips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon

Maybe they'lll try an upside down runway flyover to prove something :)


5 posted on 07/15/2006 11:28:50 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck
"Enders said Airbus was working on the revised A350 design, expected to cost E8bn ($9.8bn, £6.5bn) to develop"

How much of that will come in as hand outs from the EU governments, under the guise of "loans"?
6 posted on 07/15/2006 11:32:16 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck
European aerospace firm, EADS, will this week launch a drive to restore its credibility before the world’s aerospace industry at the Farnborough Air Show in Hampshire.

That could end badly.

7 posted on 07/15/2006 11:32:26 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Make them go home!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck

How many times do I have to say this? Buy Boeing, a tried and true aviation company.


8 posted on 07/15/2006 11:36:43 AM PDT by Quark606
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
Yes, the European version of penis envy! The A380 is a huge mistake given the direction international air travel is going.

So now while they busy themselves "going one better" on the B787, while expending a lot of resources to get the A380 out of the door, I suspect the Boeing people are planning the replacement for the 737 using their new technology from the 787.

What this will do to the A320 "5% better program" (warmed over A320 like the A350 being a warmed over 330) is good enough is not going to be pretty! The 787 is causing the 330/340 to die a slow death. The 320 was a good aircraft, but, they don't have the money/cash flow to meet the coming threat of the 737 replacement.
9 posted on 07/15/2006 11:37:22 AM PDT by lowbuck (The Blue Card (US Passport). . . Don't leave home without it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Seems a name change might be in order within a few years. I recommend: AirTrailways...

AirBust?

10 posted on 07/15/2006 11:41:38 AM PDT by operation clinton cleanup (Iran IS the great Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
The A380 works just fine. Empty. ;)

Fully loaded, it's still overweight. It can dazzle people at airshows without being able to meet the airlines' specifications.

The A380 will eventually be a minor success. But they've lost so much time fiddling around with it that to get the A350-A370 back into the game, they are going to have to price it well below the 787.

11 posted on 07/15/2006 11:46:26 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck

Will they be able to put the wheels up this time? They do go up dont they?


12 posted on 07/15/2006 11:47:47 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

It might end up like the Rotodyne. It it will be an astounding feat, but it simply might not generate that much revenue.


13 posted on 07/15/2006 11:52:05 AM PDT by Quark606
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
"The A380 will eventually be a minor success."

I don't know, they have so much money sunk into development and I understand that they have discounted so deeply to get the initial orders that they may need somewhere north of 400+ sales to break even.

I had thought that the 380F would save their hide, but, now believe that the existing 747 and 777s will outsell them because they do not require any special airport modification to handle them.
14 posted on 07/15/2006 11:58:08 AM PDT by lowbuck (The Blue Card (US Passport). . . Don't leave home without it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup

"AirBust?"

How about Greyhound Exress, our dog get you there faster.


15 posted on 07/15/2006 11:59:51 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck

"The A380 will eventually be a minor success."

in America this is called losing!


16 posted on 07/15/2006 12:02:59 PM PDT by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck
The centrepiece will be a flying display by the A380 super-jumbo – the world’s biggest airliner...

The Airbus A380, a fly-by-wire airplane with -gasp- wiring problems.

Thanks anyway, mon ami.

.

17 posted on 07/15/2006 12:04:54 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner
A no show or problem with THAT flyover -- and Airbus is Airbust.

The best rule of thumb to follow -- If it ain't Boeing you ain't going.

Inform your favorite airlines.....

Semper Fi
18 posted on 07/15/2006 1:11:25 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lowbuck
What is Boeing going to do they only have one nuumber left. The 797 hasn't been used yet as far as I know (disclaimer) The 717 never was used except under a different name for the military I think (disclaimer) The 707 did have it's own song!I once heard a stand-up comedian say something about like this (disclaimer)

"Why would any body with a brain want to fly in a plane that's name sounds like a part fell off in a cartoon?"

I guess I don't have a brain (disclaimer) I like the 767.

19 posted on 07/15/2006 1:25:04 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (Red is good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas

Right after buying McDonnell-Douglas they updated the MD90/82/80/DC-9 and called it the 717. Shortly thereafter, they killed it.

About their type number progression. If they think that one 7 in a model number is sufficiently lucky, they could go on adding 10 for each new model. So after the (yet-to-be-conceived) 797, they would go to the 807.

Which would warm the cockles of the hearts of us old Elektronikers, just as the 807 tube warmed the insides of many a WWII radio transmitter.


20 posted on 07/15/2006 2:50:00 PM PDT by Erasmus (<This page left intentionally vague>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson