Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mollusk fossils push back evolution, ROM scientists say
The Globe and Mail ^ | 7/13/06 | UNNATI GANDHI

Posted on 07/13/2006 6:12:42 AM PDT by doc30

Mollusk fossils push back evolution, ROM scientists say

Life 560 million years ago more advanced than previously believed, article says.

Two Canadian paleontologists have discovered dozens of fossils of a soft-bodied, deep-sea dweller that lived more than half a billion years ago, adding one more piece to the enigmatic puzzle that is the history of life on Earth.

The 189 well-preserved fossil specimens of Odontogriphus omalus have been interpreted as the world's oldest known soft-bodied mollusk, and were found in British Columbia's mountains in the Burgess Shale, one of the most important fossil sites in the world.

The newly discovered fossils are remarkable, one of the researchers notes, because there are perfect impressions of all of the animal's soft tissues.

The fossils show the early mollusk had an oval body ranging in size from a few millimetres to 20 centimetres with simple gill-like structures surrounding a muscular sole or "foot" on the underside.

The stomach, intestines, outer membrane and mouth are all visible.

This discovery pushes back the history of animal evolution tens of millions of years to 560 million years ago in Precambrian time (543 million years ago and earlier), according to the Royal Ontario Museum's David Rudkin, co-author of the article published in today's issue of the journal Nature.

Very few fossil specimens have been found from that time period. The Cambrian Period (543 million to 490 million years ago) marked the sudden appearance of complex multicellular macroscopic organisms.

In the Precambrian era, before the so-called explosion, organisms were thought to be much simpler, but this study shows that was not the case.

"This is a crucial interval in evolutionary history because it seems to represent a time in which a great deal happened," he said.

"Odontogriphus seems to be a late holdover that somehow got preserved in with the creatures from the Cambrian . . . opening up new windows on evolution for us," Mr. Rudkin said.

The specimens were collected over 15 years in the late 1980s and 1990s by the ROM and, upon closer examination, were found to have distinguishing "molluskan" features including a specialized feeding structure called a radula, made up of short rows of small, tooth-like elements that would wave and sweep food into the mouth.

The shell-less mollusks grazed on seafloor bacterial growths.

Odontogriphus, which translates to "toothed riddle" was originally discovered in 1976 from a single, poorly preserved specimen. Until now, it has been described as an "enigmatic organism," according to the study's lead author, Jean-Bernard Caron, also of the ROM.

"Our study redescribes and reinterprets previously unrecognized features that link Odontogriphus to the mollusks, one of the most diverse and important groups of animals living today," Dr. Caron said.

Odontogriphus predates modern-day mollusks -- with 200,000 living species today including snails, clams, squids and octopuses -- which began to develop hard shells during the Cambrian Period to survive.

"They were the last of their kind and they were dying out because the sea floor was changing and all these other animals started developing hard parts and new strategies for dealing with predators," Mr. Rudkin said. "The successful mollusks are those that branched off and developed shells."

Mr. Rudkin said the fact that many mollusks have survived such a catastrophic extinction could shed light on the evolutionary path many animals may take.

"Those lessons we learn from the past -- about where groups of organisms originated, when they become extinct, how they became extinct, or if they didn't become extinct entirely, how they recovered from extinction -- we use that kind of historical background to help us predict what might happen in modern extinction circumstances. Maybe there's a lesson in there for us."


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cambrian; crevolist; evolution; mollusk; pavlovian; precambrian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last
To: freedumb2003

NO!.......


21 posted on 07/13/2006 6:32:27 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith

Looks like a OdorEater!.............Or a Gel Shoe Sole!.........


22 posted on 07/13/2006 6:33:29 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Well, now you can bet on the PRE-Cambrian Explosion! before anyone gets wind of it!.......
23 posted on 07/13/2006 6:35:31 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doc30

BTW, What is a ROM scientist? Read Only Mollusks?........


24 posted on 07/13/2006 6:37:13 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
Shirley you jest.


25 posted on 07/13/2006 6:39:43 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Let them die of thirst in the dark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD
"THe criteria for being a real scientist in this group is swallowing any evolutionary theory hook line and sinker in lock step without a hint of debate."

No debate? You can't be serious.
26 posted on 07/13/2006 6:39:44 AM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman (Gas up your tanks!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

ROM = Royal Ontario Museum. It's an internationally well regarded natural history museum in Toronto, Ontario. The place is huge and very interesting. Hard to see everything in a day.


27 posted on 07/13/2006 6:39:49 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD
THe criteria for being a real scientist in this group is swallowing any evolutionary theory hook line and sinker in lock step without a hint of debate.

Beep! Circle takes the square. Would you like to try again?

BTW, you've never given me your explanation of the Theory of Evolution. Would you care to rectify this oversight now?

28 posted on 07/13/2006 6:40:05 AM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Looks like a OdorEater!.............Or a Gel Shoe Sole!.........

Are you gellin'?

29 posted on 07/13/2006 6:40:51 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Let them die of thirst in the dark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: doc30

I'm surprised that a Helen Thomas pic hasn't been posted .........yet........


30 posted on 07/13/2006 6:44:40 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Junior; RadioAstronomer; Physicist
What are the criteria for being a "real scientist?"

One who uses scientific thinking, and the methods of science in the acquisition of reliable knowledge. (Click the link.)

31 posted on 07/13/2006 6:45:19 AM PDT by ASA Vet (3.03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doc30
Interesting, but not new news. Congress is filled with spineless mollusks.

Also, the extinction of this particular mollusk was likely due to global warming, which was Bush's fault.

32 posted on 07/13/2006 6:45:37 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Don't call me Shirley.


33 posted on 07/13/2006 6:46:18 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Thanks for the informative link.


34 posted on 07/13/2006 6:47:36 AM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
NO Helen Thomas pic ===> Placemarker <===
35 posted on 07/13/2006 6:49:15 AM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wbill

"Congress is filled with spineless mollusks"

Yes, but the difference is that they aren't Pre-Cambrian! (Well, maybe some of them...)


36 posted on 07/13/2006 6:49:31 AM PDT by VRWCer ("The Bible is the Rock on which this Republic rests." - President Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Scientists find Michael Moore's old Shoe liners and claim they're tens of millions of years old fossils.............


37 posted on 07/13/2006 6:56:09 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

38 posted on 07/13/2006 6:59:13 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"The Cambrian Period (543 million to 490 million years ago) marked the sudden appearance of complex multicellular macroscopic organisms."

Doesn't sound like evolution to me. Sounds more like GOD!.....


Don't bank on what you just said, because the article is saying that the "sudden appearance" increasingly looks like it's not sudden. Complex multicellular macroscopic organisms already existed, and that's what this fossil discovery shows; it just happens that they didn't have bodies that fossilized well.

I'd imagine that once hardshells starting appearing, it was such an incredible adaption that the mutation spread quickly, since the softbodied animals were now the equivalent of giant sea marshmallows. Looks like that's the secret of the "explosion".
39 posted on 07/13/2006 7:01:30 AM PDT by Seamoth (Kool-aid is the most addictive and destructive drug of them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: doc30
This is a good thing. It shows that scientists know the limits of current knowledge and are capable of recognizing the importance new findings when they occur. When new facts emerge, existing theories are modified or discarded, depending on the nature of the new evidence. This finding of pre-Cambrian complex animal life fits very well with evolutionary theory.

What it really shows is that scientist will do anything to try to disprove the Cambrian explosion, they have been trying for years. I will wait until all the facts are in, the dating of these fosils may be off a tad, because some scientist(read most all of them) will fake, cheat, lie, steal and falsify findings in order to prove a theory.

I am NOT a creationists, but to jump on this as if it disproves the significance of the Cambrian is just idiotic.

That all fossils before the Cambrian were "soft" bodied is an old theory and unprovable, as so many postulations from evos are. It was put forth in order to "explain" the Cambrian and scientists have been looking for proof for many years, and now, suddenly, someone finds a "soft" body creature, a complicated one, that supposedly dates before the Cambrian, and all of you die hards jump on it as if there has never been a dating error made, or facts lied about, in the history of evolutionary theory.

Don't cry to hard if this proves to be just another fake, designed to fit a theory that so far has been unprovable!

40 posted on 07/13/2006 7:10:24 AM PDT by calex59 (The '86 amnesty put us in the toilet, now the senate wants to flush it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson