Posted on 07/12/2006 8:09:50 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
Susan Estrich?
Susan Estrich?
Interesting. But Sean would probably go even more crazy. lol.
She seems a bit more civilized than she used to be. I really cannot see her taking the line that she doesn't know whether Bush brought down the Twin Towers (and by the way struck the Pentagon) or not. Not that she would have said those words in the past, but she just seemed more out of control before. LOL
The second article, not Cinnamon's, is even better. Many witnesses saw and have testified to seeing the buildings buckling and compressing minutes prior to the collapse. Explosives don't operate slowly.
Don't hold the name someone's parents gave them against them, just not right, I think.
This is how the left covers for Clinton enabling terrorists just so he could keep himself from being investigated.
Now who is ignoring facts?
Did they see the flashes minutes before the collapse? Do you not realize that a collapsing building, with electricty and massive steel beams, furniture and desks burning and starting to sag would most likely flash as well?
If explosives, witnesses wouldn't have reported seeing the building bowing and such minutes before it finally collapsed.
Like I said, there are just too many holes to believe any of the conspiracy theories when visual and common sense says otherwise.
"Would it be crazy to suggest that al Qaeda had a back-up plan to make sure that the towers fell?"
I often wondered about this. I've read a lot of the "conspiracy" sites and such.
How hard would it have been for the terrorists to a) plant bombs before the strike or b) dress as first responders and plant bombs during the confusion -- it's not like they would be ones worried about getting out. With everyone focused on rescue I think it may have been rather easy with the right "props" to get in there...
Planting the bombs to make sure they fell would also be "good" from the terrorists point of view as they would not only get the civilians, but first responders as well thereby causing more panic, confusion, and pain. It's not like they didn't know what to do in regards to planting bombs in the lower levels of the WTC, as they did it before.
[NOTE: I hate that any divergent thinking is automatically labeled a conspiracy theory. Granted, some are pretty dang far-fetched, but others leave one with serious questions and I don't think it does anyone any good to dismiss some of the research that's been done as pure BS just because it's not EXACTLY what the authorities think happened.]
LOL, I guess I haven't seen ALL the sites. Thanks for that link Dakota. I have to admit from my vantage point that day (TV) it looked an awful lot like a "controlled demolition" as far as the angle I saw -- but I was thinking the terrorists were just assuring maximum damage. But, I will readily admit I wasn't there and TV cameras can distort a lot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.