Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Carlson: Hillary Still Resents Lieberman Over Lewinsky
NewsMax ^ | 11 July 2006

Posted on 07/10/2006 5:14:07 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher

There could be an additional, unspoken reason behind Sen. Hillary Clinton’s recent declaration that she won’t support Sen. Joe Lieberman if he loses the Democratic primary in Connecticut – payback.

Lieberman, as Hillary well recalls, took her husband Bill to task over the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

As NewsMax reported last week, Clinton said she would support the nominee chosen by Connecticut Democrats in the August 8 primary, even though Lieberman has announced that he plans to run as an independent if he loses.

"I believe we must honor the decisions made by Democratic primary voters,” Hillary said.

But columnist Margaret Carlson, writing for Bloomberg.com, points out: "You can also interpret Clinton’s swipe at Lieberman as an act of lingering resentment against the man who scolded her husband during impeachment proceedings shortly after his admission in August 1998 that he had been lying to the country for seven months.

"Lieberman took to the Senate floor to slam Clinton ‘for having extramarital relations with an employee half his age . . . in the vicinity of the Oval Office. Such behavior is not just inappropriate. It is immoral.’”

Carlson then opines: "Revenge isn’t an admirable emotion but at least it’s evidence of some emotion from a woman who showed none during one of the most public cases of philandering ever . . . She may have been finally getting back at the Democrat who didn’t stand by her man.”

Carlson is a long time Clinton supporter and Time magazine contributor.

Lieberman is facing a strong primary challenge from millionaire businessman Ned Lamont, and many Connecticut Democrats are unhappy about the senator’s support for the Iraq war.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: 2006; 2008; bj; dopeydems; elections; hitlery; joelieberman; monica; mrsbj; slickwilly; witchofwashington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: Suzy Quzy; CremeSaver
Gal across the hallway was working for a Democrat from Arizona. She used to go off to the Shenandoah for the weekend and loan her apartment to various young(ish) Democrats.

I'd met Billzo earlier in the day when I was told "Hey, Bill's going to be President someday."

21 posted on 07/10/2006 5:40:33 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: skimask

Dude....


22 posted on 07/10/2006 5:41:15 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (What you know about that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: skimask

That is just revolting!


23 posted on 07/10/2006 5:41:39 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Its not Lieberman's fault Bubba was screwing around and got caught. Do not take any responsibility for your actions. That seems to be Hillary's stance.Boy, talk about sour grapes.
24 posted on 07/10/2006 5:42:46 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ
Meanwhile I saw my first Lieberman yard sign today. There are already dozens if not hundreds of Lamont signs around.Pretty sad what the Dems have been reduced to.

The democRAT Party long ago became a Party of common prostitutes.I'll bet that the people of Fairfield County,who have benefited to a breathtaking degree from this country's opportunities and the folks around New Haven who will someday reap those benefits are Lamont's biggest supporters.

BTW,FYI...I saw a Ford SUV on the Mass Turnpike a week or so ago that had CT plates that indicated that the owner was the Speaker of the CT House.It had a little "peace symbol" on the bumper.My guess is that that means that he/she is in Lamont's camp.

25 posted on 07/10/2006 5:43:46 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Carlson then opines: "Revenge isn’t an admirable emotion but at least it’s evidence of some emotion from a woman who showed none during one of the most public cases of philandering ever . . . She may have been finally getting back at the Democrat who didn’t stand by her man.”

Oh yes, this is exactly the type of person we want running for the White House - a person who is still upset with a fine, upstanding Senator who didn't help her cover up the immoral actions of her scumbag husband. Where I can vote for that!

26 posted on 07/10/2006 5:45:26 PM PDT by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
I agree; While I am sure Hillary would love Joe to lose, she will support the Dem candidate. In fact, I can't imagine any Dem, or Republican for that matter, supporting a third party candidate.
27 posted on 07/10/2006 5:48:47 PM PDT by martinidon (Bush won sKerry lost and Soro's is out millions for nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Just what I was thinking. If the press didn't hide this side of Shrillery some of the 'blind as a bat' dems might decided she wasn't the one they wanted.
28 posted on 07/10/2006 5:48:52 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Oh you poor thing. Is this an experience that gives you nightmares to this very day? It would be for me. LOL!


29 posted on 07/10/2006 5:50:18 PM PDT by CremeSaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

And you know they had a Threesome with another girl??? ICK.


30 posted on 07/10/2006 5:50:56 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Well Hillary should watch playing the revenge angle so overtly. There were plenty of people burned by Her Thingness and Bubba. What goes around come around.


31 posted on 07/10/2006 5:51:18 PM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: somemoreequalthanothers
As in Hillary gives Lieberman a Lewinsky!
32 posted on 07/10/2006 5:52:13 PM PDT by AmericanDave (Over it's NOT, till over it IS....... Yoda Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

C'mon! You have gotten all of interested. Please tell the whole story. Pleeeease.


33 posted on 07/10/2006 5:53:59 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Joe has not lost this primary yet. Perhaps we can make it Hillary's first primary. She is out on a limb here.

yitbos

34 posted on 07/10/2006 5:54:10 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CremeSaver
She crawled out of the other apartment and fell against my door. That's what got me to the door. Looking through the security peephole I noticed that the subject was, horror of horrors, totally nekkid~~~~!!!!

And she was puking under my door.

She never apologized. Never came over to clean it up in the morning.

35 posted on 07/10/2006 5:57:18 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

The other woman arrived earlier that day.


36 posted on 07/10/2006 5:57:44 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

Check my post at #35


37 posted on 07/10/2006 5:58:32 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Revenge? I don't think so.

I think Hillary's attitude toward Lieberman is more an excellent example of how the Democrat mind works. Hillary can't blame Clinton for messing around with Monica. After all, out of expediency, she long ago forgave Clinton any transgressions. She can't blame herself, so she's going to blame Lieberman, right along with Ken Starr and the right wing conspiracy.

I forget who wrote an article I read this morning, but he/she explained Lieberman can't offer anything to Hillary, he's worthless, so she can please the far left fringe of the party by withholding her full support, it's a freebie for her.

That Hillary and Al Gore too, will toss a Lieberman overboard so callously, really exposes what they are all about. But maybe we secretly admire them? Well, we get all twisted out of shape because George Bush won't toss the despicable Arlen Spector, don't we?


38 posted on 07/10/2006 6:00:20 PM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

HILLARY WAS NAKED AND PUKING AT YOUR DOOR???????


39 posted on 07/10/2006 6:02:12 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
This just gets better and better. I would say "wow, lucky guy," until I remembered who it was that was nekkid! Even a young Hillary would be a horror. LOL!
40 posted on 07/10/2006 6:02:18 PM PDT by CremeSaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson