Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 9 July 2006
Various big media television networks ^ | 9 July 2006 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 07/09/2006 5:06:16 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, July 9th, 2006

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Undersecretary of State R. Nicholas Burns; Wendy Sherman, counselor for the State Department in the Clinton administration; Rep. Peter Hoekstra, R-Mich.; former CIA Director James Woolsey.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Undersecretary of State R. Nicholas Burns; Robert Galluci, dean of Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service; New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Undersecretary of State R. Nicholas Burns and Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind.; Sen. George Allen, R-Va., and Democratic opponent James Webb; NBA star Alonzo Mourning.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.; Burns; Iraqi Ambassador Samir Al Sumaidaie; former Secretary of State Alexander Haig and former national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: facethenation; foxnewssunday; georgeallen; guests; jameswebb; lateedition; lineup; meetthepress; sunday; talkshows; thisweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 681-694 next last
To: Alas Babylon!

MTP

Tacky comment by me: Richardson sure is eating good as Governor of New Mexico.


61 posted on 07/09/2006 5:48:26 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

These guys on NBC are empty suits, trying hard to justify their failures during the Clinton regime.


62 posted on 07/09/2006 5:48:50 AM PDT by maica (Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle --Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Tim: Do you think NK would give up nukes for economic help?

Gallucci: I don't know, but it's a good idea to find out.
It was a good idea that we (Clinton administration) negotiated with them.

(By all means, lets give them more money for them to shovel into their nuke program. I have rocks in my yard smarter than this guy).


63 posted on 07/09/2006 5:49:01 AM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Peach

When Russert was interviewing Burns, was he all hunched over, frowning like Nixon, and clutching his little talking points paper? Was he asking his questions in a sharp, district attorney style manner?

Contrast this to the way he'll "question" the Clintonoids. He will smile, laugh, and gayly ponder softball questions with a review of how swell things were up to the year 2001.


64 posted on 07/09/2006 5:49:58 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Richardson : I never met lil Kim, I met the number two in command. He's a cult personality and knows everything that happens in that country. People in terrible shape; I've been there 5 times and the people are starving. He is a mercurial character but he's crazy like a fox. He's not out of his mind.

He cancels agreements, he gets nuke inspectors out in 2002. We should take advantage of his vulnerability. The people need food and electricity.

Tim: Thanks all for a sobering and important discussion.


65 posted on 07/09/2006 5:50:49 AM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: aligncare
I wonder why these press corps do some research before coming for questiong (they gave 24 hour notice) to get something the nation didn't know and like to hear from the President. It almost looked like WH presser with the oft-repeated questions - even our gentle had to point the NBC reorter that her's was a "LOADED" question.

Larry King's interview was respectful & interesting.

66 posted on 07/09/2006 5:50:55 AM PDT by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Peach
The NK's aren't going to start a war in response to that.

And he knows that how? They are just trying to show how "tough" they are, but this contradicts all of the criticism of the President...preemptive, unilateral, aggressive, no international consensus.

67 posted on 07/09/2006 5:51:31 AM PDT by Bahbah (Democrat Motto: Why not the worst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: maica; Peach
IMHO worthy of single post award


68 posted on 07/09/2006 5:52:16 AM PDT by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Good question and maybe someone else can answer it. I was listening and typing but not watching the screen. I didn't sense that Russert was terribly hostile to Burns, but I don't pick up a lot of that nuance when I'm typing.


69 posted on 07/09/2006 5:52:30 AM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: snugs

You're too kind. I'd have to go back but I think I was typing what one of the guests said, but at this point I'm not sure, snugs. LOL. I need my tea.


70 posted on 07/09/2006 5:53:23 AM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: maica

Good question, maica. Forget Larry. Even AP had put the deficit reduction surprise on their wires, which is not easy to ignore. That say it all.


71 posted on 07/09/2006 5:56:32 AM PDT by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
I did a double-take too.

He did say THAT, but then went on to prevaricate in a VERY John Kerry-manner ("I was against the War while voting for the War").

Once again, what was on display here was the schizoid philosophy of the Dems in their attempt to hold onto a 'Base' that is incredibly Far-Left and Michael Moore-ish while at the same time trying to appeal to middle-of-the-road voters that they need to gain power again.

The internal conflicts and inconsistencies of the Dems were on display this morning.

72 posted on 07/09/2006 5:56:44 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (A wall first. A wall now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
In addition, Rudi Bakhtiar is reportedly getting a higher-profile assignment in the 5pm hour. She may be used to attract more eyeballs to The Big Story; it was the lowest-rated weekday FNC program in the 25-54 demographic in the second quarter...

Julie Banderas isn't hot enough to do Big Story Weekend anymore?

73 posted on 07/09/2006 5:56:45 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Going partly violently to the thing 24-7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
...not really tacky. Look at President Bush. You achieve his level of fitness though hard work and determination. This relects on his work habits, mental alertness. Sloppy body, sloppy mind Mr. Richardson.
74 posted on 07/09/2006 5:57:06 AM PDT by aligncare (Watergate killed journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy; All
Tim doesn't even bother to give the appearance of fair and balanced.

Agreed.

Good morning to all, looks like another big Sunday thread.

There is lots going on this week, here are a few things I dug up here and there.

The one that got my attention the most was a piece I found at powerline. You will find it here:

http://powerline.com/archives/014621.php

It illustrates how Saddam was paying bonuses to those managers who performed well in his dictatorship. In fact so well that he paid 5,000 bonuses to many that had excelled. Here is a partial list of bonuses that were paid by the Hussein regime.

Chemical weapons dept.-- 12 employees paid 5,000 dinar bonuses

Nuclear weapons dept.--9 employees paid 5,000 dinars bonus

Missles--7 employees paid 5,000 dinar bonuses, and last but hardly least

the biological dept. where 9 employees were paid the 5,000 bonus.

Nice to see that Saddam was an equal opportunity employer compensating his men whenever and whenever necessary.

Oh you did not know about those depts. don't look for this to run in the MSM/driveby paper in your area any time soon. use the same link numbers only 4620 for more on WMD as well....... Also Diana Irey is on the move, she has gotten some former vets to side with her demanding an apology from Murtah for all his nasty comments about our troops, it's good stuff and you will find it at

: http:..www.chronwatch.com/content/content/display.asp?aid=21483

75 posted on 07/09/2006 5:57:54 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Support new Media, ticket drive-bys--America--Land of the Free because of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Peach

100% true, Peach.


76 posted on 07/09/2006 5:58:10 AM PDT by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Exactly correct the Clintonistas answer and solution to NK didn't work in 1998 and won't work now.


"International Reactions

* United States:
On 10 September 1998, the United States announced a package of agreements aimed at defusing tensions and resuming the stalled Four Party Talks on the Korean Peninsula.[5] US President Bill Clinton used his executive authority to circumvent congressional opposition to the 1994 Agreed Framework by shifting $15 million to fund the purchase of 150,000 tons of heavy-fuel oil for North Korea.[6] On 1 October 1998, US officials led by Assistant Secretary of State Robert Einhorn, re-opened missile talks with North Korean representatives in New York. However, the talks yielded no substantial progress.[7] State Department spokesman James Rubin said that if North Korea continued missile production, deployment and flight tests as well as the export of missile technology, it would be highly destabilizing and would have very serious negative consequences.[8] "


77 posted on 07/09/2006 5:58:43 AM PDT by stopem (God Bless the U.S.A the Troops who protect her, and their Commander In Chief !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: snugs

Ditto.


78 posted on 07/09/2006 5:58:52 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: anita
...how robust it is, in his mind.

What a fat, greasy slug.

You can't get this quality of spin from the best of the Dem-bullsh*tters... every Sunday Russert proves his worth to the socialist party.

79 posted on 07/09/2006 5:59:41 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Which future candidate does this help? Do we need 3 guesses?

Three guesses:

Hillary.

Rodham.

And Clinton.

80 posted on 07/09/2006 6:00:12 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 681-694 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson