Posted on 07/08/2006 4:01:26 AM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
There's something rotten in Mexico. And it smells like Florida. The ruling party, the Washington-friendly National Action Party, proclaimed yesterday their victory in the presidential race, albeit tortilla thin, was Mexico's first "clean" election. But that requires we close our eyes to some very dodgy doings in the vote count that are far too reminiscent of the games played in Florida in 2000. And indeed, evidence suggests that Team Bush had a hand in what may be another presidential election heist.
Just before the 2000 balloting in Florida, I reported in the Guardian that its governor, Jeb Bush, had ordered the removal of tens of thousands of black citizens from the state's voter rolls. He called them "felons", but our investigation discovered their only crime was Voting While Black. And that little scrub of the voter rolls gave the White House to his brother George.
Jeb's winning scrub list was the creation of a private firm, ChoicePoint of Alpharetta, Georgia. Now, it seems, ChoicePoint is back in the voter list business - in Mexico - at the direction of the Bush government. Months ago, I got my hands on a copy of a memo from the US Federal Bureau of Investigation, marked "secret", regarding a contract for "intelligence collection of foreign counter-terrorism investigations".
Given that the memo was dated September 17 2001, a week after the attack on the World Trade Centre, hunting for terrorists seemed like a heck of a good idea. But oddly, while all 19 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf, the contract was for obtaining the voter files of Venezuela, Brazil ... and Mexico.
What those Latin American countries have in common, besides a lack of terrorists, is either a left-leaning president or a left candidate for president ahead in the opinion polls,
(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...
Can't even get published in the NYT? How about the Cornell University student paper? This Palast is a self-evident nutcase. Bet he believes the 'French' version of 9/11 as well.
Yeah, we both think Latina women are hot, and we like mexican food. Anything beyond that is subjective to the individual, though.
Palast= fake but accurate
Look South - Americans could learn from Mexican elections. --Despite this ruckus, Mexicans have something to teach Americans about how to run an election. Many types of vote fraud that have been alleged in American elections simply could not occur in Mexico. After Mexico’s 1988 election, when the Institutional Revolutionary party (PRI) was accused of staging a computer crash that gave them the votes needed to stay in power, major reforms were implemented. To begin, Mexico spends much more than the U.S. on measures to prevent vote fraud. All voters in Mexico must present voter IDs at the polls, which include not only a photo but also a thumbprint. Opponents of a photo-voter-ID system in the United States argue that any such system would keep voters from the polls — and would impact mostly lower-income voters. Yet in Mexico, where about 40 percent of the population is below the poverty line, strict voter-ID rules have actually increased voter turnout .
From USA Today:
"Mexican authorities have launched an official probe into the data sales to ChoicePoint, as have those in Colombia, Guatemala, Nicaragua and Costa Rica. In Mexico, federal investigators issued an arrest warrant for a fugitive believed to have sold the federal election records to a Mexican data firm, which resold the database to ChoicePoint.
In May, Mexican investigators asked ChoicePoint to send representatives to Mexico City, but the company refused, fearing that its employees would be arrested, Jordan said. Instead, ChoicePoint persuaded Mexican officials to come to the Mexican consulate in Atlanta, where the company handed over the electoral data. "
http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?p=ChoicePoint+arrest+mexico+mexican&sp=1&ei=UTF-8&fr=FP-pull-web-t&SpellState=n-1193546154_q-ZR5e.UPT8Nxr4rwOhhwblwABAA%40%40&u=www.usatoday.com/tech/news/techpolicy/2003-09-01-choicepoint_x.htm&w=choicepoint+arrest+mexico+mexican&d=MsHGiTmtNCl8&icp=1&.intl=us
Since our own national security continues to be ignored, I find it very difficult to believe that those who have so much invested into the open borders/free trade agenda, would jeopardize that investment by allowing the election of a Mexican president who does not.
And the absentee Miiltary vote was never counted in Fla. right? (In 2000) Bush won by a lot more than 537 votes.
There is good reason to believe he won by a lot more, since he easily carried FL in '04, despite losing ground in solid conservative states like NH and OH. I think if everyone knew everything about voting fraud in this country, we would all issue a collective shudder that would circle the globe several times.
The left just can't get it right (ah, so to speak.) We have Ann: she's attractive, funny as can be, and pretty reliable on facts, truth, stuff like that. They have .... Michael Moore? Gag me! And THIS guy? Does the Guardian do fact checking, or is that considered something only the barbaric Americans -- those not associated with CBS or the NYT - do?
There is an emanation seeping from the Guardian that smells like Greg Palast bilgewater. Of course, it's hard to pick it out of all thge other ripe smells that emanate from that bastion of sewage and bilge, but then again, maybe there is a common factor at work here.
Ah, yes, there it is - socialism, the refuge of scoundrels and liars.
So you would put your faith in a man of the left? I remember the faith that was put in Castro in 1959. At best Mexico would get a government like that of Spain and maybe one that gets Cuban cigars.
In our voting place, ballot boxes had 4 clear plastic windows, those of us standing in line saw pictures taken to verify the ballot boxes were empty. FOUR observers minimum from four parties walked back and forth to observe. To vote, I had to have the card that was given months before, and it had to match the photo, names and address for people allowed to vote in that district. My finger was inked with silver nitrate, and at the end of the day, together votes were tallied and posted,,,for all to see. I didn't see any voter fraud.
What’s the other side that dismantles this crap? I was involved in multiple 2000 protest to stop the recounts, but don’t remember this charge.
I greatly appreciate you report.
I'd welcome this country adoptiing the same measures. Vote fraud cheats everyone, regardless of party.
Best of the Web Today - July 5, 2006
By MARY ANASTASIA O'GRADY
James Taranto is on vacation. Best of the Web Today will return July 17. Until then we hope you enjoy some of our other offerings from OpinionJournal.
MEXICO CITY--Felipe Calderón of the National Action Party hasn't any doubt that he won Sunday's presidential election, and he says that his adversary, Andres Manuel López Obrador of the Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD), knows it, too. In an interview with The Wall Street Journal at his campaign headquarters yesterday, Mr. Calderón appeared rested and confident. "I'm not going to get into personalities," he told me, "but all the parties have copies of the tally sheets showing the voting, and the PRD knows that it lost."
Mr. Calderón's numbers jibe with those of Mexico's Federal Electoral Institute (IFE) and it seems almost certain that he won. But as we go to press, an official announcement has not yet been made. A preliminary ruling is scheduled for today, with the official decision to come on Friday. And even then the country may be in for weeks of the Mexican equivalent of challenges to hanging chads.
The big victory in this race goes to the IFE in carrying out a spectacularly clean, transparent and well-organized election. If institutions matter to development, as Nobel laureate Douglass North contends, then Mexico is well on the way to progress. Mr. Calderón echoed the sentiments of millions of Mexicans when he told me yesterday that watching the electoral process made him "proud to be a Mexican." Mexico's next test will be how it stands up to Mr. López Obrador's threat to call street protests if the IFE decision goes against him.
For the past four months this nation has been bracing for a nail-biter of a race. The chief concern was that Mr. López Obrador, a renowned sore loser, would respond in a manner detrimental to Mexican democracy if he were edged out by the competition.
The race was every bit as tight as pollsters had predicted. And by Monday morning when it began to appear that Mr. López Obrador had secured only second place, Mexicans were treated, on national television, to a flash of anger that revealed the trademark intolerance that has made him such a polarizing figure: The red- faced candidate gripped the podium in frustration, pledging to exhaust every available legal channel. His head shook uncontrollably as he demanded that the country "respect" his "triumph." Yesterday, his senior aides told Reuters that his supporters would take to the streets if the election authorities don't go his way.
The problem for Mr. López Obrador is that in order to prevail, he has to do more than convince Mexicans that Mr. Calderón is a thieving opponent who managed a massive conspiracy against the will of the people. He also has to portray the IFE and the thousands of citizen volunteers--who on Sunday put on a clinic for the rest of the world on how to run a transparent and orderly election--as enemies of the Mexican people. That won't be easy, and public opinion is fast turning against him.
The Sunday vote was an amazing electoral symphony, featuring thousands of small polling stations all over this sprawling metropolis, in private homes, schools and community centers. I passed by or visited a mere fraction of them. Yet my impressions were confirmed by wider press reports and independent observers. Everywhere I went, from well-to-do districts in the north and south to the popular neighborhoods downtown, the scene was one of saintly patience and First World order. A summer downpour didn't faze voters one bit. They covered their heads with newspapers, shared umbrellas--and waited.
The rest of the city was calm as well. In the main downtown city square, the Zócalo, which was ground zero for the López Obrador campaign, life was normal. A couple of hammer-and-sickle flags fluttered in the breeze near a tent that read "Zapata Vive"--Zapata Lives--and rickshaw drivers pedaled their passengers through the narrow streets of colonial Mexico.
This city was voting to fill six seats, including that of the president and the mayor. Voters presented identification cards and were handed six large ballots, one for each open office. The names of candidates were also color-coded to assist the illiterate. Voting booths were small, waist-high writing tables enclosed by hanging plastic sheets printed with the reassuring words, "The vote is free and secret." Voters emerged from the booths, folded the ballots and slid each one into the box corresponding to the contested seat. To complete the process, thumbs were marked with indelible ink and ID cards were returned. Observers from each party monitored the flow.
As a former resident of this city, renowned for its "ungovernability," I was profoundly impressed by the precision of this exercise; and official observers echoed my anecdotal observations on Sunday night. Mexico pulled off a near "10" in electoral order.
As polls closed around the country on Sunday evening, poll workers from each party signed off on tally sheets and sent the totals to the IFE. There was a marked absence of complaints from any polling station about irregularities, but there was a surprise. There had been wide expectations that Mr. López Obrador would have the early lead, since this city--which is his stronghold--was expected to report first. Instead, the northern state of Coahuila seems to have reported ahead of the national capital, and so, from the earliest tallies, Mr. Calderón had the lead. It was a lead he would never lose.
The IFE had worked hard to make all this happen and it wasn't about to commit a misstep. IFE president Luis Carlos Ugalde announced at 11 p.m. that Mexicans would have to wait until Wednesday morning for a winner. Still, the transparency of the process was working against Mr. López Obrador, and as polling stations reported--and tallies were posted on the Web--it became clear that Mr. Calderón had won by a whisker. On Sunday evening, the head of the European Union observer team attested to the fairness and transparency of the election.
Mr. López Obrador smelled defeat and swung into action with Plan B. Just after Mr. Ugalde asked the candidates not to declare victory, the PRD candidate jumped in front of the cameras and told all of Mexico that he had won, adding that he had "information" from the "quick count" showing that he was up by 500,000 votes.
It is doubtful that he had any such information. Rather it looked like classic López Obrador, working to arouse suspicion among his supporters that the establishment had carried out "a plot" against them. Arturo Sarukhan, campaign adviser for the PAN (Mr. Calderón's party), told me that his side had no choice but to respond: "We were standing in the 'war room' at campaign headquarters, discussing how to calibrate Felipe Calderón's message in light of the request that Mr. Ugalde had made when we heard him [Mr. López Obrador] claiming a lead of 500,000 votes. That's when we decided we had to report the independent exit polls." Mr. Calderón appeared shortly thereafter on television, rattling off a string of independent exit polls that showed him in the lead.
Mr. López Obrador now claims that there are three million "lost" votes, and that he senses all kinds of "irregularities," none of which are backed up with evidence. While all the votes are not yet in the official tallies because of a technicality in reporting, the Calderón team remains confident that they are accounted for in the totals that all parties now have, and that the outcome will not change.
Mr. Calderón, for his part, is reaching out to his political competition and looking presidential and civil. In a clear reference to the López Obrador campaign, he told me on Tuesday that Mexicans sent a message at the polls that they want a tolerant, pluralistic society, not one of "hatred." This "is the hour of reconciliation and unity." He is already talking about a coalition government that will reach across the aisle to get things done, and has noted that the way in which Colombian President Alvaro Uribe has worked across parties lines has been instructive to him.
In the past 48 hours, Mexico has watched two distinct management styles unfold. Indeed, it is not unreasonable to conclude that the very reason that Mr. Calderón seems set to take the office of president is precisely because Mexicans feared the López Obrador they are now witnessing.
Ms. O'Grady, a member of The Wall Street Journal's editorial board, is editor of the weekly Americas column.
URL for this article: http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110008608
Where's the BARF ALERT ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
