Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Deploys Nuclear Submarines...Capable of Nuclear Counterstrike(Thank you Clinton)
JoongAng Ilbo ^ | 07/07/06

Posted on 07/08/2006 12:19:52 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

/begin my translation

China Deploys Nuclear Submarines...Capable of Nuclear Counterstrike

Hong Kong's Xin-bao reported on July 7th that China has deployed next-generation nuclear submarines and is capable of second nuclear counterstrike.

German military publication 'International Navy' reported that China officially deployed recently-developed Type 093 and 094 nuclear submarines, and conducted training exercises. They are in combat-deployment now, according to the publication.

It said that Type 094, Tang-class, is the improved version of Xia-class nuclear submarine, with 10,000-ton displacement, and can carry 16 Julang-2 SLBM's which have the range of 10,000 km. Each Julang-2 can have three nuclear-warheads, which means that a single Type 094 submarine can strike 48 targets simultaneously.

Type 094 has fourth-generation nuclear reactor and is equipped with noise-suppression feature and precision sonar capability. It has superior stealth, mobility, and survivability, which is rated as comparable to Ohio-class submarine of U.S.

Type 093 is an attack submarine with 7,150 ton displacement , whose design is based on Han-class submarine.

If their deployment is successful, Chinese nuclear capability will expand from land-based nukes to second nuclear counterstrike, according to this publication.

People's Daily, Chinese official communist party paper, featured an article on its Internet site about the submarines on July 6th, which is a de-facto confirmation of their deployment.

/end my translation


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boomer; china; chinesemilitary; clinton; clintonlegacy; geopolitics; julang2; missiles; nuclearsubmarine; secondstrike; type093; type094
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster

Good thing we're getting rid of the S-3s.

Who needs ASW anyway?


21 posted on 07/08/2006 5:19:47 AM PDT by opbuzz (Right way, wrong way, Marine way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinoguy
Thanks for the perspective. Are you Chinese, using a translator program?

It is easy to focus on the "tip of the iceberg", but most of it is in the water, ready to rip apart the hull! I see your image perfectly, and add to it, the will of the Chinese to increase their stance in the world. they do not like playing catch-up, but have done a good job of stealing from everyone else to accomplish their task.

Clinton was not the first, but probably the worst... faciltator in their game!

Chinese were Clinton's buddies, Mexicans are there for GWB! Americans? We just pay the bills for their pandering and bend over!


22 posted on 07/08/2006 5:21:56 AM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
It has superior stealth, mobility, and survivability, which is rated as comparable to Ohio-class submarine of U.S.

Rated by who?

23 posted on 07/08/2006 5:24:05 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rane _H
Leads me to believe the above isn't much of a complement. Or am I dead wrong?

The Ohio class are considered to be the quietest ballistic missile submarines ever built. To say that the Chinese SSBN is as quiet is a definite complement, and something I have trouble believing.

24 posted on 07/08/2006 5:26:56 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Strategerist
I believe you are forgetting, perhaps conveniently, the fact that the Clinton Administration allowed there largest political contributor, LORAL SPACE and it's owner Bernie Sanders to sell China technology that allowed them to increase the throw weight, range and accuracy of their missiles. This sale was made against the advice of the CIA, FBI, State Dept and Pentagon, none of whom would sign off on the deal. Clinton then had the authority for this sale transfered to the Commerce Dept and the sale was made.

When it all came out LORAL SPACE was fined $14,000,000, a relative pittance, and China received technology that by all accounts advanced their missile program anywhere from 15-25 years.
26 posted on 07/08/2006 6:14:05 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon
Image hosted by Photobucket.com the Ring-Laser-Gyro???
27 posted on 07/08/2006 6:22:26 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; All
Remember to shop at Walmart everyone!

Just one of the fringe benefits of not buying American.
28 posted on 07/08/2006 6:24:30 AM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: All

Whose paying for Chinese nukes?
Answer: American/EU consumer purchasing cheap asian imports.

So we can blame ourselves, and don't feed the dog if you know one day he's going bite you in the ass.

Otherwise it's all self directed hate, until we as a nation quit playing the blame game, excuse making, crapola and get real working solutions.


34 posted on 07/08/2006 6:52:41 AM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
I was about the make similar points.

Thanks :)
35 posted on 07/08/2006 7:39:14 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - Foreman of the NAU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Excellent come back. I agree with you. If there hadn't been 8 years of Clinton, Bush wouldn't be blamed for anything.


36 posted on 07/08/2006 8:11:32 AM PDT by conservative blonde (Conservative Blonde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

China and Russia are up to no good, imo


37 posted on 07/08/2006 8:14:53 AM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePb6H-j51xE&search=Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death

You have stumbled onto a bash Clinton thread. The Wal-Mart bash thread is on aisle 19, across from Bush's Open Borders. Have a nice day.


38 posted on 07/08/2006 8:17:50 AM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon

If China has Boomers, they've just given a new Mission and lease-on-life for our 688 Class Attack Boats.

We'll know all of their strengths, weakneses, quirks of the Driver and where to put a Homing Torpedo within a month!

Jack.


39 posted on 07/08/2006 8:24:55 AM PDT by Jack Deth (Knight Errant and Disemboweler of the WFTD Thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

40 posted on 07/08/2006 8:33:07 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson