Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea: Taepodong-2 pointed at waters near Hawaii: report (direct provocation)
Kyodo News ^ | 07/07/06

Posted on 07/06/2006 5:06:10 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Taepodong-2 pointed at waters near Hawaii: report

(Kyodo) _ The Taepodong-2 long-range missile recently test-fired by North Korea was pointed at waters near Hawaii, the Sankei Shimbun reported Friday in its online edition.

Citing government sources in Japan and the United States, the report said Japan's Defense Agency and the U.S. military reached the conclusion after analyzing the missile's path from data collected by Aegis-equipped destroyers and RC-135S electronic reconnaissance aircraft.

The missile was test-fired from its launching site in Musudanri in northeast North Korea early Wednesday local time before landing into the Sea of Japan about several hundred kilometers away.

The authorities decided that the missile was pointed at Hawaii from the angle of its nose cone immediately after the launch and the altitude it has reached, the report said.

The distance between North Korea and Hawaii is about 7,000 kikometers. While Taepodong-2 was widely believed to have the firing range of 3,500-6,000 km, its actual range can be longer, the report said.

It is not clear why North Korea targeted areas near Hawaii, but the sources believe North either wanted to show that the missile's firing range includes the United States, or because Hawaii is home to the headquarters of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, or because the missile could mistakenly hit a land area if fired toward Alaska, the report said.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: actofwar; axisofevil; bashbush; hawaii; korea; missile; nkorea; northkorea; proliferation; taepodong; taepodong2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 381 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster

"the missile was pointed at Hawaii"

hell ! we ought to shoot one back ! Splash it right
down off their coast .
If they ever manage to get one this far , that we don't shoot down first , we ought to shove one right up their shute .

*#@k those people


281 posted on 07/07/2006 12:03:44 AM PDT by LeoWindhorse (strive on with heedfulness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Has it been reported why it failed 40 seconds in air?

It was the result of modifications to Karl Rove's evil weather machine.

282 posted on 07/07/2006 12:05:13 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Scientists Are Itching to Blame Poison Ivy's Effect on Global Warming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edpc
Do-It-Yourself Shelter

Duct tape (optional)

283 posted on 07/07/2006 12:06:50 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Scientists Are Itching to Blame Poison Ivy's Effect on Global Warming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

284 posted on 07/07/2006 12:09:26 AM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress
Personally, I think China Is enjoying the reaction watch!

And they are getting all this on the cheap. Starving Koreans in the process. This situation is why the term 'First Strike' was developed. Do we let them starve or try to save some ?

285 posted on 07/07/2006 12:12:08 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mark Koch
Riemann or Lesbegue? OR does it even make it difference?

It does, but Almost Nowhere.

286 posted on 07/07/2006 12:12:46 AM PDT by FredZarguna (There are no jobs Americans won't do; there are only American employers who won't pay market wages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Mark Koch
Riemann or Lesbegue? OR does it even make it difference?

It does, but Almost Nowhere.

287 posted on 07/07/2006 12:12:48 AM PDT by FredZarguna (There are no jobs Americans won't do; there are only American employers who won't pay market wages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: yooling
"I read that it failed because some part(s) fell off shortly after launch.

Curious. Sort of like an car losing its transmission just after rolling off the assembly line. I guess just as far-fetched is the idea that the U.S. was testing its ship board lazer antimissile weapon on Taepondong-2. Naw! I must be dreaming. It couldn't happen.

288 posted on 07/07/2006 12:19:12 AM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Pox
A couple of days ago, a FOX reporter (I CANNOT remember which one) speculated that it was because the U.S. had restricted the international banking rights of the bank in Macao (sp?) that N. Korea was using to disperse the counterfeit U.S. $100 bills they are famous for. The N. Koreans were so pissed they left the Six Party talks on their nuclear weapons. Get this, talk about cahones, THEY (the Koreans) DEMANDED THAT WE RETURN THE SEIZED COUNTERFEIT BILLS TO THEM!! We obviously didn't, and the reporter was thinking maybe this "bank bust" was the real reason Kim Jung Mentally IL was so determined to fire his missiles.

I know it's serious, but I couldn't help laughing!! If anyone needed proof of this guy's mental health status......
289 posted on 07/07/2006 1:45:13 AM PDT by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All
==just an airburst near the Southeast Rift Zone of Kilauea might send the Hilina Pali area sliding into the sea=

Anybody knowledgeable about the effects of an airburt for the purpose of an ECM attack? Would a detonation over the Pacific involve only Hawaii, or beyond to CONUS?

290 posted on 07/07/2006 1:54:52 AM PDT by OnRightOnLeftCoast (U.S. government: Voluntary domestic laws and policies assuring self-destruction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop

"The more I think about this I come to one conclusion,NK is very close to economic"

The six-party talks are making it very difficult for NK to blackmail the United States, and it is frustrating them.

This is one area where stratergery has paid off.


291 posted on 07/07/2006 3:04:45 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
.....the new owners of the shelter and house above it are gays. What then?

You can beat them, or join them.....literally.

;-)

292 posted on 07/07/2006 4:21:41 AM PDT by edpc (Violence is ALWAYS a solution. Maybe not the right one....but a solution nonetheless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

And the nuclear clock creeps a few minutes closer to midnight.


293 posted on 07/07/2006 4:51:29 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: singfreedom

I had forgotten about that. It certainly is a good reason for them to be acting up like this lately. It was another major source of income for that nutbar.


294 posted on 07/07/2006 5:17:10 AM PDT by Pox (If it's a Coward you are searching for, you need look no further than the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Has it been reported why it failed 40 seconds in air?


On another thread someone suggested is was a Max-Q Issue. The shuttle hits Max-Q at something like 38 seconds. From answers.com Max Q is an aeronautical engineering term for Maximum Quotient, the maximum aerodynamic stress on a spacecraft in atmospheric flight. During a normal space shuttle launch, this occurs at an altitude around 35,000 feet [1]. This maximum stress occurs due to spacecraft acceleration through the atmosphere. After launch, a space vehicle accelerates quickly, causing the pressure exerted by the air on the vehicle to increase. Atmospheric pressure, however, decreases rapidly with increasing altitude. The force exerted by the air increases due to acceleration up until Max Q, after which point the exerted pressure begins to fall due to decreasing air density. The chain of events leading to the Challenger disaster occurred shortly after the spacecraft passed Max Q.
295 posted on 07/07/2006 5:56:14 AM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

"Has it been reported why it failed 40 seconds in air?"

I got this one: the rockets quit firing.


296 posted on 07/07/2006 5:58:22 AM PDT by righttackle44 (The most dangerous weapon in the world is a Marine with his rifle and the American people behind him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #297 Removed by Moderator

To: All

Tokyo Daily: DPRK's Taepo Dong-2 Said Uses PRC Missile Tracking System: Source
Report by Takashi Arimoto: "Missile Tacking System Procured from China?"
Sankei Shimbun (Internet version-WWW)
Thursday,July 6, 2006

Washington -- It was learned that missile tracking systems procured from China might have been used in the long-range ballistic missile Taepo Dong-2 and the other missiles fired in the early hours of 5 July. This was revealed by a military source well-versed in Korean peninsula affairs on 4 July.

According to this source, North Korea procured tracking systems consisting of high-speed monitoring camera and radar from China.

The details of when and how the procurement was made are unclear. This tracking system serves to monitor the flight position of missiles accurately and is indispensable for developing missile technology.

Since North Korea does not have artificial satellites, it uses navigational devices, such as gyroscope, to measure flight angle and angular velocity to monitor missile position accurately.

The US aeronautics magazine points out in its issue that went on sale on 26 June that China "provided a wide range of rocket technology" to North Korea in its development of Taepo Dong missiles.

In this connection, the same source said that Iran, together with China, is also involved with (the DPRK's) missile development. He added: "An investigation into the tracking system used in the missile tests will be a basis for determining whether Iran (as published) made the procurement directly from China."

(Description of Source: Tokyo Sankei Shimbun (Internet version-WWW) -- Internet version of daily published by Fuji Sankei Communications Group)





For more translations and news on terrorism, visit http://www.lauramansfield.com


298 posted on 07/07/2006 7:06:47 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
The Aegis cruiser based Ballistic Missile Defense {BMD} could have intercepted it on the dong-2's ascent.

The United States successfully carried out the eighth intercept test of its sea-based missile defense system on June 22, with a Aegis-equipped Maritime Self-Defense Force destroyer taking part for the first time, the U.S. Missile Defense Agency said. The "hit-to-kill" test involved a Standard Missile-3 interceptor missile fired by the U.S. Navy's Aegis cruiser USS Shiloh off Hawaii to shoot down a warhead separated from an incoming ballistic missile outside Earth's atmosphere. The SM-3 successfully intercepted a ballistic missile target with a separating re-entry vehicle outside the Earth's atmosphere. The test was sponsored by the U.S. Missile Defense Agency-sponsored test and was listed as Flight Test Maritime-10. It marked the seventh time the Aegis BMD Weapon System has successfully guided an SM-3 to a ballistic missile target intercept and the second time that the system intercepted a ballistic missile with a separating re-entry vehicle.

U.S. Navy ships equipped with earlier versions of Aegis BMD capability have been on operational duty since September 2004.

http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20060627-094034-5786r

299 posted on 07/07/2006 7:24:48 AM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (The Right To Take Life is NOT a Constitutional "Liberty" protected by the 14th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo; jonrick46; righttackle44; yooling; RedStateRocker; fanfan; NavyCanDo; Hilltop
The Aegis cruiser based Ballistic Missile Defense {BMD} could have intercepted it on the dong-2's ascent.

The United States successfully carried out the eighth intercept test of its sea-based missile defense system on June 22, with a Aegis-equipped Maritime Self-Defense Force destroyer taking part for the first time, the U.S. Missile Defense Agency said. The "hit-to-kill" test involved a Standard Missile-3 interceptor missile fired by the U.S. Navy's Aegis cruiser USS Shiloh off Hawaii to shoot down a warhead separated from an incoming ballistic missile outside Earth's atmosphere. The SM-3 successfully intercepted a ballistic missile target with a separating re-entry vehicle outside the Earth's atmosphere. The test was sponsored by the U.S. Missile Defense Agency-sponsored test and was listed as Flight Test Maritime-10. It marked the seventh time the Aegis BMD Weapon System has successfully guided an SM-3 to a ballistic missile target intercept and the second time that the system intercepted a ballistic missile with a separating re-entry vehicle.

U.S. Navy ships equipped with earlier versions of Aegis BMD capability have been on operational duty since September 2004.

http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20060627-094034-5786r

300 posted on 07/07/2006 7:29:36 AM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (The Right To Take Life is NOT a Constitutional "Liberty" protected by the 14th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 381 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson