Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China says it has little leverage on North (Korea)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 7/6/06 | Charles Hutzler - ap

Posted on 07/06/2006 11:19:53 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

BEIJING - When North Korea fired a volley of missiles this week, it not only defied warnings from longtime enemies the United States and Japan, it also spurned the pleas of its chief benefactor — China.

For a country that is North Korea's stalwart diplomatic protector and economic lifeline, providing the North with trade, lots of aid and all of its oil, China seemingly has little pull with its neighbor and ally of 55 years.

"China sends oil, grain and other assistance to North Korea. But aid isn't a weapon if it's not used as a weapon," said Zhang Liangui, a North Korea watcher at China's Central Party School, a training academy for the communist elite. "And China doesn't contemplate using aid as a weapon, so its influence is very poor."

As U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill returns to the region Friday and another furious round of regional diplomacy unfolds, pressure is building on China to keep North Korea from destabilizing a region vital to the interests of the United States and its allies.

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack on Wednesday urged China "to use that leverage, to apply it and encourage a change of behavior in the North Korean regime."

Beijing, however, is resisting, saying that while it condemns the missile tests, it prefers to cajole rather than threaten or punish Pyongyang. In the U.N. Security Council, China has called for more diplomacy and so far refused to endorse a threat of sanctions backed by Japan, Britain and the United States.

Behind Beijing's reluctance is a hard-nosed calculation of Chinese interests. Though relations between the Korean War allies have been strained for decades, China feels less threatened by North Korea's behavior than Tokyo and Washington do.

Beijing prefers a weak and unpredictable North Korea to the likely alternatives: an implosion that would send North Koreans streaming into China or a unified Korea under a South Korea allied to the U.S.

Still, Pyongyang's actions put Beijing in a bind between those interests and a pressing need to allay concerns in the U.S. and elsewhere about how an economically strong and rising China will use its new power.

"This is an important test of Chinese diplomacy and whether Beijing is ready to play a responsible role even when its comrade in arms makes bad choices," said Bonnie Glaser, a China specialist at the Center for International and Strategic Studies in Washington.

After the terror attacks on New York and Washington in 2001, China rallied to the U.S. side, deciding that playing a low-key role would allow it to focus on its primary goal: economic development. But as its economic might increased, China embraced governments in Africa, the Middle East and Latin America at odds with Washington, raising concerns about Chinese intentions.

A failure by China to restrain North Korea and get Pyongyang to resume negotiations over its nuclear program could solidify suspicions in the Bush administration.

"It's a headache for China's leaders," said Jin Canrong, an international affairs expert at Renmin University in Beijing. "Usually, like on the Iran issue, China can hide behind Russia. But this time on North Korea, there's no escape."

In recent days when North Korea placed a long-range Taepodong-2 rocket on a launching platform, China pleaded with Pyongyang to back down. Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao publicly urged North Korea to desist. Vice Foreign Minister Wu Dawei summoned North Korea's ambassador to Beijing last Friday.

In the wake of the missile launchings, China said Thursday that Wu will be heading to Pyongyang with a high-level delegation to celebrate the 45th anniversary of a friendship treaty between the countries.

Before he goes, Wu sits down with his U.S. counterpart, Hill, on Friday to discuss options for getting North Korea to cease missile tests and resume the nuclear negotiations.

But with China having removed its trade, aid and other economic ties as leverage, Beijing has few options other than diplomacy for dealing with Pyongyang, Chinese analysts said.

"China's unhappy, but what can it do? Fight?" said Cui Yingjiu, a retired professor at Peking University and a former classmate of North Korean leader Kim Jong Il's in the 1960s. "If South Korea and China join Japan and the United States, North Korea would collapse. What good would that be for China? No good at all."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Japan; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: china; korea; leverage; northkorea; proliferation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 07/06/2006 11:19:58 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

China's patience will wear thin........


2 posted on 07/06/2006 11:23:38 AM PDT by Red Badger (Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I would like to think that is true, but I suspect that they are playing good cop/bad cop. On the other hand, if they are playing good cop/bad cop, then they are making a collosal strategic mistake.


3 posted on 07/06/2006 11:23:38 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

It doesn't take a Chinese rocket scientist to figure out that those missiles can go north as well as east.........


4 posted on 07/06/2006 11:24:48 AM PDT by Red Badger (Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

How so?


5 posted on 07/06/2006 11:25:11 AM PDT by widowithfoursons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
99% of the food consumed in NK is from China,South Korea or Japan.

99% of the food consumed in NK is consumed by the Army, the police and friends of Dim Il Sung.

6 posted on 07/06/2006 11:26:23 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
How many times do we here -- from people right here at FR as well -- that we need China to take care of N. Korea for us.

We appease the communists endlessly with this carrot dangled in front of us.

It ain't going to happen and since when do we think despotic communist regimes will do our work for us?

7 posted on 07/06/2006 11:26:36 AM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
China says it has little leverage on North

Truth in advertising alert: China says it has little interest in leverage on North.

China wants us to be as preoccupied with NK and Iran as possible so they can do their own thing.

8 posted on 07/06/2006 11:27:29 AM PDT by Tamar1973 (Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
China seemingly has little pull with its neighbor and ally of 55 years. M

China can't control a half starved, non-nuclear, 5th world, rundown dump like North Korea? Yeah right!

9 posted on 07/06/2006 11:28:29 AM PDT by Bommer (Attention illegals: Why don't you do the jobs we can't do? Like fix your own countries problems!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Wise up. NKorea is doing exactly what China is telling them to do.

China's patience will wear thin........

10 posted on 07/06/2006 11:28:37 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant; NormsRevenge
I suspect that they are playing good cop/bad cop

Or bad cop / raving psychotic cop.

There is little point in negotiating with Pyonyang. Why after all would you waste time talking to a sock puppet?

But if China insists it has no influence, then maybe they won't mind if we take out the next missile on the launch pad, along with the entire facility. If they try for a long range launch, if they sail one over Japan, that should be the immediate response.

11 posted on 07/06/2006 11:28:48 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
China's patience will wear thin........

Wrong,wrong,*wrong*! China is motivated by money and a desire to weaken..diplomatically and militarily...the Paper Tiger (us).

Everything they do in this matter is predicated on those two facts.They know that *they* have nothing to fear from NK.

12 posted on 07/06/2006 11:31:22 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
This is yet another example of a MSM article in which the facts in the article itself show that the title is a total and deliberate lie. In this instance, it is an AP article, which does great harm because small newspapers and radio stations will refer to this twaddle without either thought or editorial review.

As the article makes clear, North Korea continues to function at all as a nation / government only because train loads of aid come in daily from China. China has life-or-death influence over the murderous dictatorship of Kim Jong-Il. To say otherwise is absolute and obvious dishonesty.

I spit on the AP for its obvious and unprofessional bias in political reporting.

P.S. Interested in a Freeper in Congress? Keep in touch with me.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article: "The Lesson of the African Queen"

13 posted on 07/06/2006 11:31:59 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I wonder how China would like it if we gave Costa Rica nuclear technology and looked the other way when it threatened China with nuclear annihilation. Think they'd buy off on the idea we had no influence with Costa Rica?

This is pure B.S. from China. They know it and we know it.
14 posted on 07/06/2006 11:33:31 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Al Qaeda / Taliban operatives: Read the NY Times, for daily up to the minute security threat tips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Oh, malarky. Does China really think we'll believe this?


15 posted on 07/06/2006 11:33:45 AM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Is China telling the little piglet to act insane? He's doing it very well.......


16 posted on 07/06/2006 11:35:17 AM PDT by Red Badger (Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This is probably reasonably true.


17 posted on 07/06/2006 11:35:59 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
They know that *they* have nothing to fear from NK.

A nutcase with nukes, and they have nothing to fear?...........Even if we responded with a tactical nuke, the cloud would fallout over CHINA............

18 posted on 07/06/2006 11:37:00 AM PDT by Red Badger (Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: widowithfoursons

The strategic mistake is this: When this is all over, China is going to be surrounded by nations that have nuclear missiles. Japan and Taiwan, for example.

I can't believe they want that result. The only rational explanations are either that they really don't have control (which is difficult to believe), or they've miscalculated and don't realize that they are exposing themselves to increased risk.


19 posted on 07/06/2006 11:37:41 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; All
China's patience will wear thin........

With who?

You actually believe they give two sh*ts about the furor NK is creating?! Hell... I bet behind half-closed doors... they're laughing their collective a$$es off. Ditto for the ruskies. I laugh at all the western 'experts' who say that China... for their own interests... has to rein them in.

BS!

20 posted on 07/06/2006 11:39:42 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson