1 posted on
07/05/2006 8:47:12 PM PDT by
bitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: potlatch; ntnychik; Smartass; Boazo; Alamo-Girl; PhilDragoo; The Spirit Of Allegiance; JLO; ...
the enemy of my enemy COULD be my friend...
2 posted on
07/05/2006 8:48:33 PM PDT by
bitt
(NY Times to New York: Drop Dead!)
To: bitt
Just imagine the DemocRAT infighting if the Gore-Lieberman ticket had been elected.
To: bitt
The second reason for the Democrat Party's souring on Lieberman is that he IS a true moderate. Baloney. Lieberman is one of the most liberal members of the U.S. Senate. His 2005 ACU rating (8) was actually lower than Hillary Clinton's (12).
The question I find myself asking is not: "Why are so many Democrats sabotaging Lieberman's campaign?" -- but: "Why do so many Republicans insist on calling this flaming @sshole a freaking 'moderate?'"
5 posted on
07/05/2006 8:54:16 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: bitt
not once did Lieberman accuse anyone of stealing the election.This is not true. Lieberman did so at the Dem convention in 2004.
6 posted on
07/05/2006 8:55:21 PM PDT by
Bahbah
(Democrat Motto: Why not the worst)
To: bitt
It's not about about Joe Lieberman, it's about Zell Miller.
They're (kook left) afraid that Joe is a Zell.
Joe is no Zell obviously, but it is enough to scare the moonbats out of them.
7 posted on
07/05/2006 8:56:06 PM PDT by
quantim
(If the Constitution were perfect, it wouldn't have included the Senate.)
To: bitt
The poll reveals that if Lieberman runs as an Independent, he would win with 56 percent of the vote, compared with 18 percent for Lamont and 8 percent for Republican Alan Schlesinger, a moderate. And that surely angers -- even scares -- the Democrats. And 18% don't vote? What do they say when forced to make a choice?
To: bitt
The one things libs do 1000 times better than conservatives is march in step and not break formation. That makes them a formidable foe.
They may be marching off a cliff (let's hope so). Joe had the audacity to take a different, more rational route (as far as Iraq is concerned).
10 posted on
07/05/2006 8:57:49 PM PDT by
llevrok
("Drink your beer, damnit! There are people in Africa sober.")
To: bitt
Why Are Democrats and News Media Sabotaging Joe Lieberman's Campaign? To Avenge Yasser Yarafat.
To: bitt
If he loses the election in November, Lieberman will make a good cabinet member in this or a future Republican administration.
12 posted on
07/05/2006 8:59:16 PM PDT by
AZLiberty
(Creating the <a href="http://clinton.senate.gov">straddle</a> Google bomb one post at a time.)
To: bitt
Why Are Democrats and News Media Sabotaging Joe Lieberman's Campaign? His support for the War On Terror. He don't tow the kook line, so he needs to be done away with. What we're seeing is just that.
13 posted on
07/05/2006 8:59:54 PM PDT by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: bitt
Lieberman's best bet might be to try and run for the nomination after all. He might lose, but if the Hildebeast's star continues to burn out with the party faithful that would leave Gore and Kerry to battle it out with the other dwarves. It would be the ultimate irony if Lieberman could emerge as the voice of reason after those two destroyed each other.
14 posted on
07/05/2006 9:00:06 PM PDT by
WestVirginiaRebel
(Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
To: bitt
My guess is the dems are peeved at Joe for straying from the plantation and cozying up with GWB and the administration on some past issues.
It seems there are only a few dems who are ALLOWED to do that. Such dems must also mercilessly trash GWB on other issues at the same time even while they are working with him on some issues ( a la kennedy and clinton. )
Like him or not, Joe is a gentlemen, so unlike the others named above.
16 posted on
07/05/2006 9:03:01 PM PDT by
Donna Lee Nardo
(+++ DEATH TO ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AND ANIMAL AND CHILD ABUSERS +++)
To: bitt
The
Real Joe Lieberman.
17 posted on
07/05/2006 9:04:52 PM PDT by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: bitt
Consider a defeated Lieberman. Think about a high energy ex-Democrat who wants to help his country. Think about a sizable book with many, many details about his life as a Democratic insider. Think about Hannity & Colmes & Lieberman.
I don't think a loss by Joe would be all that bad, no, not at all. In fact, it might be the worst nightmare for the Dims since Zell retired.
19 posted on
07/05/2006 9:09:10 PM PDT by
Rembrandt
(We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
To: bitt
I don't think Joe is in the JFK\Truman class. maybe closer to FDR...
I really lost some respect for him, when he twisted himself into a pretzel to run as VP.
To: bitt
Joe might make a Republican yet...
23 posted on
07/05/2006 9:13:42 PM PDT by
Nachum
To: bitt
To: bitt
Every time I hear Lieberman I start looking around for Alf.
27 posted on
07/05/2006 9:16:59 PM PDT by
gov_bean_ counter
(There are only a few absolute truths in life, everything else is just an opinion.)
To: bitt
"Why Are Democrats and News Media Sabotaging Joe Lieberman's Campaign?"
For the same reason they're sabotaging America.
They're idiots.
To: bitt
Personally, I think the moonbats initially jumped ugly all over Lieberman because he did not oppose the war. Once the frustrated moonbats saw that they might have a little pull in this election they began to flex their, albeit limited, political muscle. They are now intoxicated with the their feeling of power, something they haven't collectively felt in quite a few election cycles, and Joe Lieberman is their little political whipping boy, and they feel good about beating him up.
40 posted on
07/05/2006 10:01:40 PM PDT by
Obadiah
(The beatings will continue until morale improves.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
