Posted on 07/03/2006 1:04:08 PM PDT by NebraskaCornConservative
Arrest of American Islamist Highlights Homegrown Terrorist Threat
By Chris Zambelis
On June 6, British authorities arrested Syed "Fahad" Hashmi, a 26 year-old American citizen of Pakistani descent, in London's Heathrow Airport for his suspected role in aiding an al-Qaeda plot to attack targets in London and delivering military equipment and funds to radical Islamists in Pakistan and Afghanistan. The apprehension marked the latest in a series of arrests of alleged radicals with ties to Islamist militants. British security officials apprehended Hashmi as he was preparing to board a plane for Pakistan carrying a large amount of cash (The News, June 25; Daily Times, June 18). He remains in British custody and is currently fighting an extradition request by U.S. authorities. Hashmi holds a British student visa and has been living in Great Britain for the last three years (The Times [London], June 8). The U.S. indictment against him alleges that he and one unnamed associate, believed to be Mohammed Junaid Babar, another U.S. citizen of Pakistani descent, convicted for aiding al-Qaeda, conspired to assist al-Qaeda between January 2004 and May 2006 (Dawn, July 9, 2005; Dawn, August 12, 2004). On the surface, Hashmi's arrest represents a success for joint counter-terrorism efforts in the war against al-Qaeda. Hashmi's background and turn toward radicalism, however, raises another set of serious concerns related to the growing threat of homegrown Islamist militants in the United States.
Although Hashmi was born in Pakistan, his family moved to the United States when he was a child. He was raised in the neighborhood of Flushing, in the Queens section of New York City. Flushing is one of New York City's most ethnically diverse neighborhoods and includes a sizeable Pakistani immigrant and South Asian Muslim community. Hashmi attended Robert F. Wagner High School in Queens and later enrolled at Stony Brook University on Long Island before transferring to Brooklyn College, where he graduated with a degree in Political Science and was a leading member of a campus Muslim association (New York Daily News, June 10; Dawn, August 12, 2004).
Hashmi is alleged to have links with the New York City branch of the radical al-Muhajiroun (The Emigrants), a militant Islamist organization formerly based in London. The group was founded by Syrian militant Omar Bakri Mohammed as an affiliate of the local branch of the transnational Hizb ut-Tahrir (Liberation Party) movement (http://www.hizb-ut-tahrir.org). He split with Hizb ut-Tahrir and adopted an increasingly radical stance, especially after the September 11 attacks. Al-Muhajiroun was known for its presence in London and other Western cities and its following among South Asian radicals in Europe (Daily Times, June 18).
Hashmi invited a member of al-Muhajiroun to speak at the campus of Brooklyn College after the September 11 attacks, an event that led to controversy (New York Daily News, June 9). Although al-Muhajiroun has since disbanded, a number of offshoot organizations have emerged to fill the vacuum. These include the radical Islamic Thinkers Society (ITS), which is based in the neighborhood of Jackson Heights in Queens (http://www.islamicthinkers.com). Hashmi was a known follower of ITS.
Hashmi, who is described by those who knew him as a quiet, bright and caring young man, was formerly affiliated with a mainstream Muslim youth group in the 1990s at the Islamic Circle of North America in Jamaica, Queens (http://www.icna.org). According to one source at the center, Hashmi's radicalization occurred when he strayed from the Jamaica Center for al-Muhajiroun and that he became a different person as a result. Others say that a trip to London and witnessing the arrest of his cousin during a political rally were what drove him to al-Muhajiroun. Hashmi emerged as one of the group's top recruiters. He is also alleged to have introduced Mohammed Junaid Babar to the movement. Significantly, Junaid Babar was also raised in Queens, where he attended St. John's University (New York Daily News, June 9).
Heed these words of warning and Happy Fourth!
Welcome to FR.
If you'll pardon my curiosity, got any *real conservatives* in mind?
welcome to FR
Now this is interesting.....
Until we get a real conservative government that cares about America in the White House
REAL? On this war just how would you prosecute it differently? I talking about the real world, not some wacko fantasyland.
;-)
Hey, if we're (westerners in general, Americans in particular)going to be branded with the scarlet letter for "abusing" them, we may as well BE the Bully and get this over with.
Thanks. I am a longtime reader of the posts. Finally decided to add my two cents. Not the best typist so I plan to read more than post.
I do not know who the answer is, but as a self-styled 'old time' conservative, I am not happy where I see us going. I am not happy about Iraq, immigration, and other things. W dissapointed me. Cheney and Rummy as well. Who is out there? Beats me. Rudy is a liberal....and a big one. I don't think McCain has what it takes. Who knows?
"Homegrown" ha!
I must say I am unhappy with W and the boys for how Iraq has ended up. I was a big supporter of the war but it does not look good for us in the long run. I have a funny feeling that the next election will be about both parties trying to convince voters who is going to get us out of there early. Maybe I'm wrong. Don't expect much from an old Nebraska corn farmer!
I guess to answer your question, Iraq for me was a mistake. I would have instead chosen to focus more on Afghanistan and Homeland Security especially border security and ports.
imagine the possibilities.
I must say I am unhappy with W and the boys for how Iraq has ended up.
Ended up? You mean the three election since OIF? You mean that the rape room are closed down, you mean that oone of the worst dictators in modern time is now sitting in a cell being tried by the Iraqi people. People in the area are now asking....disturbing questions of their leaders, questions. Under Saddam there were 3 (that's 1...2...3) newspapers in Iraq today there are something like 150, you can't swing a dead cat w/o hitting a satellite dish. Schools are being rebuilt, teachers are now being paid (unlike under Saddam). if you play on the national soccer team you don't have to worry that Uday willl have you knee caps broken if you have a bad game (ok this is not a huge thing, but it speaks to just what kind of regime and people ran Iraq). The terrorist (and I might add the leaders of Syria, Iran) understand just what is at stake in Iraq, and just how successful we have been. Why do you think they are sending so many fighters there? Is it perfect? Are there problems? Of course there are (Name me a country where things are perfect, where there are no problems.. Sometime read some history of the early years of our Republic and then you'll understand just how far how fast the Iraqis have come.
If you're talking about the casualties. May I remind you that 143 years ago 51,112 (23,049 Union and 28,063 Confederate) men were killed or wounded in 3 days that's 1..2...3 day not 2500 in 3+ years.
focus more on Afghanistan and Homeland Security especially border security and ports.
You're absolutly right, if he had only done that we would not have suffered all the terrorist attacks we've had here in America.....oh wait I forgot WE HAVEN'T HAD ANY. Do you think that is just a fluke?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.