Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Even though it's from the nyt, actually it was not a bad read until I got to Bill Clinton's day at the end.
1 posted on 07/03/2006 8:16:30 AM PDT by mathprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mathprof

Funny...yesterday I watch two programs on Thomas Jefferson....one was showing his letters where he said blacks were inferior, smelled differently, sweated differently and were just different than whites in everything. The other show had a guy SAYING that Thomas Jefferson was Horrified that the Declaration didn't address slavery. One of them is LYING about Jefferson...which one??


2 posted on 07/03/2006 8:19:49 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mathprof

Does anyone know the dates Clinton ignored information that could have led to the capture of Bin Laden? We need to include those dates if we're going to include the training camps near miss.


3 posted on 07/03/2006 8:20:28 AM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mathprof

Hmmm I actually hate to have come down with Clinton and the Slimes, but I would say that in our ability to look back that would have indeed been a momentous occasion in history had he actually have been hit,, then again if it worked and 9/11 never happened it would have just been a blip on history's radar screen.


5 posted on 07/03/2006 8:22:30 AM PDT by aft_lizard (born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mathprof
some accounts suggest that the attack may have missed killing Osama bin Laden by as little as an hour. How that would have changed America — and the world — may be revealed, in time

If ifs and whats were cherries and nuts we'd all have a Merry Christmas.

6 posted on 07/03/2006 8:23:32 AM PDT by ILS21R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mathprof

President Clinton has to make every list good or bad. That is funny that Aug 20 would be more important than find Sadam or the first man on the moon or practically anything. lol.


8 posted on 07/03/2006 8:26:45 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mathprof

Number 10 is total crap. It should be referred to as 'The day a few camels and empty tent got blowed up real good, cost the US tax payers ten's of millions and changed nothing'.


11 posted on 07/03/2006 8:33:54 AM PDT by Jaxter ("Vivit Post Funera Virtus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mathprof

of course clinton could have taken bin ladin from the sudanese

click to hear clinton admit he let bin ladin get away...

http://www.newsmax.com/clinton2.mp3

Bin Laden Arrest Offer Spurned as Clinton Met Lewinsky

At least two offers from the government of Sudan to arrest Osama bin Laden and turn him over to the U.S. were rebuffed by the Clinton administration in February and March of 1996, a period of time when the former president's attention was distracted by his intensifying relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky.

One of the offers took place during a secret meeting in Washington, the same day Clinton was meeting with Lewinsky in the White House just miles away.

On Feb. 6, 1996, then-U.S. Ambassador to the Sudan Tim Carney met with Sudanese Foreign Minister Ali Osman Mohammed Taha at Taha's home in the capital city of Khartoum. The meeting took place just a half mile from bin Laden's residence at the time, according to Richard Miniter's book "Losing bin Laden."

During the meeting, Carney reminded the Sudanese official that Washington was increasingly nervous about the presence of bin Laden in Sudan, reports Miniter.

Foreign Minister Taha countered by saying that Sudan was very concerned about its poor relationship with the U.S.

Then came the bombshell offer:

"If you want bin Laden, we will give you bin Laden," Foreign Minister Taha told Ambassador Carney.

Still, with the extraordinarily fortuitous offer on the table, back in Washington President Clinton had other things on his mind.


A timeline of events chronicled in the Starr Report shows that during the period of late January through March 1996, Mr. Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky was then at its most intense.

On Feb. 4, 1996, for instance - two days before Ambassador Carney's key meeting with the Sudanese Foreign Minister, the president was focused not on Osama bin Laden, but instead on the 23-year-old White House intern.

Their rendezvous that day included a sexual encounter followed by a leisurely chat between Clinton and Lewinsky, as the two "sat and talked [afterward] for about 45 minutes," according to the Starr Report.

Later in the afternoon that same day, as Sudanese officials weighed their decision to offer bin Laden to the U.S., Clinton found time to call Lewinsky "[to say] he had enjoyed their time together." If there were any calls from Clinton to the State Department or Khartoum that day, the records have yet to surface in published reports.

The Feb. 4 encounter with Lewinsky followed a period of intense contact detailed in the Starr report in interviews with the former White House intern, including a sexual encounter on Jan. 6, 1996, several sessions of phone sex during the week of Jan. 14 - 21, and another sexual encounter on Jan. 21.

Sudan's offer to the U.S. for bin Laden's extradition remained on the table for at least a month, and was reiterated by Sudanese officials who traveled to Washington as late as March 10, 1996.

On March 3, Sudan's Minister of State for Defense Elfatih Erwa met secretly with Ambassador Carney, another State Department official and the CIA's Africa bureau Director of Operations at an Arlington, Va., hotel, according to Miniter's book.

Erwa was handed a list of issues the U.S. wanted taken care of if relations were to improve. The list included a demand for information on bin Laden's terrorist network inside Sudan.

Erwa replied that he would have to consult with Sudan's President Omar Hassan al-Bashir about the list. When he returned for a March 10, 1996 meeting with the CIA's Africa bureau chief, "Erwa would be empowered to make an extraordinary offer," writes Miniter.

On instructions from its president, the government of Sudan agreed to arrest bin Laden and hand him over to U.S law enforcement at a time and place of the Clinton administration's choosing. "Where should we send him?" Erwa asked the CIA representative.

President Clinton has acknowledged being fully briefed on the Sudanese efforts to turn over the 9/11 mastermind, admitting that he made the final decision to turn the offer down.

"The Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again," Clinton confirmed during a February 2002 speech to a New York business group.

"They released him. At the time, 1996, he had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America."

As chronicled in the Starr report, however, Clinton's relationship with Lewinsky proved to be a growing distraction around this time.

Two weeks before the secret meeting between Erwa, Carney and the CIA bureau chief, the president summoned Lewinsky to the White House to inform her that he "no longer felt right" about their relationship and it would have to be suspended until after the election.

Lewinsky explained, however, that Clinton's decision to put their relationship on hold did little to change its basic character, telling Starr's investigators, "There'd continue to be this flirtation when we'd see each other."

The Starr report noted, "In late February or March [1996], the president telephoned her at home and said he was disappointed that, because she had already left the White House for the evening, they could not get together."

The call, Lewinsky said, "sort of implied to me that he was interested in starting up again."

On March 10, 1996, as Sudanese Defense Minister Erwa was making his extraordinary offer for bin Laden's arrest to the CIA's Africa bureau chief, Clinton met with Lewinsky in the White House.

The Starr report:

"On March 10, 1996, Ms. Lewinsky took a visiting friend, Natalie Ungvari, to the White House. They bumped into the president, who said when Ms. Lewinsky introduced them, 'You must be her friend from California.' Ms. Ungvari was 'shocked' that the president knew where she was from."

Though there was no physical contact that day, three weeks later, on March 31, 1996, Clinton resumed his sexual relationship with Lewinsky.

It was around this time, the president later admitted, that he was involved in delicate negotiations to try to persuade Riyadh to take bin Laden, after refusing to accept his extradition to the U.S.

"I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have," Clinton admitted in the 2002 speech. "But they thought it was a hot potato and they didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan."

On April 7, 1996, Monica Lewinsky was transferred to the Pentagon. Around the same time, the administration's hunt for bin Laden finally seemed to begin in earnest. Just weeks after Clinton spurned Sudan's bin Laden offer, for instance, the CIA created a separate operational unit dedicated to tracking down bin Laden in Sudan.

But it happened too late to capture the 9/11 mastermind. On May 18, 1996, bin Laden boarded a chartered plane in Khartoum with his wives, children, some 150 al-Qaida jihadists and a cache of arms - and flew off to Jalalabad, Afghanistan.


17 posted on 07/03/2006 8:41:53 AM PDT by edzo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mathprof

Anti-American revisionism alert!


25 posted on 07/03/2006 9:11:28 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mathprof
If the New York Times had been around during the Revolutionary War:


26 posted on 07/03/2006 9:24:09 AM PDT by capt. norm (W.C. Fields: "The time has come to take the bull by the tail and face the situation".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mathprof

I'm not sure the NYT should have started the article with those five particular words.


32 posted on 07/03/2006 10:35:42 AM PDT by Son Of The Godfather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson