Skip to comments.
North Korea says to bolster deterrent against U.S(North Korean Delusion Alert)
Reuters Wire via Yahoo News ^
| 07/02/2006
Posted on 07/02/2006 2:54:57 AM PDT by garbageseeker
Kim Il Jung is having delusions of a United States attack. In the meantime while he is having his delusions, in reality his people are starving.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: atomic; atomicwar; clintonlegacy; deterrent; icbm; interception; japan; kimjongil; launch; missile; missiledefense; nkorea; northkorea; nuclearwar; proliferation; southkorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: DB
The bigger question is are his generals crazy enough to follow his orders if he does order it.
There's no indication Dear Leader is sane and there's no guessing the thought process of the insane.
When you live with the insane, your sanity is in question.
21
posted on
07/02/2006 5:11:08 AM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: tet68
Very true.
Though wanting to live is pretty deep-seated.
22
posted on
07/02/2006 5:20:12 AM PDT
by
DB
(©)
To: garbageseeker
the Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of the FatherlandShouldn't that be the "Motherland" ???
23
posted on
07/02/2006 5:29:43 AM PDT
by
tlj18
(Shipping out for Basic Combat Training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, on July 27, 2006)
To: metesky; Simargal
Check out his one other post and you'll see the same type of language use. I'm guessing our new FReeper is overseas and using translation software. I could be mistaken (wouldn't be the first time).
Simargal. Welcom to FR. Please use small words and short sentences... it's all I can handle.
24
posted on
07/02/2006 5:35:04 AM PDT
by
Toadman
To: Cindy
Re #2
He tries to get us scared again. I dare him to nuke us.
All talk, and no action. He cannot even dare to fire his dinky missile, whose guidance system is suspect at best. Why do you think that he could nuke us?:)
To: DB
Having atomic bombs and "weaponizing" them are two entirely different things. Although he *may* have built a few crude bombs, unless he has a viable method of arming and delivering them, then they are useless to him. The "Little Boy" bomb in 1945 weighed 10 tons, and the Enola Gay very nearly ran out of runway when taking off for the Hiroshima mission.
Kim could conceivably put a bomb on a tramp trawler and attempt to sail it into a port someone, but I figure that if I can think of something like this, then the U.S. Navy and Coast Guard also can and have taken appropriate measures to guard against this.
To: Simargal
You know you're an idiot, doncha? Please don't tell me that you're not, I have to judge you by your own words, not any pointless et tuque assertions to the contrary.
27
posted on
07/02/2006 6:25:12 AM PDT
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
To: garbageseeker
I guess the North Korean definition of deterrent is to be outnumbered 5,000:1, have no missile defense, and the enemy has the ability to knock down your missile.
To: Simargal
The problem here is that their leader is crazy and delusional enough to launch. His country would be a smoking hole but that doesn't matter to a guy who is wants to be a martyr and go down in history. Kim's legions of yes-men are telling him that he's divine and only 2nd to God. Kim just may figure that he can hide out in a bunker and a few million less mouths to feed are no big deal.
To: Cindy
Sounds like their rocket will fizzle off the launch pad on July 4th.
Thanks for the ronery fireworks Kim
30
posted on
07/02/2006 8:43:21 AM PDT
by
spokeshave
(I'd rather go hunting with Dick Cheney than drive over a bridge with Ted Kennedy)
To: garbageseeker
I am coming to the conclusion that Kim has no nukes.
If he had, there would have been a test, either in NK or
Iran. There hasn't been, if there was we'd know about it.
He's got nothing, so why are we letting him play us?
31
posted on
07/02/2006 10:53:55 AM PDT
by
rahbert
To: Simargal
they doen't bom other countries They do mode, though. They did a lot more than bom S Kor.
32
posted on
07/02/2006 11:28:20 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
To: rahbert
there would have been a test Perhaps there have been tests. It's has not always been clear even when a test was announced if it was nuke or not.
33
posted on
07/02/2006 11:31:28 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
To: DB
A possibility
34
posted on
07/02/2006 12:05:04 PM PDT
by
garbageseeker
(It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.”Samuel Clemmens)
To: rahbert
I really do think that they have nukes. If the IAEA and all the world's intelligence agencies agree if NK Korea have nukes,then they must have nukes. The IAEA is always at odds with the world in regards to the United States and nuclear weapons.A good poker player never shows their cards.Rather instead to bluff the other player.
If he had, there would have been a test, either in NK or Iran. There hasn't been, if there was we'd know about it
If North Korea or Iran tested a nuclear weapon, they would be subject to international sanctions and the wrath of the international community. North Korea currently is surviving on the charity of the world community and cannot afford more sanctions.
35
posted on
07/02/2006 12:20:47 PM PDT
by
garbageseeker
(It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.”Samuel Clemmens)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
You bet.
36
posted on
07/02/2006 12:23:22 PM PDT
by
garbageseeker
(It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.”Samuel Clemmens)
To: garbageseeker
A statement carried by the North's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on Saturday condemned as provocative a U.S. decision to deploy an updated version of its U-2 spy plane in South Korea. Aurora?
37
posted on
07/02/2006 12:27:05 PM PDT
by
Philistone
(Turning lead into gold...)
To: sgtbono2002
Kim is no crazier than Chavez or Ahmadinejhad.
It is always a mistake to allow people like these
to continue to live and breathe in this world.
38
posted on
07/02/2006 1:07:08 PM PDT
by
LeoWindhorse
(strive on with heedfulness)
To: metesky
Here is its other response:
It is amusing to observe as participants of this forum nothing knowing about other countries try to express about them the opinion. By the way Putin's program is focused basically on the poor countries of the East Europe. Russian of the Central Asia in the basic weight live in Kazakhstan and do not want emigrate anywhere. In difference disorganized from submission of your country of Ukraine, Georgia and others where Bush managed to put the nationalists.
That Bush... all powerful.
39
posted on
07/02/2006 1:39:32 PM PDT
by
TenthAmendmentChampion
(Pray for our President and for our heroes in Iraq and Afghanistan, and around the world!)
To: Simargal
40
posted on
07/02/2006 1:39:44 PM PDT
by
Menehune56
(Oderint Dum Metuant (Let them hate, so long as they fear - Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC)))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson