Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roots Of Human Family Tree Are Shallow
ABC News ^ | 7-1-2006 | Matt Clenson

Posted on 07/01/2006 4:12:22 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-156 next last
To: Ostlandr; xcamel
Actually what they're talking about is the apparent evidence that the human race went through a genetic "bottleneck" about 70k years ago. Apparently we went from a thriving species to a small band of survivors.

It isn't even saying that. Even if humanity had never had a bottleneck and had had a constant population of a billion people at every point in time into the distant past, it *still* wouldn't take long (well, less time than you'd expect anyway) for one person to eventually be the great-great-great-etc. grandparent of every one of the billion people alive a few thousand years later.

Smaller populations *speed up* this process, but it happens eventually even with huge populations.

41 posted on 07/01/2006 5:13:51 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

That would be two common ancestors, not one.


42 posted on 07/01/2006 5:14:06 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

....I'm well aware of that likelihood....I was being facetious


43 posted on 07/01/2006 5:14:08 PM PDT by Armigerous ( Non permitte illegitimi te carborundum- "Don't let the bastards grind you down")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
Anyone who has read the Bible knows who the person was.

Sorry, read the full article and the rest of the replies. It has nothing to do with a one-person bottleneck.

44 posted on 07/01/2006 5:14:59 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
They, too, had ancestors, and so on back a long, long way.

All the way back to grandpappy Icheneumon, a know-it-all proto-bacterium (I seem to recall a Gary Larson cartoon).

45 posted on 07/01/2006 5:14:59 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: tomzz
HIs name was either Adam or Noah, according to whether or not any humans actually survived the flood other than in the ark.

Wrong again, see my previous reply. And note that the researcher's model produced its results even while assuming that the population was never smaller than tens of thousands.

This is just a result of ordinary population dynamics, and in no way any evidence of any kind of Adam/Noah bottleneck, because it happens in ANY population eventually.

46 posted on 07/01/2006 5:16:43 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
Where does Lucy fit in the picture? "Lucy" was found in 1974 near Hadar in Ethiopia. Her skeleton has provided a wealth of information about the ancestral line of human beings, some of it quite surprising. Scientists estimate that A. afarensis lived from approximately 4 million years ago (or earlier) to around 2.7 millions years ago.

She was an even more distant ancestor (or at least one of her contemporaries was -- the individual known as Lucy may of course have died before having children).

The time of a "last common ancestor" is not the same as an "original ancestor" -- the LCA themselves had distant ancestors of their own, who are also common ancestors of us all, just not the *last* one (i.e. the one most recent in time).

47 posted on 07/01/2006 5:18:58 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
This is just a result of ordinary population dynamics, and in no way any evidence of any kind of Adam/Noah bottleneck

Then there's the Darwin/Ichneumon rubberneck: straining to see which Darwin award-winner got creamed by the bus of extinction on the superwayhighway of evolution.

48 posted on 07/01/2006 5:20:32 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer; blam; VadeRetro
Darwin commented that all species came from a single mated pair of its kind where pairing was a requisite to reproduction.

No, no he didn't. You've got the process of speciation wrong.

49 posted on 07/01/2006 5:21:28 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

Darwinist cat fight!


50 posted on 07/01/2006 5:22:21 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
Then there's the Darwin/Ichneumon rubberneck: straining to see which Darwin award-winner got creamed by the bus of extinction on the superwayhighway of evolution.

Life is funny like that.

51 posted on 07/01/2006 5:23:12 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
"Where does Lucy fit in the picture? "

Can't say for sure but, very early. The ancient direct line that produced modern humans has died out in Africa.

52 posted on 07/01/2006 5:26:36 PM PDT by blam (Monthly Donors Are Happier FReepers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

You said -- "That would be two common ancestors, not one."

And my pappy always told me it took two...

Regards,
Star Traveler


53 posted on 07/01/2006 5:28:12 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

I just read the full article, and it does sound rather interesting, but I think they fail to account for the fact that just one obstinate little inbred group (i.e., the Sentinelese) that isolated itself, say, 10,000 years ago, screws up the simulation. Personally, I suspect the true last common ancestor - the last person that lived who now appears on every single family tree - lived around 15,000 to 20,000 years ago.


54 posted on 07/01/2006 5:28:47 PM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

You said -- "Sorry, read the full article and the rest of the replies. It has nothing to do with a one-person bottleneck."

We all still came from that boat ride... Whatever else happened, that might be another story.

Regards,
Star Traveler


55 posted on 07/01/2006 5:30:11 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Gene Study Identifies Five Main Human Populations
56 posted on 07/01/2006 5:31:13 PM PDT by blam (Monthly Donors Are Happier FReepers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles; Old_Professor; blam
Darwinist cat fight!

I'm not aware that Old Professor is necessarily a "Darwinist". In any case, I see that he and I have had this conversation before.

57 posted on 07/01/2006 5:31:30 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Ostlandr
"-The survivors of the last supervolcano eruption 70,000 years ago"

Late Pleostocene Human Bottlenecks. . . (Toba)

"The last glacial period was preceded by 1000 years of the coldest temperatures of the Late Pleistocene, apparently caused by the eruption of the Mount Toba volcano. The six year long volcanic winter and 1000-year-long instant Ice Age that followed Mount Toba's eruption may have decimated Modern Man's entire population. Genetic evidence suggests that Human population size fell to about 10,000 adults between 50 and 100 thousand years ago. The survivors from this global catastrophy would have found refuge in isolated tropical pockets, mainly in Equatorial Africa. Populations living in Europe and northern China would have been completely eliminated by the reduction of the summer temperatures by as much as 12 degrees centigrade."

58 posted on 07/01/2006 5:36:43 PM PDT by blam (Monthly Donors Are Happier FReepers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam
What I do find interesting is that modern atheist science keeps evoking themes that found earlier expression in Judeo-Christian scriptures.

"In the beginning" = Big Bang. Adam/Eve = shared common ancestor in the past several thousand years.

Other Christian scriptures prophesy worldwide devastation by natural phenomena including a "burning mountain hurled into the sea" which atheist science now concedes has happened in the past and assures us will happen again.

It annoys the atheists. But it just makes me chuckle.

59 posted on 07/01/2006 5:37:57 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
"Hmm.. I'm skeptical in the utmost extreme. The last common human ancestor needs to cover the Sentinelese, among other aboriginals who were isolated from the main branch of humanity well before recorded history."

The oldest human DNA presently alive on earth belongs to the Orang Asli

60 posted on 07/01/2006 5:43:24 PM PDT by blam (Monthly Donors Are Happier FReepers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-156 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson