Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BILL KELLER BELONGS IN JAIL FOR TREASON
To the Point Newsletter ^ | 6.28.06 | Jack Kelly

Posted on 06/30/2006 6:57:31 PM PDT by lancer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
For the sake of the nation's security, the Times must be prosecuted, most especially its Editor, Bill Keller.

Doesn't get much clearer than that. Do your duty, Mr. President!

1 posted on 06/30/2006 6:57:34 PM PDT by lancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lancer

The NYT has published the street addresses of Cheney and Rumsfeld's summer homes.

In the "Escapes" section of the June 30 edition, the N.Y. Times printed huge color photos of the vacation residences of Cheney and Rumsfeld, "identifying the small Maryland town where they live, showing their front driveways and, in Rumsfeld's case, actually pointing out the hidden security camera in case any hostile intruders should get careless," Horowitz writes.

Times Travel section writer Peter Kilborn even makes sure enemies of the two men will know such details as where Mrs. Rumsfeld shops in the eastern shore town of St. Michaels, Md. where the two administration officials have weekend retreats.

He even lets the curious know what street the Cheneys and Rumsfelds have to use to get to their own road.

It's all part of the war against President Bush, Horowitz charges.


2 posted on 06/30/2006 6:59:14 PM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

10 years or $10,000?

Flush the traitors down the toilet.

If they don't fit, apply laws of physics in whatever way most suits the jury.


3 posted on 06/30/2006 7:05:46 PM PDT by Quix (PRAY AND WORK WHILE THERE'S DAY! Many very dark nights are looming. Thankfully, God is still God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lancer

Google: Results 1 - 100 of about 218,000 English pages for bill keller treason. (0.33 seconds)


4 posted on 06/30/2006 7:06:31 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lancer
Jail!

Hell, he needs to swing.

5 posted on 06/30/2006 7:07:29 PM PDT by Covenantor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lancer
We spend tens of billions of dollars each year on (often not very good) intelligence. But all al Qaeda needs to buy is a subscription to the New York Times.

Yeah, and look again at the Left's relentless attacks on cutting the Intel's budget over the years! John F'n Kerry is always 100% to cut all Military & Intel funding.

And yet look how quickly the liberals/demonrats are quick to reflexively say "ITS BUSH'S FAULT" if something goes wrong: From hurricane Katrina devastating Louisiana to the farce of the many 9/11 investigations - its all Bush fault in their book.

But here we have (AGAIN) the NY Slimes in their latest & greatest war against Bush and the USA, and not strangely enough the Left is deafeningly silent!!!

Did anyone here notice that in the House that ONLY 8 democrats voted with the Republicans to Condemn the NY Slimes?? The remaining 188 all voted NO to not condemn the NY Slimes!!!

6 posted on 06/30/2006 7:11:23 PM PDT by prophetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lancer
JUST FOR FUN, CLICK HERE
7 posted on 06/30/2006 7:12:42 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lancer

I would love to see The Prez push for the Times to be prosecuted but, it could be disastrous. He would always be remembered as the President who tried to destroy the First Amendment.


8 posted on 06/30/2006 7:15:07 PM PDT by no dems (www.4condi.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
He would always be remembered as the President who tried to destroy the First Amendment.

No he wouldn't. It has been attempted before...

9 posted on 06/30/2006 7:17:07 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Cool!


10 posted on 06/30/2006 7:17:11 PM PDT by no dems (www.4condi.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Please pass it on.


11 posted on 06/30/2006 7:21:05 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: no dems

I disagree. Not only would it be the right thing to do, it would trample the Democrats. I don't see a downside.


12 posted on 06/30/2006 7:21:41 PM PDT by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lancer
My son is, at present, in Iraq. He rides escort for the convoys of supplies going to the troops all through the country. He is exposed to the IEDs on the roads daily. If something happens to him as a result of this treacherous act on the part of the press I promise my undying enmity toward these arrogant swine. Somehow, someway a price will be exacted and, God willing, I will have a part to play in making them pay.

What about the others? Their Fathers should be of like mind. I can't speak for them. I am responsible only for the one.They should be responsible for theirs.

13 posted on 06/30/2006 7:24:28 PM PDT by Adrastus (If you don't like my attitude, talk to some one else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

The First Amendment does not- and never has- served as a shield to hide treason behind.

The issue before us is NOT a Frist Amendment issue. It might be if the Administration had taken legal steps to prevent the Times from publishing; that's prior restraint.

But, they DID publish, and publishing has consequences. In this case, if the President and his Attorney General will do their duties, the consequence will be prosecution and probable conviction on voilating the espionage act, and maybe treason.

Incidentally, the volation of the espionage act, a slam-dunk on the facts and law, exposes the Times to seizure of its assets. It time we put those seizure laws to some good use.


14 posted on 06/30/2006 7:26:14 PM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Adrastus
The Veterans for the Truth are waging another war, this time against Jack Murtha. Check this out.

If we have to take them down one at a time, there is no better place to start than Jack Murtha.

Prayers for your son's safety and for the safety of all the troops.

15 posted on 06/30/2006 7:35:07 PM PDT by lancer (If you are not with us, you are against us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lancer
Section 798 to the Espionage Act of 1917. It reads in part:

"Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits...or publishes ...any classified information...concerning the communications intelligence activities of the United States...shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."

Worth repeating till the chickens come home to roost!

16 posted on 06/30/2006 7:36:43 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (I'd rather be carrying a shotgun with Dick, than riding shotgun with a Kennedyl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lancer
Jail? He and his ilk will have Americans murdered,
along with the President and Vice President if he gets his way.

He should be electrocuted. Give him the chair.

17 posted on 06/30/2006 8:06:49 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist
Someone here is going to have to explain to me how a financial database stored on a computer server in Belgium -- and presumably accessible by a number of people who: 1) have no security clearance through the U.S. Department of Defense, and 2) don't even answer to U.S. law under any circumstances -- could possibly meet the definition of "classified information" under Section 798 of the Espionage Act of 1917.
18 posted on 06/30/2006 8:09:56 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Let's see. Now why would a code like Purple or Orange
be classified during war when they only use letters known to all?

Or how about Churchills Operation Fish, when it used boats and securities (transferred to Canada when it appeared
that England might lose) which were known to all in banking in England?

You might try to act sharper than the dullest knife in the drawer.

19 posted on 06/30/2006 8:18:11 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lancer

I have had severe diarrhea with more integrity than Pinch Sulzberger, Bill Keller, Eric Lichtblau, and James Risen put together. Oh, and more valuable to the environment, as well.


20 posted on 06/30/2006 8:41:32 PM PDT by MainFrame65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson