Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

no comment.........
1 posted on 06/29/2006 4:53:22 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Sub-Driver

Try telling the Chinese and the Venezuelans that the Continental Shelf is "protected". They plan to drill there anyway, Popeye.


2 posted on 06/29/2006 4:55:49 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

How come we can drill offshore Texas and LIKE it?


3 posted on 06/29/2006 4:56:01 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Hey Nance you stupid Cu**, what the f**k is YOUR POLICY. (needless to say I am ticked off-the SC pushed me over the edge today).

Mike McGaughey


4 posted on 06/29/2006 4:56:27 PM PDT by mrmargaritaville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I'll comment...

Boy, she really is dumb.




She wants us to believe that an oil policy is not an energy policy, all the while she appears all over the place complaining about high energy prices caused by the high cost of oil.


5 posted on 06/29/2006 4:56:51 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Boy, Nan is sure busy these days "issuing statements".

Gotta keep quite a staff to write all those big words for her and actually complete a coherent sentence.


6 posted on 06/29/2006 4:57:59 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Pelosi: Republican Energy Policy Is to Drill in Protected Areas and Give Tax Breaks to Big Oil

So? What's not to like? No wonder the Democrats can't win.

7 posted on 06/29/2006 4:58:01 PM PDT by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Ditto


9 posted on 06/29/2006 5:00:14 PM PDT by CAWats (And I will make no distinction between terrorists and the democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
And the Democrat's energy policy is to take away people's cars and ban any method whatsoever that can produce energy (especially the cleanest source: nuclear). Want to bet which one Americans like more in the coming elections?

Most American's will be thinking: "Which one do I chose? The North Korea-Cuba method or the Republican's way? Hmm...."
10 posted on 06/29/2006 5:03:25 PM PDT by burzum (Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.--Adm. Rickover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Every time she opens her mouth she proves she can count her IQ on one hand and still have fingers left over.


11 posted on 06/29/2006 5:03:30 PM PDT by MadAnthony1776 ("liberalism" = "do as I say, not as I do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
"Pelosi" and "Drill" in the same sentance... ...somebody should be sent to GitMo


13 posted on 06/29/2006 5:05:35 PM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Oh Nancy,

Increasing the supply of oil and natural gas with off shore drilling will lower the price. More supply, lower prices . . .

Econ 099, Nancy . . . Econ 099


14 posted on 06/29/2006 5:07:26 PM PDT by Rodm (Seest thou a man diligent in his business? He shall stand before kings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Why are you against cheaper fuel for your impoverished voters you bugged eyed twit? Because the Republicans and the Americans want it? She needs to visit an oil platform and someone needs to give her a good shove over the edge.


17 posted on 06/29/2006 5:10:55 PM PDT by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Ugh! Does this lady EVER say anything that doesn't sound like a copy and paste liberal cliche?


18 posted on 06/29/2006 5:14:43 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Republican Energy Policy Is to Drill in Protected Areas and Give Tax Breaks to Big Oil

Yeah and....
19 posted on 06/29/2006 5:16:32 PM PDT by SICSEMPERTYRANNUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

The funny thing is that you get all this carping from the left at how expensive this or that is but if you do the research they are most likely the cause, ie energy, health care, insurance, etc.


21 posted on 06/29/2006 5:20:16 PM PDT by SICSEMPERTYRANNUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Question to all you guys in CA. How the hell did your guys elect this one and Boxer?


22 posted on 06/29/2006 5:20:55 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Pelosi: Republican Energy Policy Is to Drill in Protected Areas and Give Tax Breaks to Big Oil

                  
23 posted on 06/29/2006 5:22:52 PM PDT by Libertarian444
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
"The Republican answer to our energy crisis is to drill in protected areas and provide tax breaks to Big Oil."

I wonder if it would be worth the time to tell this DIM bulb that corporations don't pay taxes....

Though Republican leadership has declared this to be 'Energy Week' in the House, we are merely considering one energy related bill, and it does nothing to provide relief at the pump today.

This is semi-true. I does NOTHING to provide relief at the pump TODAY. But it sure would help out later on...

It is just a ruse to cover up Republicans' failed record on energy...

...only because ANY relief offered by the GOP was thwarted at every turn by DIMS...

which has resulted in record prices for consumers...

...due to record demand for crude...

...record profits for Big Oil...

...who made 1/3 of what the Government took in...

...record dependence on foreign oil...

...a record we could decrease IF we could produce more DOMESTICALLY!

What is really frightening is that if Pelosi and the rest of the DIMs are the "best and brightest" of the populace, the ones that voted for them have to be significantly less intelligent...

24 posted on 06/29/2006 5:23:34 PM PDT by dirtbiker (I've tried to see the liberal point of view, but I couldn't get my head that far up my a$$....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Like so many Republican bills, this bill is also fiscally irresponsible. It redirects federal royalty payments from the treasury to coastal states where drilling is occurring offshore on the Outer Continental Shelf.

"We do not know what the cost to the federal treasury will be in the long run, but we know it will be huge. Last week, the Bush Administration estimated that the bill would cost the treasury $69 billion dollars over 15 years.

Let me see if I got this right, were not drilling off shore at these areas now so there isn't any royalties to the Federal Government now. But she's bitchin' that it would cost the Feds $69b over 15 years cause the royalties would go to the states not the Congress critters if they pass the drilling bill.

What a freaking bimbo!!

30 posted on 06/29/2006 5:37:52 PM PDT by fedupjohn (If we try to fight the war on terror with eyes shut + ears packed with wax, innocent people will die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

This awful, greedy, big oil benefiting, environment destroying Republican bill sounds like great news for the energy sector portion of my 401K.


33 posted on 06/29/2006 5:47:51 PM PDT by hauerf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson