[Jay777]

More at

[Jay777]

Ping!

[Buck W.]

Soon we will have hundreds of sound bites from democrats praising a decision favorable to terrorists. That's the upside.

[tobyhill]

Yep, keep thinking you won ACLU because now the terrorist can be held until the end of The War on Terrorism (20-30 years?). Be careful what one ask for because they just might get it.

[Brilliant]

I would call it a victory for al-Qaeda.

[bubman]

No problem. Release them all! Our boys will shoot to kill first and ask questions later. This ruling all but guarantees that terrorists or non-terrorists for that matter caught on the battlefield will be killed for sure.

Sounds like a plan. Happy hunting boys.

[The G Man]

[SamuraiScot]

So, I guess there won't be trials. That shouldn't be a big problem. Since they're illegal combatants to begin with, they can just be shot now.

[Cicero]

It's a victory for the rule of judicial imperialism and arbitrary judgments by left wing political judges.

Once again, this decision confirms that the appointment of decent, fair, conservative judges is the single most important item on the political agenda, even more important than fighting the war on terror. Because you can't fight a war while the country is being undermined by traitors.

We need to build the coalition of Christian conservatives and libertarian conservatives to take back our courts, so the laws will be decided by the Constitution, due process, and the voice of the people, not by arbitrary judicial fiat by left-wing activists.

That means the right to life must be inseperably combined with the right to liberty, for neither is possible without the other.

There must be no compromise. We need more Alitos, as many as possible, until our courts have been taken back from these elitist destroyers of our country.

[sgtbono2002]

And the Liberals were afraid of the court becoming too Conservative. Doesnt seem to matter much. The Supremes :Still helping terrorists.

[synbad600]

I think I read or heard that the administration is trying to get rid of a lot of them but their own countries don't want them back! HA!

[subterfuge]

Another plank in the leftist's plans to win elections! Good luck with that!

[Txsleuth]

Well...if the ACLU is happy...then I KNOW this is a disastrous ruling.

[Quix]

Lord, isn't there a tectonic plate fault somewhere big enough to swallow up the ACLU whole?

[Logical me]

I have an answer. Round up Gitmo and fly them back to a mountain top in Afghan. Then drop some used old guns. Little ammo. Very little food and water to make them angry. Make sure we have the artillery lined to remove the top of the mountain. They set up some dummies so the nuts will shoot. Pow!!!!!!! Problem solved.

[Dr. Thorne]

The euphoria rergarding the confirmations of Roberts and Alito was premature. Kennedy, clearly the least intelligent Justice on the Court (read a few of his decisions, they are laughable), will be joining the left-wing activists few more frequently than the strict constructionists.

How old is Stevens? When can he be declared non compos mentis?

[DustyMoment]

ACLU Calls Supreme Court's Hamdan Decision a Victory for the “Rule of Law”

Bush, Roberts and Alito better be hunkering down for this one. So far, we still don't have the conservative court that we want and, apparently, Roberts was ineffective at convincing his SCOTUS justices from swinging to the left. I remain unconvinced that Bush's new guys are as totally conservative as we have been told, even though both of them voted in the minority on this decision.

[Mike Darancette]

Most of those guys have been there for over 2 years any will be eligible for a path to citizenship.

[RoseofTexas]

I just knew those evil F'ers were going to be the first ones to crow about this decision....GOD I HATE THEM!!

[Mo1]

ACLU cheering for the terrorist

Surprise Surprise ... / sarc >

[Publius6961]

ACLU Calls Supreme Court's Hamdan Decision a Victory for the “Rule Abuse of Law”

There.
I fixed it.

"Laws are a means, not an end".