Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stem cells contain immortal DNA
Medical Research News ^ | Monday, 26-Jun-2006

Posted on 06/29/2006 8:36:25 AM PDT by Sopater

EuroStemCell scientists at the Pasteur Institute in Paris have demonstrated one of the body's most sophisticated ways of regulating the genetic material of stem cells. Their findings, published in Nature Cell Biology, show for the first time the mechanism that adult muscle stem cells use to protect their DNA from mutations. Understanding this has important implications for cancer research, the study of gene regulation, and ultimately growing stem cells of therapeutic potential in the laboratory.

When a cell divides, its DNA is duplicated and each resulting daughter cell inherits one copy of the DNA. Over time, errors arising during the duplication process can lead to mutations and cause cancers. Using sophisticated approaches including video imaging the Pasteur team show that stem cells retain the original DNA strands. Their findings also represent the best visual evidence yet for immortal DNA - a controversial theory first proposed more than 3 decades ago.

A stem cell can produce two different daughter cells when it divides in the body - another stem cell and a specialised cell that will contribute to the tissue. This is called "asymmetric division" and helps stem cells regulate their numbers and retain their capacity to regenerate tissue throughout the life of an organism. According to the immortal DNA hypothesis, when a stem cell divides, only the specialised cell inherits the imperfect copied DNA. The stem cell retains the original "immortal" DNA strand.

Leading the Pasteur team, Shahragim Tajbakhsh says "the immortal DNA theory has captured the imagination of many scientists for decades, but it has been particularly difficult to prove. By tracking skeletal muscle stem cells from mouse muscle fibres, both in vivo and in the dish, we have shown that the DNA strands of the double helix are not equivalent, and we have linked this phenomenon with the general asymmetry apparatus of the dividing cell."

He adds "this is an exciting finding, as it seems to defy one of the basic rules of cell biology and genetics: that genetic material is distributed randomly. It appears that the cellular machinery distinguishes old from new when it comes to DNA, and it may use this distinction to protect the body from mutations and cancer. It is also possible that this mechanism is used to silence gene expression in the stem cell."


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: dna; evolution; mutations; naturalselection; reproduction; science; stemcells
"this is an exciting finding, as it seems to defy one of the basic rules of cell biology and genetics: that genetic material is distributed randomly. It appears that the cellular machinery distinguishes old from new when it comes to DNA, and it may use this distinction to protect the body from mutations... It is also possible that this mechanism is used to silence gene expression in the stem cell."

This research appears to raise the bar a bit for evoutionary theory as a result a natural selection of random genetic mutations. This research doesn't necessarily say that mutations won't happen, but that the method of cell reproduction tends to hinder mutations from being reproduced in other stem cells. I wonder how this carries over to sperm and egg cells?
1 posted on 06/29/2006 8:36:26 AM PDT by Sopater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Interesting! bttt


2 posted on 06/29/2006 8:38:22 AM PDT by Matchett-PI ( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Except embyonic cells are not your to steal.

Calling it something subhuman does not make it right.

It is the same excuse the Islamists use in enslaving and killing people. It was the same excuse used by Nazis against Jews. It was the same excuse used in keeping Africans as slaves.


3 posted on 06/29/2006 8:38:36 AM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
It could prevent replication errors (mutations) but won't really protect against mutations caused by damage to that "immortal" DNA strand (via radiation or some other cause).
4 posted on 06/29/2006 8:39:54 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Something to think on.


5 posted on 06/29/2006 8:40:19 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Nonsensical headline.
6 posted on 06/29/2006 8:42:37 AM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

immortality can only be bestowed upon humanity by God!


7 posted on 06/29/2006 8:45:19 AM PDT by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Is it proper to say DNA is immortal or mortal?


8 posted on 06/29/2006 8:47:24 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Except embyonic cells

The article is about adult stem cells, not embyronic stem cells.

9 posted on 06/29/2006 8:52:20 AM PDT by sourcery (A libertarian is a conservative who has been mugged ...by his own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Nonsensical headline

Not in context of the story, which discusses the "Immortal DNA" theory in some detail.

10 posted on 06/29/2006 9:23:57 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

This is what the Super Adventure Club actually believes!


11 posted on 06/29/2006 9:25:08 AM PDT by BaBaStooey (I heart Emma Caulfield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

OK. What is "immortal DNA"?


12 posted on 06/29/2006 10:12:14 AM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
OK. What is "immortal DNA"?

The article covers that, too. I hate to sound snippy, but did you even read it?

13 posted on 06/29/2006 10:35:48 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
The article covers that, too. I hate to sound snippy, but did you even read it?

No. Why do you ask?

14 posted on 06/29/2006 10:37:13 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Well, of course you didn't read it.... sheesh. Some things just go without saying.
15 posted on 06/29/2006 11:50:58 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
The article does not cover what it is.

It covers asymetric division and states that the "immortal DNA" is not modified and stays in the stem cell and the mortal DNA segregates with what can be called a daughter cell.

It says nothing about what it is.

I will read the Nature article and get back to you about what it is and why the "immortal DNA" terminology is rather silly -- or maybe it's not a silly term and makes sense.

16 posted on 06/29/2006 11:54:11 AM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
It says nothing about what it is

You just described what it is ... perhaps you want it to be more than a handy term for something so simple as, "it is not modified."

Aging is presumed to be the cumulative effect of errors in copying DNA over time -- hence, "mortal" DNA, since aging and mortality are tightly linked.

The "immortal" terminology results from fact that stem cells apparently do not have these errors, and thus (presumably) are immune to aging.

It's just a shorthand term -- best not to read too much into it.

17 posted on 06/29/2006 1:30:38 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Yeah. I looked at the article. The phenotypic asymmetric division of stem cells is well established (in drosophila models) and must occur if the stem cells are to expand. This is trying to put a chromosomal replicative mechanism to it.

It's interesting and I am glad you answered my comment because I looked in to this and will study this topic more. My take is that this phenomenon to the extent that it occurs is probably not to insure copy fidelity but relates to epigentic states that need to be maintained specific for the expandable stem cell phenotype daughter. This latter idea also provides ideas on mechanisms for the physical segregation specificity.

18 posted on 06/29/2006 2:14:01 PM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson