Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sensitive Superman Returns(dumbed down girlie-man version slacker metrosexual) [spoiler]
http://www.frontpagemag.com ^ | June 28, 2006 | Debbie Schlussel

Posted on 06/28/2006 4:41:44 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45

So Lois Lane is a single mother . . . and a slut. That's the most disturbing part of "Superman Returns," heavily marketed to kids and in theaters tonight.

Or is that "Lois and Her Feelings," co-starring Supe? That's what this dull, 2-hour 33-minute long latest rendition in the Superman series seemed like.

A better version would have been more relevant. It's great that new Superman Brandon Routh saluted America's troops as "the real Super Heroes," a tie-in with Warner Brothers Pictures' effort to send a million plus postcards of support to troops overseas.

But put your money where your mouth is. In World War II, Superman's comic book inventors had him fighting the Nazis. Today, they won't dare show him fighting contemporary Nazis--Islamofascists. Lex Luthor working with Al-Qaeda terrorists, with both evil forces getting defeated--that would have been dynamic and exciting, a great plot. But, unfortunately, too politically incorrect, current, and exciting for the Hollywood culturatti.

Some have asked whether Superman is still relevant post-9/11. He would be . . . if he was fighting the post-9/11 enemy and being a man while doing so.

Instead, we got a dumbed down, girlie-man version of Superman in "Superman Returns." Like every sensitive, slacker metrosexual, Supe's gone off for five years to "discover himself." In the meantime, the dullest Lois Lane ever has a child out of wedlock. Nice message to send to your kids who will be begging to see this. No smoking lectures by Superman and plugs for tofu sandwiches got a lot of play though. Script-writers were more concerned with that kind of health than the splendid problems single motherhood brings.

In what is more reminiscent of a Maury Povich "Who's the Daddy?" show than a Superman plot, Lois apparently slept around and thinks the cutesy kid--very annoying and distracting in the film--is her fiance's child, not that of the other guy she was simultaneously sleeping with--the Man of Steel.

Hard to still call him that, because in this film he's far less muscular. Even the formerly bright red of his cape is now a muted, dingy brownish-burgundy. All masculinity is toned down, in favor of the testosterone of career woman Lois, who doesn't believe in marriage. Too busy riding the space shuttle.

That hardly makes her spectacular. Kate Bosworth has nothing on Margot Kidder (aside from her far-left wackoism) or even Terry Hatcher. Their renditions of Ms. Lane were far superior. Bosworth's is as ho-hum as the lady at the supermarket looking for her Clairol fix. The only thing that seems apropos is Lane's Pulitzer Prize for her "Why the World Doesn't Need Superman." It's the work of unethical journalism--a "hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" by a jilted lover against her boyfriend.

In the real world's Daily Planet a/k/a The New York Times, the "Pulitzer-level" stuff is "Why Al-Qaeda is Less Dangerous to the World Than President Bush."

And by the way, there's no Internet in this movie--a glaring absence when Lois' editor is lecturing about what sells newspapers. Uh, nothing sells newspapers these days. They're in rapid decline.

There are no memorable lines like the ones Margot Kidder's Lois uttered to Christopher Reeve's Supe: "You've got me? Who's got you?"

More like, who's got this movie?

With a $300 million budget, Warner Brothers must have a hit with this film. There's so much marketing hype and so many product tie-ins, it will be hard for it to fail. And with newcomer Brandon Routh's spot on impersonation of Christopher Reeve playing Clark Kent/Supe, he's not as difficult to adjust to as Bosworth's Lois. His imitation invites the comparison, and he doesn't live up to it. Christopher Reeve can smile from the grave that he died undefeated champion of Superman portrayals.

"Supe Returns" writers also paid too much attention to the accuracy of minute and unimportant details, such as the fact that Kryptonite was found in Addis Ababa. But who cares about those things?

Is that more important than the messages projected to America's kids--especially girls who may want to emulate Lois Lane? And is it more important than an exciting, believable, and relevant plot? Hardly.

Still, aside from it's dullness and the poor examples it sets for kids, "Superman Returns" is a fun, escapist film.

But nothing to write home--or even, Krypton--about.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2crude4kids; crap; culturewar; debbieschlussel; donttakeyourkids; entertainment; homosexualagenda; itsabird; itsaplane; lookupinthesky; manofsteel; moviereview; msmdbm; not4kids; slut4loislane; superman; supermanreturns; superwuss
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 next last
To: Luis Gonzalez

It was at the end of the movie before the Bride told Bill about finding out that she was pregnant during the Lisa Wong assignment.

Kill Bill is a good movie.


101 posted on 06/28/2006 10:39:34 PM PDT by racing fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

Magento was always the head of the brotherhood of evil mutants.

If he joined the Xmen in the 1990s that was long after Stanley Leiber had any say.


102 posted on 06/29/2006 12:29:55 AM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Sentis

It is revisionist history to say the decades of comics never happened and years of television and cartoons never happened and even movies that starred the same actor in the title role NEVER HAPPENED.

Lois Lane is a slut.


103 posted on 06/29/2006 12:32:05 AM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sentis

The director who made the movie claims that he pitched Xmen to the actor he cast as Magneto by saying it was about Gay Politics.

Now that doesn't mean that he put his agenda into Superman but this film is hardly a "conservative epic". Maybe you are reading things into characters actions.


104 posted on 06/29/2006 12:35:28 AM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
I've always wondered if the original character was based on the premise of Nietzsche's superman,

Possibly. They wrote a number of pulp fiction stories about this premise in the 1920s. I think in one he was a villain. I think in another there was a planet of people with super powers. Some editor (who was also a famous sf writer) advised them to put their super man on a planet of normal men.

105 posted on 06/29/2006 12:40:12 AM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

The question remains if Lex Luthor would ever give billions of dollars to "charitable trust foundations".


106 posted on 06/29/2006 12:42:43 AM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat

Murphy Brown lives.


107 posted on 06/29/2006 12:44:08 AM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: All

108 posted on 06/29/2006 12:53:31 AM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sentis

"If you dont go see it your missing the point or never got the point in the first place."

Nope, haven't seen it and probably won't. The fact that it was made by a flamin liberal made me doubt it from the start. The fact they admit to taking this american icon and dumbing it down is offensive.

There is no point I'm missing. Hollywood has made yet another rerun because they lack the creativity to make anything original Americans will watch.


109 posted on 06/29/2006 2:46:36 AM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

Aaaaah, another fine screed from the wanna-be Coulter.

Why does anyone take anything this hysterical idiot writes seriously? Come on.


110 posted on 06/29/2006 5:05:39 AM PDT by Ace of Spades (Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sentis
You said the world doesn't need salvation so why do I hear it calling out for a Savior.

Nothing I have ever posted could lead anyone to think that I do not believe the world needs a Savior. In fact we already have a Savior, we just need to accept Him, Jesus Christ.

111 posted on 06/29/2006 9:01:22 AM PDT by itsahoot (The home of the Free, Because of the Brave (Shamelessly stolen from a Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: weegee

I don't know, it might have been in the late '80s or early '90s. I have an X-Men #1 (from one of their "let's start over" years) and Magneto was head of the Brotherhood, but a lot of the interpersonal dynamics and dialogue indicated that he had been a member of the X-Men for a little while, or, at the very least, a strong ally. Even the animated series played on that dynamic for a time.


112 posted on 06/29/2006 9:07:43 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (The plan was simple, like my brother-in-law Phil. But unlike Phil, this plan just might work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Jack Deth
I've always preferred Batman to Superman.

So did I for some reason.

ff

113 posted on 06/29/2006 10:06:03 AM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jack Deth

Dana Delany was a great Lois.


114 posted on 06/29/2006 10:11:46 AM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45
Uh huh. No mention of 9/11, no mention of Al Qaeda, no mention of Islamofascism and the only enemy worth fighting is.... omnivorism! It makes the PUtAH folks proud. We got a politically correct, feminine Superman and a Lois Lane who's all butch. This could have been a great summer movie. We didn't get one.

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")

115 posted on 06/29/2006 10:12:54 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Liberals can't even bring themselves to praise American goodness! Wow, the times have changed, and not in a good way, for sure.

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")

116 posted on 06/29/2006 10:14:36 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

Hi, Rastus:

Dana Delaney still is a great Lois Lane. Her voice was featured as Lois Lane's in the most recent Warner Brothers' animated offering "Brainiac Attacks".

The only character's voice to be changed (for the worse, in my opinion) was Lex Luthor's. Warner went with Powers Boothe, instead of keeping Clancy Brown. Whose voice has always seemed very meancing, even when it's not supposed to be.

They also dumbed down Luthor's role to that of occasional Comic Relief, which is just plain wrong!

Jack.


117 posted on 06/29/2006 10:22:01 AM PDT by Jack Deth (Knight Errant and Disemboweler of the WFTD Thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Jack Deth

I saw that in the store, but every review I've read said it's to be avoided at all costs. I understand it plays for free on Cartoon Network, so perhaps I'll watch it there and see.


118 posted on 06/29/2006 10:23:37 AM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Rastus
I saw that in the store, but every review I've read said it's to be avoided at all costs. I understand it plays for free on Cartoon Network, so perhaps I'll watch it there and see.

I caught "Braniac Attacks" on Cartoon Network and it isn't one of Warner Brothers' Best Efforts. Around a C when compared to the early Amimated Series.

I'd like Cartoon Network to have a Marathon of the early Batman and Superman Animated series of a holiday weekend.

Jack.
119 posted on 06/29/2006 10:32:57 AM PDT by Jack Deth (Knight Errant and Disemboweler of the WFTD Thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Hollywood has made yet another rerun because they lack the creativity to make anything original Americans will watch.

I like remakes and took some time out to see Superman Returns. I included your comment above because after seeing the movie, I think the use of the word rerun is fitting. Apart from the nifty CGI effects, this movie seemed flat like I've seen it before. It was a rerun. For $300,000,000.00 a much more creative story could have been developed.

120 posted on 06/29/2006 10:33:58 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson