1 posted on
06/27/2006 1:31:37 PM PDT by
Uncledave
To: Uncledave
This should get interesting.
To: Uncledave
It would be for the better. But he's right and this should get very interesting. However, it will be spinned by any station that carries it.
To: Uncledave
The administration has to start somewhere and this is as good a place as any. :0)
To: Uncledave
Heh heh heh.
Truly, what does it matter anyway? The Slimes of New York doesn't give a damn about the truth anyway. Their "news" page for years has been a surrogate editorial page and has been used as a mouth organ for the Democrat party.
Let 'em find their "news" some other way. Plenty of Democrat party operatives will grant their fellow operatives at the Slimes interview time.
Replace the Slimes in the press corps with someone from the Pajama Media.
6 posted on
06/27/2006 1:37:54 PM PDT by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
To: Uncledave
Nice sentiment but it will never happen.
7 posted on
06/27/2006 1:37:54 PM PDT by
tsmith130
To: Uncledave
Oops. Meant to add the House and the Senate should all do this. I think that the American people are looking for some kind of punishment for the Times giving up secrets. Let the Democrats take up for the Times and see how many friends that will get them.
To: Uncledave
Good! Now call a committee hearing with Keller, Risen and Lickemballs as witnesses, put them under oath and then make them disclose their sources or go to jail.
10 posted on
06/27/2006 1:40:42 PM PDT by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: Uncledave
I wonder how far this will go. All the way to a federal prison, I hope.
11 posted on
06/27/2006 1:45:55 PM PDT by
TSchmereL
("Rust but terrify.")
To: Uncledave; SunkenCiv
Yeah, let the Times find out what a "chilling feeling" is really like!
12 posted on
06/27/2006 1:46:40 PM PDT by
Berosus
("There is no beauty like Jerusalem, no wealth like Rome, no depravity like Arabia."--the Talmud)
To: Uncledave
If I were the President I would have already thrown the editors of the NYT in Guantanamo.
14 posted on
06/27/2006 1:49:02 PM PDT by
conservative physics
(only a liberal could think boys with energy are mental, but boys attracted to other boys are normal)
To: Uncledave
does anyone have a link to the original Slimes article? thanks
15 posted on
06/27/2006 1:49:45 PM PDT by
God luvs America
(When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
To: Uncledave
NYT continues free-fall!
16 posted on
06/27/2006 1:50:10 PM PDT by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: Uncledave
But didn't the LATimes and the Wall Street Journal also report the story on the same day. Is he calling for the same action against those two papers?
18 posted on
06/27/2006 2:01:16 PM PDT by
dawn53
To: Uncledave
Permanent revocation of credentials for the NY Times, and everyone working there (i.e., if an employee leaves to go to another company, he can't get credentials) with Congress and the entire United States government. Make it a firing offense to even be seen in the company of, or talking to, a NY Times reporter, editor or worker, or to communicate with the NY Times in any form, oral, written or electronic (or tom tom, for that matter).
Do the same thing for the LA Times, but make it a 1 year loss of credentials.
Do the same thing for the WSJ, but make it a 3 month loss of credential.
Oh, and blacklist from government contracts any company that advertises in the any of those papers after a cut-off date (and offer to compensate advertisers if they've prepaid).
THEN, get serious about criminal charges....
19 posted on
06/27/2006 2:03:26 PM PDT by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
To: Uncledave
Kiss my shiny metal @ss NY Times (you're boned).
20 posted on
06/27/2006 2:13:25 PM PDT by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein(the moon is a harsh mistress))
To: Uncledave
24 posted on
06/27/2006 2:42:28 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Uncledave
Why doesn't he introduce a resolution condemning the NYT for giving aid and comfort to the enemy. That would seem to be a much stronger rebuke then taking away their credentials.
25 posted on
06/27/2006 2:43:30 PM PDT by
TXKATE
To: Uncledave
Never happen. Sorry, but don't get hopes up. Wish it would.
26 posted on
06/27/2006 5:27:09 PM PDT by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: Uncledave
OT: O'REeilly just had Michael Scheuer on (as a CBS analyst), to talk about the leaks & the NYT. Scheuer thinks Bush's political appointees are the leakers. Fox did show the book he wrote. VERY bizarre & disturbing.
27 posted on
06/27/2006 5:32:13 PM PDT by
PghBaldy
(Yeah! I love President Bush. What a gutsy guy. God Bless America.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson