Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Radix
I do not think that it includes judges forbidding active debate about observable things

What is obesrvable about the process of Creation? By definition it is unobservable (unless something has *poofed* into existence in a recorded way that you know of).

We have evidence, we have theories that attempt to explain that evidence. Creation is not a theory. It is a belief.

197 posted on 06/22/2006 8:05:30 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The Left created, embraces and feeds "The Culture of Hate." Make it part of the political lexicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

I do not tnink that I have even used the word "creation" here tonight. Maybe I did but that is not my point anyhow.

It is the darwinists who are suppressing dissent.

My real issue is about free thinking people being able to deliberate on diverse opinions.

The "machine" will no longer allow that.

It is not open minded to put a muzzle over the mouth of an antaganost.

Even Luther and Eck had debates way back in the good old latter part of the dark ages.

The Scientists refuse to work in the laboratory of public opinion. Talk about laws written in stone. Oh the irony of the fossil record.

You are no better than scribes working with stones and chisels.

You really can't see it, and yet you chastise the creationists because why? They accept things that they cannot prove?

Truly you peer through a clouded glass.


234 posted on 06/22/2006 9:27:20 PM PDT by Radix (Stop domestic violence. Beat abroad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson