I do not tnink that I have even used the word "creation" here tonight. Maybe I did but that is not my point anyhow.
It is the darwinists who are suppressing dissent.
My real issue is about free thinking people being able to deliberate on diverse opinions.
The "machine" will no longer allow that.
It is not open minded to put a muzzle over the mouth of an antaganost.
Even Luther and Eck had debates way back in the good old latter part of the dark ages.
The Scientists refuse to work in the laboratory of public opinion. Talk about laws written in stone. Oh the irony of the fossil record.
You are no better than scribes working with stones and chisels.
You really can't see it, and yet you chastise the creationists because why? They accept things that they cannot prove?
Truly you peer through a clouded glass.
OK, I am open -- provide a scientific alternative to TTOE. And not by the trite "anything that is researched" definition (which means there can be a "science of astrology" eveny by their example).
I am ready.